用不匹配的植入物翻修肱桡关节置换术-一种救助性选择:两例至少三年随访的报告。

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Tiago Martinho, Pieter Caekebeke, Lotte Verstuyft, Roger van Riet
{"title":"用不匹配的植入物翻修肱桡关节置换术-一种救助性选择:两例至少三年随访的报告。","authors":"Tiago Martinho, Pieter Caekebeke, Lotte Verstuyft, Roger van Riet","doi":"10.1177/17585732241297152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiocapitellar arthroplasty has been shown to improve pain and function in patients with a degenerative joint. Due to problems with the loosening of the radial head component, one of the few available systems was removed from the global market. This offered specific challenges in terms of treatment strategies when one or both components of a system that is no longer available fail. Due to the very different geometry of the capitellar implant, revision of the capitellar component would require a complex procedure, likely requiring bone graft and a high chance of early failure, leaving resection or interposition arthroplasty as the only available option. Although implant mismatch is common practice in hip and knee arthroplasty with satisfactory results, it should remain a salvage option as the off-label use of components gives rise to several medicolegal implications. We report two cases of radiocapitellar arthroplasty partial revision, by replacing only the radial head component with an implant from another system while keeping the well-fixed original capitellar component in place. At a minimum of three-year follow-up, both cases improved from poor to good and excellent Mayo elbow performance scores. There were no signs of implant failure on standard radiographs.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732241297152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revision radiocapitellar arthroplasty by mismatched implant components - A salvage option: A report of two cases with a minimum three-year follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"Tiago Martinho, Pieter Caekebeke, Lotte Verstuyft, Roger van Riet\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17585732241297152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Radiocapitellar arthroplasty has been shown to improve pain and function in patients with a degenerative joint. Due to problems with the loosening of the radial head component, one of the few available systems was removed from the global market. This offered specific challenges in terms of treatment strategies when one or both components of a system that is no longer available fail. Due to the very different geometry of the capitellar implant, revision of the capitellar component would require a complex procedure, likely requiring bone graft and a high chance of early failure, leaving resection or interposition arthroplasty as the only available option. Although implant mismatch is common practice in hip and knee arthroplasty with satisfactory results, it should remain a salvage option as the off-label use of components gives rise to several medicolegal implications. We report two cases of radiocapitellar arthroplasty partial revision, by replacing only the radial head component with an implant from another system while keeping the well-fixed original capitellar component in place. At a minimum of three-year follow-up, both cases improved from poor to good and excellent Mayo elbow performance scores. There were no signs of implant failure on standard radiographs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17585732241297152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629348/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241297152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241297152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

桡肱关节置换术已被证明可以改善退行性关节患者的疼痛和功能。由于径向头组件松动的问题,为数不多的可用系统之一被从全球市场上撤下。当系统的一个或两个组件不再可用时,这在处理策略方面提出了具体的挑战。由于小头假体的几何形状非常不同,小头假体的修复需要一个复杂的过程,可能需要骨移植,并且早期失败的可能性很大,因此切除或插入性关节置换术是唯一可行的选择。尽管假体不匹配在髋关节和膝关节置换术中是一种常见的做法,并取得了令人满意的结果,但它仍然是一种补救选择,因为假体的超说明书使用会产生一些医学上的影响。我们报告了两例桡骨小头关节置换术部分翻修的病例,通过用另一个系统的植入物替换桡骨头组件,同时保持原有的固定良好的小头组件。在至少三年的随访中,两例患者的Mayo肘关节功能评分均从差改善到好和优。在标准x线片上没有植入物失败的迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revision radiocapitellar arthroplasty by mismatched implant components - A salvage option: A report of two cases with a minimum three-year follow-up.

Radiocapitellar arthroplasty has been shown to improve pain and function in patients with a degenerative joint. Due to problems with the loosening of the radial head component, one of the few available systems was removed from the global market. This offered specific challenges in terms of treatment strategies when one or both components of a system that is no longer available fail. Due to the very different geometry of the capitellar implant, revision of the capitellar component would require a complex procedure, likely requiring bone graft and a high chance of early failure, leaving resection or interposition arthroplasty as the only available option. Although implant mismatch is common practice in hip and knee arthroplasty with satisfactory results, it should remain a salvage option as the off-label use of components gives rise to several medicolegal implications. We report two cases of radiocapitellar arthroplasty partial revision, by replacing only the radial head component with an implant from another system while keeping the well-fixed original capitellar component in place. At a minimum of three-year follow-up, both cases improved from poor to good and excellent Mayo elbow performance scores. There were no signs of implant failure on standard radiographs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信