大宗订单下电力市场弹性需求的最优竞价

Makedon Karasavvidis;Dimitrios Papadaskalopoulos;Goran Strbac
{"title":"大宗订单下电力市场弹性需求的最优竞价","authors":"Makedon Karasavvidis;Dimitrios Papadaskalopoulos;Goran Strbac","doi":"10.1109/TEMPR.2024.3414988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although block orders are emerging as an interesting alternative to the multi-part offering / bidding paradigm, existing research on optimal participation in electricity markets employing block orders exhibits two critical limitations. Firstly, it has not focused on flexible demand (FD) participants, and, secondly, it has not explored exclusive groups (EGs), a block order type which is already employed in the European day-ahead market. This paper addresses these limitations by proposing a novel optimal bidding model for a price-taking, stand-alone FD participant, which optimizes the submitted EGs, while factoring realistic market regulations around block orders and the price uncertainty encountered by the participant. The proposed model is deployed to quantitatively support our hypothesis that EGs constitute a particularly valuable type of block orders for a FD participant, by comparing its resulting costs under the submission of simple hourly orders, independent profile block orders, and EGs. This is achieved through both illustrative, small-scale examples and more realistic large-scale and out-of-sample studies, while considering three different types of FD in order to demonstrate the general applicability of the proposed model.","PeriodicalId":100639,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation","volume":"2 4","pages":"488-502"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Bidding of Flexible Demand in Electricity Markets With Block Orders\",\"authors\":\"Makedon Karasavvidis;Dimitrios Papadaskalopoulos;Goran Strbac\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEMPR.2024.3414988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although block orders are emerging as an interesting alternative to the multi-part offering / bidding paradigm, existing research on optimal participation in electricity markets employing block orders exhibits two critical limitations. Firstly, it has not focused on flexible demand (FD) participants, and, secondly, it has not explored exclusive groups (EGs), a block order type which is already employed in the European day-ahead market. This paper addresses these limitations by proposing a novel optimal bidding model for a price-taking, stand-alone FD participant, which optimizes the submitted EGs, while factoring realistic market regulations around block orders and the price uncertainty encountered by the participant. The proposed model is deployed to quantitatively support our hypothesis that EGs constitute a particularly valuable type of block orders for a FD participant, by comparing its resulting costs under the submission of simple hourly orders, independent profile block orders, and EGs. This is achieved through both illustrative, small-scale examples and more realistic large-scale and out-of-sample studies, while considering three different types of FD in order to demonstrate the general applicability of the proposed model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"488-502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10557706/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy and Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10557706/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管大宗订单正在成为多部分供应/投标模式的有趣替代方案,但现有的关于采用大宗订单的电力市场最优参与的研究存在两个关键局限性。首先,它没有专注于灵活需求(FD)参与者,其次,它没有探索排他性团体(EGs),这是一种已经在欧洲日前市场采用的大宗订单类型。本文通过提出一种新的最优竞标模型来解决这些限制,该模型针对一个独立的定价FD参与者,该模型优化了提交的EGs,同时考虑了围绕大宗订单和参与者遇到的价格不确定性的现实市场规则。通过比较提交简单的小时订单、独立的概要订单和EGs的最终成本,我们部署了所提议的模型,以定量地支持我们的假设,即EGs构成了FD参与者特别有价值的区块订单类型。这是通过说明性的、小规模的例子和更现实的大规模和样本外研究来实现的,同时考虑了三种不同类型的FD,以证明所提出模型的一般适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal Bidding of Flexible Demand in Electricity Markets With Block Orders
Although block orders are emerging as an interesting alternative to the multi-part offering / bidding paradigm, existing research on optimal participation in electricity markets employing block orders exhibits two critical limitations. Firstly, it has not focused on flexible demand (FD) participants, and, secondly, it has not explored exclusive groups (EGs), a block order type which is already employed in the European day-ahead market. This paper addresses these limitations by proposing a novel optimal bidding model for a price-taking, stand-alone FD participant, which optimizes the submitted EGs, while factoring realistic market regulations around block orders and the price uncertainty encountered by the participant. The proposed model is deployed to quantitatively support our hypothesis that EGs constitute a particularly valuable type of block orders for a FD participant, by comparing its resulting costs under the submission of simple hourly orders, independent profile block orders, and EGs. This is achieved through both illustrative, small-scale examples and more realistic large-scale and out-of-sample studies, while considering three different types of FD in order to demonstrate the general applicability of the proposed model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信