连贯性和可理解性:大型语言模型预测外行对健康相关内容的理解。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Trevor Cohen , Weizhe Xu , Yue Guo , Serguei Pakhomov , Gondy Leroy
{"title":"连贯性和可理解性:大型语言模型预测外行对健康相关内容的理解。","authors":"Trevor Cohen ,&nbsp;Weizhe Xu ,&nbsp;Yue Guo ,&nbsp;Serguei Pakhomov ,&nbsp;Gondy Leroy","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Health literacy is a prerequisite to informed health-related decision making. To facilitate understanding of information, text should be presented at an appropriate reading level for the reader. Cognitive studies suggest that the coherence of a text – the interconnectedness between the ideas it expresses – is especially important for low-knowledge readers, who lack the background knowledge to draw inferences from text that is implicitly connected only. Prior work in cognitive science has yielded automated methods to estimate coherence. These methods estimate the <em>proximity</em> between text representations in a semantic vector space, with the underlying idea that units of text that are poorly connected will be further apart in this space. In addition, recent work with large language models (LLMs) has produced <em>probabilistic</em> methodological analogues that have yet to be evaluated for this purpose. This work concerns the relationship between these automated measures and layperson comprehension of biomedical text. To characterize this relationship, we applied a range of automated measures of text coherence to a set of text snippets, some of which were deliberately modified to improve their accessibility in a series of reading comprehension experiments. Results indicate significant associations between reader comprehension – as estimated using multiple-choice questions – and LLM-derived coherence metrics. Interventions designed to improve the comprehensibility of passages also improved their coherence, as measured with the best-performing LLM-derived models and shown by improved reader understanding of the text. These findings support the utility of LLM-derived measures of text coherence as a means to identify gaps in connectedness that make biomedical text difficult for laypeople to understand, with the potential to inform both manual and automated methods to improve the accessibility of the biomedical literature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 104758"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coherence and comprehensibility: Large language models predict lay understanding of health-related content\",\"authors\":\"Trevor Cohen ,&nbsp;Weizhe Xu ,&nbsp;Yue Guo ,&nbsp;Serguei Pakhomov ,&nbsp;Gondy Leroy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Health literacy is a prerequisite to informed health-related decision making. To facilitate understanding of information, text should be presented at an appropriate reading level for the reader. Cognitive studies suggest that the coherence of a text – the interconnectedness between the ideas it expresses – is especially important for low-knowledge readers, who lack the background knowledge to draw inferences from text that is implicitly connected only. Prior work in cognitive science has yielded automated methods to estimate coherence. These methods estimate the <em>proximity</em> between text representations in a semantic vector space, with the underlying idea that units of text that are poorly connected will be further apart in this space. In addition, recent work with large language models (LLMs) has produced <em>probabilistic</em> methodological analogues that have yet to be evaluated for this purpose. This work concerns the relationship between these automated measures and layperson comprehension of biomedical text. To characterize this relationship, we applied a range of automated measures of text coherence to a set of text snippets, some of which were deliberately modified to improve their accessibility in a series of reading comprehension experiments. Results indicate significant associations between reader comprehension – as estimated using multiple-choice questions – and LLM-derived coherence metrics. Interventions designed to improve the comprehensibility of passages also improved their coherence, as measured with the best-performing LLM-derived models and shown by improved reader understanding of the text. These findings support the utility of LLM-derived measures of text coherence as a means to identify gaps in connectedness that make biomedical text difficult for laypeople to understand, with the potential to inform both manual and automated methods to improve the accessibility of the biomedical literature.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104758\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S153204642400176X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S153204642400176X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生知识普及是作出与卫生有关的知情决策的先决条件。为了便于理解信息,文本应该以适合读者的阅读水平呈现。认知研究表明,文本的连贯性——即文本所表达的观点之间的相互联系——对低知识的读者来说尤为重要,因为他们缺乏背景知识,无法从只有隐含联系的文本中得出推论。认知科学先前的工作已经产生了估计连贯性的自动化方法。这些方法估计语义向量空间中文本表示之间的接近度,其基本思想是连接不良的文本单元在该空间中会进一步分开。此外,最近使用大型语言模型(llm)的工作已经产生了概率方法类似物,但尚未为此目的进行评估。这项工作涉及这些自动化措施和外行人对生物医学文本的理解之间的关系。为了描述这种关系,我们对一组文本片段应用了一系列文本连贯性的自动测量,其中一些片段在一系列阅读理解实验中被故意修改以提高其可访问性。结果表明,读者理解-估计使用多项选择题-和法学硕士衍生的连贯性指标之间的显著关联。旨在提高段落可理解性的干预措施也提高了它们的连贯性,正如用表现最好的法学硕士衍生模型所衡量的那样,并通过提高读者对文本的理解来显示。这些发现支持了法学硕士衍生的文本连贯性测量的效用,作为识别使外行难以理解的生物医学文本的连通性差距的一种手段,具有通知手动和自动化方法以提高生物医学文献的可及性的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Coherence and comprehensibility: Large language models predict lay understanding of health-related content

Coherence and comprehensibility: Large language models predict lay understanding of health-related content
Health literacy is a prerequisite to informed health-related decision making. To facilitate understanding of information, text should be presented at an appropriate reading level for the reader. Cognitive studies suggest that the coherence of a text – the interconnectedness between the ideas it expresses – is especially important for low-knowledge readers, who lack the background knowledge to draw inferences from text that is implicitly connected only. Prior work in cognitive science has yielded automated methods to estimate coherence. These methods estimate the proximity between text representations in a semantic vector space, with the underlying idea that units of text that are poorly connected will be further apart in this space. In addition, recent work with large language models (LLMs) has produced probabilistic methodological analogues that have yet to be evaluated for this purpose. This work concerns the relationship between these automated measures and layperson comprehension of biomedical text. To characterize this relationship, we applied a range of automated measures of text coherence to a set of text snippets, some of which were deliberately modified to improve their accessibility in a series of reading comprehension experiments. Results indicate significant associations between reader comprehension – as estimated using multiple-choice questions – and LLM-derived coherence metrics. Interventions designed to improve the comprehensibility of passages also improved their coherence, as measured with the best-performing LLM-derived models and shown by improved reader understanding of the text. These findings support the utility of LLM-derived measures of text coherence as a means to identify gaps in connectedness that make biomedical text difficult for laypeople to understand, with the potential to inform both manual and automated methods to improve the accessibility of the biomedical literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Journal of Biomedical Informatics 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信