英格兰初级保健中贫血检测的流行程度和模式。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Margaret Smith, Cynthia Wright-Drakesmith, Sarah Haynes, Suzanne Maynard, Akshay Shah, Noemi Ba Roy, Joseph Lee, Katja Maurer, Simon J Stanworth, Clare Bankhead
{"title":"英格兰初级保健中贫血检测的流行程度和模式。","authors":"Margaret Smith, Cynthia Wright-Drakesmith, Sarah Haynes, Suzanne Maynard, Akshay Shah, Noemi Ba Roy, Joseph Lee, Katja Maurer, Simon J Stanworth, Clare Bankhead","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Despite epidemiological data on anaemia being available on a global scale, its prevalence in the United Kingdom is not well described. <b>Aim</b> To investigate anaemia prevalence and testing patterns for haemoglobin and other blood parameters. <b>Design and Setting</b> A population-based cohort study using data drawn from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database in 2019. <b>Method</b> We extracted demographic data for each person who was registered at their current practice during 2019, including linked data on Index of Multiple Deprivation. We calculated anaemia prevalence in 2019 based on World Health Organization specified age and gender thresholds for haemoglobin. We classified anaemia based on mean corpuscular volume and ferritin. We followed up people with anaemia for up to one year to investigate longitudinal testing patterns for haemoglobin. <b>Results</b> The cohort contained 14 million people. Anaemia prevalence in 2019 was 4.1% (5.1 % females and 3.1% males). Prevalence was higher in people aged >65 years, Black and Asian ethnicities, and people living in areas with higher social deprivation. Only half of people with anaemia and a mean corpuscular volume of ≤100 fL had an accompanying ferritin value recorded. About half of people with anaemia had a follow-up haemoglobin test within one-year, most of which still indicated anaemia. <b>Conclusion</b> Anaemia is prevalent in the UK with large disparities between levels of demographic variables. Investigation and follow-up of anaemia is suboptimal in many patients. Health interventions aimed at improving anaemia investigation and treatment are needed, particularly in these at-risk groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and patterns of testing for anaemia in primary care in England.\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Smith, Cynthia Wright-Drakesmith, Sarah Haynes, Suzanne Maynard, Akshay Shah, Noemi Ba Roy, Joseph Lee, Katja Maurer, Simon J Stanworth, Clare Bankhead\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b> Despite epidemiological data on anaemia being available on a global scale, its prevalence in the United Kingdom is not well described. <b>Aim</b> To investigate anaemia prevalence and testing patterns for haemoglobin and other blood parameters. <b>Design and Setting</b> A population-based cohort study using data drawn from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database in 2019. <b>Method</b> We extracted demographic data for each person who was registered at their current practice during 2019, including linked data on Index of Multiple Deprivation. We calculated anaemia prevalence in 2019 based on World Health Organization specified age and gender thresholds for haemoglobin. We classified anaemia based on mean corpuscular volume and ferritin. We followed up people with anaemia for up to one year to investigate longitudinal testing patterns for haemoglobin. <b>Results</b> The cohort contained 14 million people. Anaemia prevalence in 2019 was 4.1% (5.1 % females and 3.1% males). Prevalence was higher in people aged >65 years, Black and Asian ethnicities, and people living in areas with higher social deprivation. Only half of people with anaemia and a mean corpuscular volume of ≤100 fL had an accompanying ferritin value recorded. About half of people with anaemia had a follow-up haemoglobin test within one-year, most of which still indicated anaemia. <b>Conclusion</b> Anaemia is prevalent in the UK with large disparities between levels of demographic variables. Investigation and follow-up of anaemia is suboptimal in many patients. Health interventions aimed at improving anaemia investigation and treatment are needed, particularly in these at-risk groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0336\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在全球范围内有关于贫血的流行病学数据,但其在英国的流行情况并没有得到很好的描述。目的了解贫血的流行情况及血红蛋白和其他血液参数的检测模式。设计与设置一项基于人群的队列研究,数据来自2019年临床实践研究数据链Aurum数据库。方法:我们提取了2019年期间在当前诊所登记的每个人的人口统计数据,包括多重剥夺指数的相关数据。我们根据世界卫生组织规定的血红蛋白年龄和性别阈值计算了2019年的贫血患病率。我们根据平均红细胞体积和铁蛋白对贫血进行分类。我们对贫血患者进行了长达一年的随访,以调查血红蛋白的纵向检测模式。结果该队列包含1400万人。2019年贫血患病率为4.1%(女性5.1%,男性3.1%)。65岁以下人群、黑人和亚洲族裔以及生活在社会剥夺程度较高地区的人群患病率较高。只有一半贫血且平均红细胞体积≤100 fL的患者记录了伴随的铁蛋白值。大约一半的贫血患者在一年内进行了后续的血红蛋白测试,其中大多数仍然表明贫血。结论:贫血在英国普遍存在,人口统计变量之间存在较大差异。贫血的调查和随访在许多患者中是不理想的。需要采取旨在改善贫血调查和治疗的保健干预措施,特别是在这些高危群体中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence and patterns of testing for anaemia in primary care in England.

Background Despite epidemiological data on anaemia being available on a global scale, its prevalence in the United Kingdom is not well described. Aim To investigate anaemia prevalence and testing patterns for haemoglobin and other blood parameters. Design and Setting A population-based cohort study using data drawn from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum database in 2019. Method We extracted demographic data for each person who was registered at their current practice during 2019, including linked data on Index of Multiple Deprivation. We calculated anaemia prevalence in 2019 based on World Health Organization specified age and gender thresholds for haemoglobin. We classified anaemia based on mean corpuscular volume and ferritin. We followed up people with anaemia for up to one year to investigate longitudinal testing patterns for haemoglobin. Results The cohort contained 14 million people. Anaemia prevalence in 2019 was 4.1% (5.1 % females and 3.1% males). Prevalence was higher in people aged >65 years, Black and Asian ethnicities, and people living in areas with higher social deprivation. Only half of people with anaemia and a mean corpuscular volume of ≤100 fL had an accompanying ferritin value recorded. About half of people with anaemia had a follow-up haemoglobin test within one-year, most of which still indicated anaemia. Conclusion Anaemia is prevalent in the UK with large disparities between levels of demographic variables. Investigation and follow-up of anaemia is suboptimal in many patients. Health interventions aimed at improving anaemia investigation and treatment are needed, particularly in these at-risk groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信