男性非手术刀输精管结扎术后睾丸痛的回顾性评价。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Michael Morra, Karim Sidhom, Harliv Dhillon, Jasmir G Nayak, Premal Patel
{"title":"男性非手术刀输精管结扎术后睾丸痛的回顾性评价。","authors":"Michael Morra, Karim Sidhom, Harliv Dhillon, Jasmir G Nayak, Premal Patel","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vasectomy is a form of permanent contraception in men that is safe and effective. Complications are relatively uncommon, although patients may experience postoperative pain. Current literature quotes a broad range in the incidence of chronic orchialgia following no-scalpel vasectomy from 0.6-26%, while pain negatively affecting quality of life is about 1-2%. We sought to evaluate our incidence of post-vasectomy pain and surgical management for this pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed for all men who underwent a vasectomy at Men's Health Clinic Manitoba during a 22-month period. The presence of pain or complications was collected at a three-month followup appointment. Patients with pain were then followed every 6-8 weeks for continued assessment and management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 350 men underwent elective no-scalpel vasectomy during this period. The majority of patients had no previous history of orchialgia (98%) or history of previous scrotal surgery (93%). At three months post-vasectomy, 38/350 (11%) of patients had ongoing pain and one patient required surgery (epididymectomy) for management of post-vasectomy pain syndrome three months following vasectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our retrospective analysis of 350 men who underwent no scalpel vasectomy shows a significant proportion of post-vasectomy pain at the three-month followup appointment, although most cases are resolving or minor and only one patient has required surgical management. This highlights the importance of counseling men undergoing vasectomy regarding the risks of post-procedure orchialgia and the small proportion of men who will require additional surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective evaluation of post-surgical orchialgia in men undergoing no-scalpel vasectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Morra, Karim Sidhom, Harliv Dhillon, Jasmir G Nayak, Premal Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.5489/cuaj.8937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vasectomy is a form of permanent contraception in men that is safe and effective. Complications are relatively uncommon, although patients may experience postoperative pain. Current literature quotes a broad range in the incidence of chronic orchialgia following no-scalpel vasectomy from 0.6-26%, while pain negatively affecting quality of life is about 1-2%. We sought to evaluate our incidence of post-vasectomy pain and surgical management for this pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was performed for all men who underwent a vasectomy at Men's Health Clinic Manitoba during a 22-month period. The presence of pain or complications was collected at a three-month followup appointment. Patients with pain were then followed every 6-8 weeks for continued assessment and management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 350 men underwent elective no-scalpel vasectomy during this period. The majority of patients had no previous history of orchialgia (98%) or history of previous scrotal surgery (93%). At three months post-vasectomy, 38/350 (11%) of patients had ongoing pain and one patient required surgery (epididymectomy) for management of post-vasectomy pain syndrome three months following vasectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our retrospective analysis of 350 men who underwent no scalpel vasectomy shows a significant proportion of post-vasectomy pain at the three-month followup appointment, although most cases are resolving or minor and only one patient has required surgical management. This highlights the importance of counseling men undergoing vasectomy regarding the risks of post-procedure orchialgia and the small proportion of men who will require additional surgical intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8937\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

输精管结扎术是一种安全有效的男性永久性避孕方法。并发症相对少见,尽管患者可能会经历术后疼痛。目前文献显示,无刀输精管结扎术后慢性睾丸痛的发生率为0.6-26%,而疼痛对生活质量的负面影响约为1-2%。我们试图评估输精管结扎术后疼痛的发生率和这种疼痛的手术治疗。方法:对22个月期间在曼尼托巴省男性健康诊所接受输精管切除术的所有男性进行回顾性图表回顾。在三个月的随访中收集疼痛或并发症的存在情况。疼痛患者每6-8周随访一次,继续进行评估和处理。结果:在此期间,共有350名男性接受了非手术刀输精管切除术。大多数患者无睾丸痛史(98%)或既往阴囊手术史(93%)。输精管切除术后3个月,38/350(11%)的患者持续疼痛,1例患者在输精管切除术后3个月需要手术(附睾切除术)来治疗输精管切除术后疼痛综合征。结论:我们对350名未行输精管结扎手术的男性进行回顾性分析,发现在三个月的随访中,输精管结扎后疼痛的比例很大,尽管大多数病例都缓解或轻微,只有1名患者需要手术治疗。这突出了对接受输精管结扎术的男性进行手术后睾丸痛风险咨询的重要性,以及一小部分需要额外手术干预的男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective evaluation of post-surgical orchialgia in men undergoing no-scalpel vasectomy.

Introduction: Vasectomy is a form of permanent contraception in men that is safe and effective. Complications are relatively uncommon, although patients may experience postoperative pain. Current literature quotes a broad range in the incidence of chronic orchialgia following no-scalpel vasectomy from 0.6-26%, while pain negatively affecting quality of life is about 1-2%. We sought to evaluate our incidence of post-vasectomy pain and surgical management for this pain.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for all men who underwent a vasectomy at Men's Health Clinic Manitoba during a 22-month period. The presence of pain or complications was collected at a three-month followup appointment. Patients with pain were then followed every 6-8 weeks for continued assessment and management.

Results: A total of 350 men underwent elective no-scalpel vasectomy during this period. The majority of patients had no previous history of orchialgia (98%) or history of previous scrotal surgery (93%). At three months post-vasectomy, 38/350 (11%) of patients had ongoing pain and one patient required surgery (epididymectomy) for management of post-vasectomy pain syndrome three months following vasectomy.

Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis of 350 men who underwent no scalpel vasectomy shows a significant proportion of post-vasectomy pain at the three-month followup appointment, although most cases are resolving or minor and only one patient has required surgical management. This highlights the importance of counseling men undergoing vasectomy regarding the risks of post-procedure orchialgia and the small proportion of men who will require additional surgical intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信