影像引导热消融治疗高危I期非小细胞肺癌的系统评价

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Michael Lanuti, Robert D Suh, Gerard J Criner, Peter J Mazzone, M Blair Marshall, Betty Tong, Robert E Merritt, Andrea Wolf, Homa Keshavarz, Billy W Loo, Raymond H Mak, Alessandro Brunelli, Garrett Walsh, Michael Liptay, Q Eileen Wafford, Sudish Murthy, Brian Pettiford, Gaetano Rocco, James Luketich, Matthew J Schuchert, Thomas K Varghese, Thomas A D'Amico, Scott J Swanson, Arjun Pennathur
{"title":"影像引导热消融治疗高危I期非小细胞肺癌的系统评价","authors":"Michael Lanuti, Robert D Suh, Gerard J Criner, Peter J Mazzone, M Blair Marshall, Betty Tong, Robert E Merritt, Andrea Wolf, Homa Keshavarz, Billy W Loo, Raymond H Mak, Alessandro Brunelli, Garrett Walsh, Michael Liptay, Q Eileen Wafford, Sudish Murthy, Brian Pettiford, Gaetano Rocco, James Luketich, Matthew J Schuchert, Thomas K Varghese, Thomas A D'Amico, Scott J Swanson, Arjun Pennathur","doi":"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Image-guided thermal ablation (IGTA) applied to pulmonary pathology is an alternative to surgery in high-risk patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Its application to lung neoplasm was first introduced in 2001 and has been implemented to treat metastatic disease to the lung or in select medically inoperable patients with peripheral stage I NSCLC. IGTA may also be an alternative to treat stage I NSCLC in non-operable patients with interstitial lung disease in whom a radiation modality is deemed too high risk. There are 3 methods of delivery: radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation and cryoablation. Observational series and some prospective trials have shown safety and efficacy across all three modalities. Despite accumulating experience, there are no large randomized clinical trials comparing the outcomes of lung IGTA to alternative locoregional therapies (e.g. stereotactic body radiotherapy or sublobar pulmonary resection) for the treatment of stage I NSCLC. Because IGTA is a local therapy, a higher risk of locoregional recurrence is inherently understood as compared with anatomic resection. In the literature, primary tumor control after RFA ranges from 47-90% and is dependent on tumor size and proximity to bronchovascular structures. Local failure ranges from 10-47%, and tumors ≥ 3 cm have the highest rate of local recurrence. The most prevalent side effects are pneumothorax and reactive pleural effusion; hemorrhage is uncommon. Of note, observational series show no significant loss of lung function after IGTA. This expert review contextualizes limitations, complications and outcomes of IGTA in patients with stage I NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":48592,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review of Image-guided Thermal Ablation for Treatment of High-Risk Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Lanuti, Robert D Suh, Gerard J Criner, Peter J Mazzone, M Blair Marshall, Betty Tong, Robert E Merritt, Andrea Wolf, Homa Keshavarz, Billy W Loo, Raymond H Mak, Alessandro Brunelli, Garrett Walsh, Michael Liptay, Q Eileen Wafford, Sudish Murthy, Brian Pettiford, Gaetano Rocco, James Luketich, Matthew J Schuchert, Thomas K Varghese, Thomas A D'Amico, Scott J Swanson, Arjun Pennathur\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2024.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Image-guided thermal ablation (IGTA) applied to pulmonary pathology is an alternative to surgery in high-risk patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Its application to lung neoplasm was first introduced in 2001 and has been implemented to treat metastatic disease to the lung or in select medically inoperable patients with peripheral stage I NSCLC. IGTA may also be an alternative to treat stage I NSCLC in non-operable patients with interstitial lung disease in whom a radiation modality is deemed too high risk. There are 3 methods of delivery: radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation and cryoablation. Observational series and some prospective trials have shown safety and efficacy across all three modalities. Despite accumulating experience, there are no large randomized clinical trials comparing the outcomes of lung IGTA to alternative locoregional therapies (e.g. stereotactic body radiotherapy or sublobar pulmonary resection) for the treatment of stage I NSCLC. Because IGTA is a local therapy, a higher risk of locoregional recurrence is inherently understood as compared with anatomic resection. In the literature, primary tumor control after RFA ranges from 47-90% and is dependent on tumor size and proximity to bronchovascular structures. Local failure ranges from 10-47%, and tumors ≥ 3 cm have the highest rate of local recurrence. The most prevalent side effects are pneumothorax and reactive pleural effusion; hemorrhage is uncommon. Of note, observational series show no significant loss of lung function after IGTA. This expert review contextualizes limitations, complications and outcomes of IGTA in patients with stage I NSCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2024.11.001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2024.11.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

影像引导热消融(IGTA)应用于肺病理是I期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)高危患者手术的替代方法。它于2001年首次应用于肺肿瘤,并已用于治疗肺转移性疾病或选择医学上不能手术的外周I期非小细胞肺癌患者。IGTA也可以作为治疗I期非小细胞肺癌的替代方案,用于不能手术的间质性肺疾病患者,其中放疗方式被认为风险过高。有三种输送方式:射频消融(RFA)、微波消融和冷冻消融。观察性系列和一些前瞻性试验显示了所有三种模式的安全性和有效性。尽管积累了经验,但目前还没有大型随机临床试验比较肺IGTA与其他局部治疗(如立体定向体放疗或叶下肺切除术)治疗I期非小细胞肺癌的结果。由于IGTA是一种局部治疗,因此与解剖切除相比,局部复发的风险更高。在文献中,RFA后的原发性肿瘤控制率为47% -90%,取决于肿瘤大小和是否接近支气管血管结构。局部失败率为10-47%,≥3cm的肿瘤局部复发率最高。最常见的副作用是气胸和反应性胸腔积液;出血不常见。值得注意的是,观察系列显示IGTA治疗后肺功能没有明显下降。本专家综述了IGTA在I期NSCLC患者中的局限性、并发症和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic Review of Image-guided Thermal Ablation for Treatment of High-Risk Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Image-guided thermal ablation (IGTA) applied to pulmonary pathology is an alternative to surgery in high-risk patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Its application to lung neoplasm was first introduced in 2001 and has been implemented to treat metastatic disease to the lung or in select medically inoperable patients with peripheral stage I NSCLC. IGTA may also be an alternative to treat stage I NSCLC in non-operable patients with interstitial lung disease in whom a radiation modality is deemed too high risk. There are 3 methods of delivery: radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation and cryoablation. Observational series and some prospective trials have shown safety and efficacy across all three modalities. Despite accumulating experience, there are no large randomized clinical trials comparing the outcomes of lung IGTA to alternative locoregional therapies (e.g. stereotactic body radiotherapy or sublobar pulmonary resection) for the treatment of stage I NSCLC. Because IGTA is a local therapy, a higher risk of locoregional recurrence is inherently understood as compared with anatomic resection. In the literature, primary tumor control after RFA ranges from 47-90% and is dependent on tumor size and proximity to bronchovascular structures. Local failure ranges from 10-47%, and tumors ≥ 3 cm have the highest rate of local recurrence. The most prevalent side effects are pneumothorax and reactive pleural effusion; hemorrhage is uncommon. Of note, observational series show no significant loss of lung function after IGTA. This expert review contextualizes limitations, complications and outcomes of IGTA in patients with stage I NSCLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
12 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is devoted to providing a forum for cardiothoracic surgeons to disseminate and discuss important new information and to gain insight into unresolved areas of question in the specialty. Each issue presents readers with a selection of original peer-reviewed articles accompanied by editorial commentary from specialists in the field. In addition, readers are offered valuable invited articles: State of Views editorials and Current Readings highlighting the latest contributions on central or controversial issues. Another prized feature is expert roundtable discussions in which experts debate critical questions for cardiothoracic treatment and care. Seminars is an invitation-only publication that receives original submissions transferred ONLY from its sister publication, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. As we continue to expand the reach of the Journal, we will explore the possibility of accepting unsolicited manuscripts in the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信