仰卧位和站立位之间腰椎区域性后凸的差异。对脊柱骨折处理的启示。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Marc Khalifé, Emmanuelle Ferrero, Wafa Skalli, Pierre Guigui, Claudio Vergari, Laura Marie-Hardy
{"title":"仰卧位和站立位之间腰椎区域性后凸的差异。对脊柱骨折处理的启示。","authors":"Marc Khalifé, Emmanuelle Ferrero, Wafa Skalli, Pierre Guigui, Claudio Vergari, Laura Marie-Hardy","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The variation of lumbar lordosis between standing and supine position is poorly explored in literature. This study sought to analyze variation of lumbar regional angulations (RA) in healthy volunteers between standing and supine positions, according to pelvic incidence (PI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 171 patients who had an abdominal CT-scan in supine position and 879 healthy volunteers with full-body stereoradiographs. The two populations were matched using a propensity score including age, PI, and sex. PI and RAs for all vertebrae from T12 to L5 (measured between the overlying vertebra's upper endplate of and the underlying vertebra's lower endplate) were assessed. Studied parameters were compared between Supine and Standing groups in the whole cohort and in every PI group. Multivariate analysis was performed to ascertain the effect of position change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis was performed on 314 subjects (157 matched in each group). In the overall cohort, all RAs from L1 to L4 were more lordotic in the Standing group, ranging from 3 to 8° difference (all p < 0.001), while T12 and L5 RAs were comparable in both groups (p = 0.55 and 0.49, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed the significant associations between subject's position and all RAs except for L5 and T12. RA variation between positions occurred at more vertebral levels and tended to be greater in higher PI groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RA values in the lumbar spine are more lordotic in standing position than supine, except for T12 and L5. These results help estimate RA in Standing position in patients with lumbar fractures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in lumbar regional kyphosis between supine and standing positions. Implications for spinal fracture management.\",\"authors\":\"Marc Khalifé, Emmanuelle Ferrero, Wafa Skalli, Pierre Guigui, Claudio Vergari, Laura Marie-Hardy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The variation of lumbar lordosis between standing and supine position is poorly explored in literature. This study sought to analyze variation of lumbar regional angulations (RA) in healthy volunteers between standing and supine positions, according to pelvic incidence (PI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 171 patients who had an abdominal CT-scan in supine position and 879 healthy volunteers with full-body stereoradiographs. The two populations were matched using a propensity score including age, PI, and sex. PI and RAs for all vertebrae from T12 to L5 (measured between the overlying vertebra's upper endplate of and the underlying vertebra's lower endplate) were assessed. Studied parameters were compared between Supine and Standing groups in the whole cohort and in every PI group. Multivariate analysis was performed to ascertain the effect of position change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis was performed on 314 subjects (157 matched in each group). In the overall cohort, all RAs from L1 to L4 were more lordotic in the Standing group, ranging from 3 to 8° difference (all p < 0.001), while T12 and L5 RAs were comparable in both groups (p = 0.55 and 0.49, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed the significant associations between subject's position and all RAs except for L5 and T12. RA variation between positions occurred at more vertebral levels and tended to be greater in higher PI groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RA values in the lumbar spine are more lordotic in standing position than supine, except for T12 and L5. These results help estimate RA in Standing position in patients with lumbar fractures.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104085\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.104085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:文献很少探讨站立和仰卧位腰椎前凸的变化。本研究旨在根据骨盆发生率(PI)分析健康志愿者在站立和仰卧位之间腰椎区域角度(RA)的变化。方法:本研究包括171例仰卧位腹部ct扫描患者和879名全身立体x线片健康志愿者。使用包括年龄、PI和性别在内的倾向评分对两个人群进行匹配。评估从T12到L5所有椎体的PI和RAs(测量上覆椎体的上终板与下置椎体的下终板之间的距离)。比较整个队列中仰卧位组和站立位组及各PI组的研究参数。通过多变量分析确定体位变化的影响。结果:共对314例受试者进行分析,每组匹配157例。在整个队列中,站立组L1至L4的所有RAs都更前倾,差异范围为3至8°(均p < 0.001),而T12和L5 RAs在两组中具有可比性(p分别= 0.55和0.49)。多因素分析证实受试者体位与除L5和T12外的所有RAs均有显著相关。RA体位之间的差异发生在更多的椎体水平,并且在PI较高的组中往往更大。结论:除T12和L5外,站立位腰椎的RA值比仰卧位更前凸。这些结果有助于估计腰椎骨折患者站立位时的RA。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variation in lumbar regional kyphosis between supine and standing positions. Implications for spinal fracture management.

Purpose: The variation of lumbar lordosis between standing and supine position is poorly explored in literature. This study sought to analyze variation of lumbar regional angulations (RA) in healthy volunteers between standing and supine positions, according to pelvic incidence (PI).

Methods: This study included 171 patients who had an abdominal CT-scan in supine position and 879 healthy volunteers with full-body stereoradiographs. The two populations were matched using a propensity score including age, PI, and sex. PI and RAs for all vertebrae from T12 to L5 (measured between the overlying vertebra's upper endplate of and the underlying vertebra's lower endplate) were assessed. Studied parameters were compared between Supine and Standing groups in the whole cohort and in every PI group. Multivariate analysis was performed to ascertain the effect of position change.

Results: The analysis was performed on 314 subjects (157 matched in each group). In the overall cohort, all RAs from L1 to L4 were more lordotic in the Standing group, ranging from 3 to 8° difference (all p < 0.001), while T12 and L5 RAs were comparable in both groups (p = 0.55 and 0.49, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed the significant associations between subject's position and all RAs except for L5 and T12. RA variation between positions occurred at more vertebral levels and tended to be greater in higher PI groups.

Conclusion: RA values in the lumbar spine are more lordotic in standing position than supine, except for T12 and L5. These results help estimate RA in Standing position in patients with lumbar fractures.

Level of evidence: IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信