抗着丝粒抗体阳性的弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症患者的表型:系统文献综述和荟萃分析。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Marco Binda, Augusta Ortolan, Beatrice Moccaldi, Mariangela Salvato, Anna Cuberli, Roberto Padoan, Andrea Doria, Elisabetta Zanatta
{"title":"抗着丝粒抗体阳性的弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症患者的表型:系统文献综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Marco Binda, Augusta Ortolan, Beatrice Moccaldi, Mariangela Salvato, Anna Cuberli, Roberto Padoan, Andrea Doria, Elisabetta Zanatta","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Anticentromere antibodies (ACA) are typically found in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc), whereas patients with anti-topoisomerase I antibodies (ATA) usually exhibit diffuse cutaneous involvement (dcSSc). We aimed to investigate the clinical phenotype and outcome of ACA-dcSSc.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted (January 1970 to April 2023) across MEDLINE, Scopus and OVID, to define whether SSc patients (population) within the ACA-dcSSc subset (exposure) had higher/lower risk for major organ involvement (interstitial lung disease-ILD, pulmonary hypertension-PH, primary myocardial involvement-PMI, scleroderma renal crisis-SRC) and mortality (outcomes) compared to ACA-lcSSc and ATA-dcSSc. Inclusion criteria were: 1) adult SSc patients with identifiable demographic and clinical features by subtype; 2) observational studies. The quality of the studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compare odds ratios (OR) for major organ involvement, and the 5- and 10-year mortality of ACA-dcSSc with the other subsets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1570 hits, six articles were included, identifying 177 ACA-dcSSc patients. In ACA-dcSSc, ILD was more frequent than in ACA-lcSSc (OR 2.60; 95 %CI 1.39-4.87) but less frequent compared to ATA-dcSSc (OR 0.17; 95 %CI 0.10-0.29). ACA-dcSSc patients had a higher prevalence of PH vs. both conventional subsets; PMI and SRC were more frequent in ACA-dcSSc compared to ACA-lcSSc, and similar to ATA-dcSSc. While 5-year survival rates were comparable among the subsets, ACA-dcSSc patients exhibited a lower 10-year mortality than ATA-dcSSc (OR 0.42; 95 %CI 0.2-0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although uncommon, the ACA-dcSSc subset appears to have a distinct clinical phenotype, with a better prognosis than ATA-dcSSc.</p>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"70 ","pages":"152606"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phenotype of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients with positive anticentromere antibodies: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Binda, Augusta Ortolan, Beatrice Moccaldi, Mariangela Salvato, Anna Cuberli, Roberto Padoan, Andrea Doria, Elisabetta Zanatta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Anticentromere antibodies (ACA) are typically found in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc), whereas patients with anti-topoisomerase I antibodies (ATA) usually exhibit diffuse cutaneous involvement (dcSSc). We aimed to investigate the clinical phenotype and outcome of ACA-dcSSc.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted (January 1970 to April 2023) across MEDLINE, Scopus and OVID, to define whether SSc patients (population) within the ACA-dcSSc subset (exposure) had higher/lower risk for major organ involvement (interstitial lung disease-ILD, pulmonary hypertension-PH, primary myocardial involvement-PMI, scleroderma renal crisis-SRC) and mortality (outcomes) compared to ACA-lcSSc and ATA-dcSSc. Inclusion criteria were: 1) adult SSc patients with identifiable demographic and clinical features by subtype; 2) observational studies. The quality of the studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compare odds ratios (OR) for major organ involvement, and the 5- and 10-year mortality of ACA-dcSSc with the other subsets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1570 hits, six articles were included, identifying 177 ACA-dcSSc patients. In ACA-dcSSc, ILD was more frequent than in ACA-lcSSc (OR 2.60; 95 %CI 1.39-4.87) but less frequent compared to ATA-dcSSc (OR 0.17; 95 %CI 0.10-0.29). ACA-dcSSc patients had a higher prevalence of PH vs. both conventional subsets; PMI and SRC were more frequent in ACA-dcSSc compared to ACA-lcSSc, and similar to ATA-dcSSc. While 5-year survival rates were comparable among the subsets, ACA-dcSSc patients exhibited a lower 10-year mortality than ATA-dcSSc (OR 0.42; 95 %CI 0.2-0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although uncommon, the ACA-dcSSc subset appears to have a distinct clinical phenotype, with a better prognosis than ATA-dcSSc.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"152606\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152606\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:抗着丝粒抗体(ACA)通常在局限性皮肤系统性硬化症(lcSSc)中发现,而抗拓扑异构酶I抗体(ATA)患者通常表现为弥漫性皮肤累及(dcSSc)。我们的目的是研究ACA-dcSSc的临床表型和预后。方法:通过MEDLINE、Scopus和OVID(1970年1月至2023年4月)进行了系统的文献综述,以确定与ACA-lcSSc和ATA-dcSSc相比,ACA-dcSSc亚群(暴露)中的SSc患者(人群)是否具有更高/更低的主要器官受损伤风险(间质性肺疾病ild、肺动脉高压- ph、原发性心肌受损伤- pmi、硬皮病肾危像- src)和死亡率(结局)。纳入标准为:1)按亚型有明确的人口统计学和临床特征的成人SSc患者;2)观察性研究。研究的质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。进行随机效应荟萃分析,比较ACA-dcSSc与其他亚型的主要器官受损伤的优势比(OR)以及5年和10年死亡率。结果:在1570次点击中,纳入6篇文章,确定了177例ACA-dcSSc患者。ACA-dcSSc中ILD发生率高于ACA-lcSSc (OR 2.60;95% CI 1.39-4.87),但与ATA-dcSSc相比发生率较低(OR 0.17;95% ci 0.10-0.29)。ACA-dcSSc患者的PH患病率高于两个常规亚群;与ACA-lcSSc相比,ACA-dcSSc中PMI和SRC的发生率更高,与ATA-dcSSc相似。虽然各亚群的5年生存率具有可比性,但ACA-dcSSc患者的10年死亡率低于ATA-dcSSc (OR 0.42;95% ci 0.2-0.85)。结论:ACA-dcSSc虽然不常见,但其临床表型明显,预后优于ATA-dcSSc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phenotype of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis patients with positive anticentromere antibodies: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Objectives: Anticentromere antibodies (ACA) are typically found in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc), whereas patients with anti-topoisomerase I antibodies (ATA) usually exhibit diffuse cutaneous involvement (dcSSc). We aimed to investigate the clinical phenotype and outcome of ACA-dcSSc.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted (January 1970 to April 2023) across MEDLINE, Scopus and OVID, to define whether SSc patients (population) within the ACA-dcSSc subset (exposure) had higher/lower risk for major organ involvement (interstitial lung disease-ILD, pulmonary hypertension-PH, primary myocardial involvement-PMI, scleroderma renal crisis-SRC) and mortality (outcomes) compared to ACA-lcSSc and ATA-dcSSc. Inclusion criteria were: 1) adult SSc patients with identifiable demographic and clinical features by subtype; 2) observational studies. The quality of the studies was evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to compare odds ratios (OR) for major organ involvement, and the 5- and 10-year mortality of ACA-dcSSc with the other subsets.

Results: Out of 1570 hits, six articles were included, identifying 177 ACA-dcSSc patients. In ACA-dcSSc, ILD was more frequent than in ACA-lcSSc (OR 2.60; 95 %CI 1.39-4.87) but less frequent compared to ATA-dcSSc (OR 0.17; 95 %CI 0.10-0.29). ACA-dcSSc patients had a higher prevalence of PH vs. both conventional subsets; PMI and SRC were more frequent in ACA-dcSSc compared to ACA-lcSSc, and similar to ATA-dcSSc. While 5-year survival rates were comparable among the subsets, ACA-dcSSc patients exhibited a lower 10-year mortality than ATA-dcSSc (OR 0.42; 95 %CI 0.2-0.85).

Conclusion: Although uncommon, the ACA-dcSSc subset appears to have a distinct clinical phenotype, with a better prognosis than ATA-dcSSc.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信