解锁英国健康数据的承诺:考虑慈善全科医生数据信托的情况。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q1 LAW
Caroline A B Redhead, Catherine Bowden, John Ainsworth, Nigel Burns, James Cunningham, Søren Holm, Sarah Devaney
{"title":"解锁英国健康数据的承诺:考虑慈善全科医生数据信托的情况。","authors":"Caroline A B Redhead, Catherine Bowden, John Ainsworth, Nigel Burns, James Cunningham, Søren Holm, Sarah Devaney","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwae043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The UK National Health Service general practice (GP) patient data constitute a rich research resource, but collecting, managing, and sharing patient data present challenges. In May 2021, to address these challenges, substantial changes to the system for processing pseudonymized GP patient data in England were announced. As part of an opt-out process, patient consent to sharing GP data was deemed to have been given. However, when over a million people quickly acted to opt out of the new system, the process was paused, and an engagement exercise commenced, whose aim was to inform a re-designed programme addressing patient concerns. In this article, we present and discuss the findings of the General Practice Data Trust pilot study, which has investigated people's reasons for opting out of sharing their data, and, looking for practical solutions to their concerns, has discussed with participants the concept of a 'data trust' to manage the sharing of patient data. Making a conceptual argument for the use of the (relatively new) charitable incorporated organization as a governance model for a GP data trust, we demonstrate how this could address patients' concerns and represent a more attractive means of stewarding GP data for research and service planning purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlocking the promise of UK health data: considering the case for a charitable GP data trust.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline A B Redhead, Catherine Bowden, John Ainsworth, Nigel Burns, James Cunningham, Søren Holm, Sarah Devaney\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/medlaw/fwae043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The UK National Health Service general practice (GP) patient data constitute a rich research resource, but collecting, managing, and sharing patient data present challenges. In May 2021, to address these challenges, substantial changes to the system for processing pseudonymized GP patient data in England were announced. As part of an opt-out process, patient consent to sharing GP data was deemed to have been given. However, when over a million people quickly acted to opt out of the new system, the process was paused, and an engagement exercise commenced, whose aim was to inform a re-designed programme addressing patient concerns. In this article, we present and discuss the findings of the General Practice Data Trust pilot study, which has investigated people's reasons for opting out of sharing their data, and, looking for practical solutions to their concerns, has discussed with participants the concept of a 'data trust' to manage the sharing of patient data. Making a conceptual argument for the use of the (relatively new) charitable incorporated organization as a governance model for a GP data trust, we demonstrate how this could address patients' concerns and represent a more attractive means of stewarding GP data for research and service planning purposes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11706794/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwae043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwae043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国国家卫生服务全科医生(GP)患者数据构成了丰富的研究资源,但收集、管理和共享患者数据存在挑战。2021年5月,为了应对这些挑战,英国宣布对处理假名GP患者数据的系统进行重大更改。作为选择退出过程的一部分,患者同意共享全科医生数据被视为已经给予。然而,当超过100万人迅速采取行动选择退出新系统时,这一进程被暂停,并开始了一项参与活动,其目的是为重新设计的方案提供信息,以解决患者的问题。在本文中,我们介绍并讨论了全科医生数据信任试点研究的结果,该研究调查了人们选择不共享数据的原因,并为他们的担忧寻找切实可行的解决方案,与参与者讨论了“数据信任”的概念,以管理患者数据的共享。我们对使用(相对较新的)慈善合并组织作为全科医生数据信托的治理模型进行了概念性论证,展示了这如何解决患者的问题,并代表了一种更有吸引力的管理全科医生数据的方法,用于研究和服务规划目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unlocking the promise of UK health data: considering the case for a charitable GP data trust.

The UK National Health Service general practice (GP) patient data constitute a rich research resource, but collecting, managing, and sharing patient data present challenges. In May 2021, to address these challenges, substantial changes to the system for processing pseudonymized GP patient data in England were announced. As part of an opt-out process, patient consent to sharing GP data was deemed to have been given. However, when over a million people quickly acted to opt out of the new system, the process was paused, and an engagement exercise commenced, whose aim was to inform a re-designed programme addressing patient concerns. In this article, we present and discuss the findings of the General Practice Data Trust pilot study, which has investigated people's reasons for opting out of sharing their data, and, looking for practical solutions to their concerns, has discussed with participants the concept of a 'data trust' to manage the sharing of patient data. Making a conceptual argument for the use of the (relatively new) charitable incorporated organization as a governance model for a GP data trust, we demonstrate how this could address patients' concerns and represent a more attractive means of stewarding GP data for research and service planning purposes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Law Review
Medical Law Review MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Law Review is established as an authoritative source of reference for academics, lawyers, legal and medical practitioners, law students, and anyone interested in healthcare and the law. The journal presents articles of international interest which provide thorough analyses and comment on the wide range of topical issues that are fundamental to this expanding area of law. In addition, commentary sections provide in depth explorations of topical aspects of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信