hla -单倍体和匹配的兄弟姐妹供体造血干细胞移植的相似结果:一项多中心、回顾性研究和严重再生障碍性贫血移植特异性预后评分系统

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Mingyang Gao, Xiaobing Huang, Shichun Gao, Sanbin Wang, Jianchuan Deng, Yanqi Zhang, Peiyan Kong, Cheng Zhang, Li Gao, Yimei Feng, Lidan Zhu, Jia Liu, Ting Chen, Han Yao, Lu Wang, Huanfeng Liu, Yuqing Liu, Lu Zhao, Xi Zhang, Lei Gao
{"title":"hla -单倍体和匹配的兄弟姐妹供体造血干细胞移植的相似结果:一项多中心、回顾性研究和严重再生障碍性贫血移植特异性预后评分系统","authors":"Mingyang Gao, Xiaobing Huang, Shichun Gao, Sanbin Wang, Jianchuan Deng, Yanqi Zhang, Peiyan Kong, Cheng Zhang, Li Gao, Yimei Feng, Lidan Zhu, Jia Liu, Ting Chen, Han Yao, Lu Wang, Huanfeng Liu, Yuqing Liu, Lu Zhao, Xi Zhang, Lei Gao","doi":"10.1007/s00277-024-06051-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, great progress has been made in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) treatment for hematological malignant diseases because of the advent of novel conditioning regimens, optimized graft manipulation, improved graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and advances in supportive care. Recent studies have shown very favorable outcomes in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients, with comparable outcomes to those of patients receiving immune suppressive therapy (IST) and allogeneic HSCT from a matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD). However, most of the previous studies relied on single-center data analyses, and the conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis and supportive care used were relatively singular. We do not know whether there are differences in the survival of SAA patients after haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT under conditions involving different transplant centers, conditioning regimens and GVHD prophylaxis. This is a disease-specific, multicenter and retrospective study. We retrospectively studied 156 consecutive patients with SAA who underwent haplo-HSCT or MSD-HSCT at four transplant centers in China. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 87.5% in the haplo-HSCT group and 89.7% in the MSD-HSCT group. The time to hematopoietic reconstitution, incidence of graft versus host disease, and infection and graft failure rates were not significantly different between the groups. Haplo-HSCT achieved outcomes comparable to those of MSD-HSCT for SAA patients. According to the nomogram score, we developed a SAA prognostic scoring system. Haplo-HSCT should be considered an effective alternative for patients with SAA without a matched sibling donor. The SAA transplant-specific prognostic scoring system proposed in this study can conveniently predict the OS for SAA patients following MSD-HSCT or haplo-HSCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Similar outcomes between HLA-haploid and matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter, retrospective study and severe aplastic anemia transplant-specific prognostic scoring system.\",\"authors\":\"Mingyang Gao, Xiaobing Huang, Shichun Gao, Sanbin Wang, Jianchuan Deng, Yanqi Zhang, Peiyan Kong, Cheng Zhang, Li Gao, Yimei Feng, Lidan Zhu, Jia Liu, Ting Chen, Han Yao, Lu Wang, Huanfeng Liu, Yuqing Liu, Lu Zhao, Xi Zhang, Lei Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00277-024-06051-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In recent years, great progress has been made in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) treatment for hematological malignant diseases because of the advent of novel conditioning regimens, optimized graft manipulation, improved graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and advances in supportive care. Recent studies have shown very favorable outcomes in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients, with comparable outcomes to those of patients receiving immune suppressive therapy (IST) and allogeneic HSCT from a matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD). However, most of the previous studies relied on single-center data analyses, and the conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis and supportive care used were relatively singular. We do not know whether there are differences in the survival of SAA patients after haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT under conditions involving different transplant centers, conditioning regimens and GVHD prophylaxis. This is a disease-specific, multicenter and retrospective study. We retrospectively studied 156 consecutive patients with SAA who underwent haplo-HSCT or MSD-HSCT at four transplant centers in China. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 87.5% in the haplo-HSCT group and 89.7% in the MSD-HSCT group. The time to hematopoietic reconstitution, incidence of graft versus host disease, and infection and graft failure rates were not significantly different between the groups. Haplo-HSCT achieved outcomes comparable to those of MSD-HSCT for SAA patients. According to the nomogram score, we developed a SAA prognostic scoring system. Haplo-HSCT should be considered an effective alternative for patients with SAA without a matched sibling donor. The SAA transplant-specific prognostic scoring system proposed in this study can conveniently predict the OS for SAA patients following MSD-HSCT or haplo-HSCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-06051-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-06051-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,由于新的调节方案的出现、优化的移植物操作、改进的移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)预防以及支持治疗的进展,单倍体造血干细胞移植(haploo - hsct)治疗血液学恶性疾病取得了很大进展。最近的研究表明,严重再生障碍性贫血(SAA)患者的预后非常好,与接受免疫抑制治疗(IST)和来自匹配兄弟姐妹供体(MSD)或匹配非亲属供体(MUD)的同种异体造血干细胞移植的患者的预后相当。然而,先前的大多数研究依赖于单中心数据分析,并且使用的调节方案,GVHD预防和支持治疗相对单一。我们不知道在涉及不同移植中心、调节方案和GVHD预防的情况下,SAA患者在单倍hsct和MSD-HSCT后的生存率是否存在差异。这是一项针对特定疾病的多中心回顾性研究。我们回顾性研究了156例在中国4个移植中心接受单倍移植或单倍移植的SAA患者。单倍hsct组的5年总生存率(OS)为87.5%,MSD-HSCT组为89.7%。两组间造血重建时间、移植物抗宿主病发生率、感染和移植物失败率无显著差异。对于SAA患者,单倍hsct取得的结果与MSD-HSCT相当。根据nomogram评分,我们建立了SAA预后评分系统。对于没有匹配的兄弟姐妹供体的SAA患者,单倍造血干细胞移植应该被认为是一种有效的选择。本研究提出的SAA移植特异性预后评分系统可以方便地预测MSD-HSCT或单倍hsct后SAA患者的OS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Similar outcomes between HLA-haploid and matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter, retrospective study and severe aplastic anemia transplant-specific prognostic scoring system.

In recent years, great progress has been made in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) treatment for hematological malignant diseases because of the advent of novel conditioning regimens, optimized graft manipulation, improved graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and advances in supportive care. Recent studies have shown very favorable outcomes in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients, with comparable outcomes to those of patients receiving immune suppressive therapy (IST) and allogeneic HSCT from a matched sibling donor (MSD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD). However, most of the previous studies relied on single-center data analyses, and the conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis and supportive care used were relatively singular. We do not know whether there are differences in the survival of SAA patients after haplo-HSCT and MSD-HSCT under conditions involving different transplant centers, conditioning regimens and GVHD prophylaxis. This is a disease-specific, multicenter and retrospective study. We retrospectively studied 156 consecutive patients with SAA who underwent haplo-HSCT or MSD-HSCT at four transplant centers in China. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 87.5% in the haplo-HSCT group and 89.7% in the MSD-HSCT group. The time to hematopoietic reconstitution, incidence of graft versus host disease, and infection and graft failure rates were not significantly different between the groups. Haplo-HSCT achieved outcomes comparable to those of MSD-HSCT for SAA patients. According to the nomogram score, we developed a SAA prognostic scoring system. Haplo-HSCT should be considered an effective alternative for patients with SAA without a matched sibling donor. The SAA transplant-specific prognostic scoring system proposed in this study can conveniently predict the OS for SAA patients following MSD-HSCT or haplo-HSCT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Hematology
Annals of Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
304
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信