GABAAR激动剂麻醉剂在神经发育和易损脑中的双重作用:从神经毒性到治疗作用。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Neural Regeneration Research Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-07 DOI:10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00828
Dihan Lu, Wen Zhang, Keyu Chen, Xia Feng
{"title":"GABAAR激动剂麻醉剂在神经发育和易损脑中的双重作用:从神经毒性到治疗作用。","authors":"Dihan Lu, Wen Zhang, Keyu Chen, Xia Feng","doi":"10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Debates regarding the specific effects of general anesthesia on developing brains have persisted for over 30 years. A consensus has been reached that prolonged, repeated, high-dose exposure to anesthetics is associated with a higher incidence of deficits in behavior and executive function, while single exposure has a relatively minor effect on long-term neurological function. In this review, we summarize the dose-dependent neuroprotective or neurotoxic effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor agonists, a representative group of sedatives, on developing brains or central nervous system diseases. Most preclinical research indicates that anesthetics have neurotoxic effects on the developing brain through various signal pathways. However, recent studies on low-dose anesthetics suggest that they may promote neurodevelopment during this critical period. These findings are incomprehensible for the general \"dose-effect\" principles of pharmacological research, which has attracted researchers' interest and led to the following questions: What is the threshold for the dual effects exerted by anesthetics such as propofol and sevoflurane on the developing brain? To what extent can their protective effects be maximized? What are the underlying mechanisms involved in these effects? Consequently, this issue has essentially become a \"mathematical problem.\" After summarizing the dose-dependent effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor agonist sedatives in both the developing brain and the brains of patients with central nervous system diseases, we believe that all such anesthetics exhibit specific threshold effects unique to each drug. These effects range from neuroprotection to neurotoxicity, depending on different brain functional states. However, the exact values of the specific thresholds for different drugs in various brain states, as well as the underlying mechanisms explaining why these thresholds exist, remain unclear. Further in-depth exploration of these issues could significantly enhance the therapeutic translational value of these anesthetics.</p>","PeriodicalId":19113,"journal":{"name":"Neural Regeneration Research","volume":" ","pages":"81-95"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual effects of GABA A R agonist anesthetics in neurodevelopment and vulnerable brains: From neurotoxic to therapeutic effects.\",\"authors\":\"Dihan Lu, Wen Zhang, Keyu Chen, Xia Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Debates regarding the specific effects of general anesthesia on developing brains have persisted for over 30 years. A consensus has been reached that prolonged, repeated, high-dose exposure to anesthetics is associated with a higher incidence of deficits in behavior and executive function, while single exposure has a relatively minor effect on long-term neurological function. In this review, we summarize the dose-dependent neuroprotective or neurotoxic effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor agonists, a representative group of sedatives, on developing brains or central nervous system diseases. Most preclinical research indicates that anesthetics have neurotoxic effects on the developing brain through various signal pathways. However, recent studies on low-dose anesthetics suggest that they may promote neurodevelopment during this critical period. These findings are incomprehensible for the general \\\"dose-effect\\\" principles of pharmacological research, which has attracted researchers' interest and led to the following questions: What is the threshold for the dual effects exerted by anesthetics such as propofol and sevoflurane on the developing brain? To what extent can their protective effects be maximized? What are the underlying mechanisms involved in these effects? Consequently, this issue has essentially become a \\\"mathematical problem.\\\" After summarizing the dose-dependent effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor agonist sedatives in both the developing brain and the brains of patients with central nervous system diseases, we believe that all such anesthetics exhibit specific threshold effects unique to each drug. These effects range from neuroprotection to neurotoxicity, depending on different brain functional states. However, the exact values of the specific thresholds for different drugs in various brain states, as well as the underlying mechanisms explaining why these thresholds exist, remain unclear. Further in-depth exploration of these issues could significantly enhance the therapeutic translational value of these anesthetics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neural Regeneration Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"81-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2026-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12094567/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neural Regeneration Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00828\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Regeneration Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-00828","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于全身麻醉对发育中的大脑的具体影响的争论已经持续了30多年。长期、重复、高剂量的麻醉药暴露与行为和执行功能缺陷的发生率较高有关,而单次暴露对长期神经功能的影响相对较小,这一共识已经达成。在这篇综述中,我们总结了γ -氨基丁酸A型受体激动剂(一组代表性的镇静剂)对发展中的大脑或中枢神经系统疾病的剂量依赖性神经保护或神经毒性作用。大多数临床前研究表明,麻醉剂通过各种信号通路对发育中的大脑产生神经毒性作用。然而,最近对低剂量麻醉剂的研究表明,它们可能促进这一关键时期的神经发育。这些发现对于药理学研究的一般“剂量效应”原则来说是无法理解的,这引起了研究人员的兴趣,并引发了以下问题:麻醉药如异丙酚和七氟醚对发育中的大脑产生双重作用的阈值是什么?它们的保护作用能在多大程度上最大化?这些影响的潜在机制是什么?因此,这个问题本质上已经变成了一个“数学问题”。在总结了γ -氨基丁酸A型受体激动剂镇静剂在发育中的大脑和中枢神经系统疾病患者的大脑中的剂量依赖性作用后,我们认为所有这些麻醉剂都表现出每种药物特有的特定阈值效应。这些影响范围从神经保护到神经毒性,取决于不同的大脑功能状态。然而,不同药物在不同大脑状态下的特定阈值的确切值,以及解释这些阈值存在的潜在机制,仍不清楚。进一步深入探讨这些问题,可以显著提高这些麻醉药的治疗转化价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dual effects of GABA A R agonist anesthetics in neurodevelopment and vulnerable brains: From neurotoxic to therapeutic effects.

Debates regarding the specific effects of general anesthesia on developing brains have persisted for over 30 years. A consensus has been reached that prolonged, repeated, high-dose exposure to anesthetics is associated with a higher incidence of deficits in behavior and executive function, while single exposure has a relatively minor effect on long-term neurological function. In this review, we summarize the dose-dependent neuroprotective or neurotoxic effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor agonists, a representative group of sedatives, on developing brains or central nervous system diseases. Most preclinical research indicates that anesthetics have neurotoxic effects on the developing brain through various signal pathways. However, recent studies on low-dose anesthetics suggest that they may promote neurodevelopment during this critical period. These findings are incomprehensible for the general "dose-effect" principles of pharmacological research, which has attracted researchers' interest and led to the following questions: What is the threshold for the dual effects exerted by anesthetics such as propofol and sevoflurane on the developing brain? To what extent can their protective effects be maximized? What are the underlying mechanisms involved in these effects? Consequently, this issue has essentially become a "mathematical problem." After summarizing the dose-dependent effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor agonist sedatives in both the developing brain and the brains of patients with central nervous system diseases, we believe that all such anesthetics exhibit specific threshold effects unique to each drug. These effects range from neuroprotection to neurotoxicity, depending on different brain functional states. However, the exact values of the specific thresholds for different drugs in various brain states, as well as the underlying mechanisms explaining why these thresholds exist, remain unclear. Further in-depth exploration of these issues could significantly enhance the therapeutic translational value of these anesthetics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neural Regeneration Research
Neural Regeneration Research CELL BIOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
515
审稿时长
1.0 months
期刊介绍: Neural Regeneration Research (NRR) is the Open Access journal specializing in neural regeneration and indexed by SCI-E and PubMed. The journal is committed to publishing articles on basic pathobiology of injury, repair and protection to the nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving traumatically injuried patients and patients with neurodegenerative diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信