姑息性电痉挛治疗:一项描述性队列研究。

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Gregg A Robbins-Welty, Ryan D Slauer, Madeline M Brown, Morgan M Nakatani, Dan Shalev, Jacob Feigal
{"title":"姑息性电痉挛治疗:一项描述性队列研究。","authors":"Gregg A Robbins-Welty, Ryan D Slauer, Madeline M Brown, Morgan M Nakatani, Dan Shalev, Jacob Feigal","doi":"10.1016/j.jaclp.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care (PC) is the standard of care for patients with serious medical illnesses, or those conditions associated with high risk of mortality and negative impact on quality of life (QOL). Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the gold standard treatment for certain psychiatric conditions, which may co-occur with serious medical illnesses. However, the use of \"palliative ECT\" (PECT) in this context is understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a descriptive retrospective cohort study reviewing the indications, outcomes, and regimens of PECT. We included patients who had an ECT consultation, in addition to either a PC consultation or a do-not-attempt-resuscitation code status between 2018 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients met our inclusion criteria, and 21 received ECT. The cohort was predominantly female (70%) with a mean age of 67.6 (range 25-90). Catatonia (64.5%) and treatment-resistant depressive disorder (35.5%) were the most common indications for ECT. At the time of ECT consultation, 16 patients (51.6%) had a serious medical illness, including cancer (19.4%) or end-organ disease (22.6%). Fourteen patients had major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD) (45.2%). Surrogate decision-makers consented for ECT in 64.5% of cases. All 21 patients who received ECT experienced psychiatric symptom improvement. ECT was associated with reduced mortality risk in 5 (23.8%) cases. Five patients initially misdiagnosed with MNCD experienced recovery in cognitive function after ECT, and the diagnosis was revised to depression-related cognitive dysfunction. Eight patients retained a comorbid MNCD diagnosis but experienced a mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) improvement of 5 points (range 0 to 17) with ECT.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This work highlights the use of ECT among patients with serious medical illnesses, identifying cases when ECT was beneficial or deemed unsuitable. Patients with serious medical illnesses who also had an indication for ECT experienced improved QOL with ECT. Misdiagnoses, such as confusing depression-related cognitive dysfunction and catatonia for MNCD, were effectively addressed through ECT. The findings underscore the importance of cross-specialty collaboration between C-L psychiatry and PC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who receive PECT experience reduced suffering and improved QOL. PECT may be helpful in scenarios of life-threatening psychiatric illnesses, terminal medical illnesses with comorbid treatment-refractory psychiatric illnesses, and diagnostic uncertainty with MNCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":52388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Descriptive Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Gregg A Robbins-Welty, Ryan D Slauer, Madeline M Brown, Morgan M Nakatani, Dan Shalev, Jacob Feigal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaclp.2024.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care (PC) is the standard of care for patients with serious medical illnesses, or those conditions associated with high risk of mortality and negative impact on quality of life (QOL). Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the gold standard treatment for certain psychiatric conditions, which may co-occur with serious medical illnesses. However, the use of \\\"palliative ECT\\\" (PECT) in this context is understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a descriptive retrospective cohort study reviewing the indications, outcomes, and regimens of PECT. We included patients who had an ECT consultation, in addition to either a PC consultation or a do-not-attempt-resuscitation code status between 2018 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one patients met our inclusion criteria, and 21 received ECT. The cohort was predominantly female (70%) with a mean age of 67.6 (range 25-90). Catatonia (64.5%) and treatment-resistant depressive disorder (35.5%) were the most common indications for ECT. At the time of ECT consultation, 16 patients (51.6%) had a serious medical illness, including cancer (19.4%) or end-organ disease (22.6%). Fourteen patients had major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD) (45.2%). Surrogate decision-makers consented for ECT in 64.5% of cases. All 21 patients who received ECT experienced psychiatric symptom improvement. ECT was associated with reduced mortality risk in 5 (23.8%) cases. Five patients initially misdiagnosed with MNCD experienced recovery in cognitive function after ECT, and the diagnosis was revised to depression-related cognitive dysfunction. Eight patients retained a comorbid MNCD diagnosis but experienced a mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) improvement of 5 points (range 0 to 17) with ECT.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This work highlights the use of ECT among patients with serious medical illnesses, identifying cases when ECT was beneficial or deemed unsuitable. Patients with serious medical illnesses who also had an indication for ECT experienced improved QOL with ECT. Misdiagnoses, such as confusing depression-related cognitive dysfunction and catatonia for MNCD, were effectively addressed through ECT. The findings underscore the importance of cross-specialty collaboration between C-L psychiatry and PC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients who receive PECT experience reduced suffering and improved QOL. PECT may be helpful in scenarios of life-threatening psychiatric illnesses, terminal medical illnesses with comorbid treatment-refractory psychiatric illnesses, and diagnostic uncertainty with MNCD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaclp.2024.12.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaclp.2024.12.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介姑息治疗(PC)是重症患者或死亡风险高且对生活质量(QOL)有负面影响的患者的标准治疗方法。电休克疗法(ECT)是治疗某些精神疾病的金标准,这些疾病可能与严重的内科疾病同时存在。然而,在这种情况下使用 "姑息性电休克疗法"(PECT)的情况还未得到充分研究:我们进行了一项描述性回顾性队列研究,回顾了 PECT 的适应症、结果和治疗方案。我们纳入了在2018年至2023年期间接受过ECT会诊的患者,此外还纳入了PC会诊或DNAR代码状态的患者:31名患者符合我们的纳入标准,其中21人接受了ECT治疗。患者以女性为主(70%),平均年龄为 67.6 岁(25-90 岁不等)。紧张症(64.5%)和耐药抑郁症(35.5%)是最常见的 ECT 适应症。就诊时,16 名患者(51.6%)患有严重的内科疾病,包括癌症(19.4%)或内脏疾病(22.6%)。14名患者患有严重神经认知障碍(MNCD)(45.2%)。64.5%的病例的代理决策者同意接受电痉挛疗法。所有21名接受电痉挛疗法的患者的精神症状均有所改善。5例(23.8%)患者接受电痉挛疗法后降低了死亡风险。五名最初被误诊为MNCD的患者在接受电痉挛疗法后认知功能得到恢复,诊断结果被修正为抑郁相关认知功能障碍(DRCD)。8名患者仍合并有MNCD诊断,但在接受ECT治疗后,蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的平均值提高了5分(范围为0至17分):这项研究强调了在患有严重内科疾病的患者中使用电痉挛疗法的情况,确定了电痉挛疗法有益或不适合的病例。重症内科疾病患者如果也有接受电痉挛疗法的指征,那么他们在接受电痉挛疗法后的生活质量会得到改善。通过电痉挛疗法有效地解决了误诊问题,例如将 DRCD 和紧张症混淆为 MNCD。研究结果强调了C-L精神科和PC跨专科合作的重要性:结论:接受 PECT 治疗的患者可以减轻痛苦,提高 QOL。在危及生命的精神疾病、合并难治性精神疾病的终末期内科疾病以及 MNCD 诊断不确定的情况下,PECT 可能会有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Palliative Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Descriptive Cohort Study.

Background: Palliative care (PC) is the standard of care for patients with serious medical illnesses, or those conditions associated with high risk of mortality and negative impact on quality of life (QOL). Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the gold standard treatment for certain psychiatric conditions, which may co-occur with serious medical illnesses. However, the use of "palliative ECT" (PECT) in this context is understudied.

Methods: We conducted a descriptive retrospective cohort study reviewing the indications, outcomes, and regimens of PECT. We included patients who had an ECT consultation, in addition to either a PC consultation or a do-not-attempt-resuscitation code status between 2018 and 2023.

Results: Thirty-one patients met our inclusion criteria, and 21 received ECT. The cohort was predominantly female (70%) with a mean age of 67.6 (range 25-90). Catatonia (64.5%) and treatment-resistant depressive disorder (35.5%) were the most common indications for ECT. At the time of ECT consultation, 16 patients (51.6%) had a serious medical illness, including cancer (19.4%) or end-organ disease (22.6%). Fourteen patients had major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD) (45.2%). Surrogate decision-makers consented for ECT in 64.5% of cases. All 21 patients who received ECT experienced psychiatric symptom improvement. ECT was associated with reduced mortality risk in 5 (23.8%) cases. Five patients initially misdiagnosed with MNCD experienced recovery in cognitive function after ECT, and the diagnosis was revised to depression-related cognitive dysfunction. Eight patients retained a comorbid MNCD diagnosis but experienced a mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) improvement of 5 points (range 0 to 17) with ECT.

Discussion: This work highlights the use of ECT among patients with serious medical illnesses, identifying cases when ECT was beneficial or deemed unsuitable. Patients with serious medical illnesses who also had an indication for ECT experienced improved QOL with ECT. Misdiagnoses, such as confusing depression-related cognitive dysfunction and catatonia for MNCD, were effectively addressed through ECT. The findings underscore the importance of cross-specialty collaboration between C-L psychiatry and PC.

Conclusions: Patients who receive PECT experience reduced suffering and improved QOL. PECT may be helpful in scenarios of life-threatening psychiatric illnesses, terminal medical illnesses with comorbid treatment-refractory psychiatric illnesses, and diagnostic uncertainty with MNCD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信