胃肠道恶性肿瘤新辅助治疗中患者报告的预后与手术损耗之间的关系。

IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Alexander H Shannon, Marilly Palettas, Angela Sarna, Emily Huang, Peter J Kneuertz, Mary Dillhoff, Aslam Ejaz, Timothy M Pawlik, Jordan M Cloyd
{"title":"胃肠道恶性肿瘤新辅助治疗中患者报告的预后与手术损耗之间的关系。","authors":"Alexander H Shannon, Marilly Palettas, Angela Sarna, Emily Huang, Peter J Kneuertz, Mary Dillhoff, Aslam Ejaz, Timothy M Pawlik, Jordan M Cloyd","doi":"10.1007/s12029-024-01153-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is increasingly used for gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancers. Risk factors for surgical attrition during NT are poorly understood. A planned secondary analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing NT was performed to identify factors associated with surgical attrition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with GI/HPB cancer receiving NT were provided a mobile phone application administering QOL assessments every 30 days and measuring mood/symptoms until NT completion. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine the association between demographic, clinical characteristics, and PROs with surgical attrition (no surgery (NS) versus surgery or watchful waiting (SWW)). Mixed-effects regression models evaluated trends of QOL and symptoms between the cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 104 enrolled patients, mean age was 60.5 ± 11.5 years, 57 (55%) were male, and 95 (91%) were Caucasian. After a mean duration of 3.4 months of NT, 76 (73%) patients underwent SWW, while 28 (27%) did not (NS). Cancer type (HPB vs GI, OR 7.0, CI 2.7-19.3, p < 0.001), comorbidities (OR 1.72, CI 1.0-2.99, p = 0.05), and severe complications during NT (OR 4.2, CI 1.2-15.3, p = 0.03) were associated with NS. There were no differences between longitudinal QOL scores or PROs among patients who underwent SWW versus NS except for the lack of appetite, which was associated with NS (OR 3.6, CI 1.0-12.2, p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients undergoing NT for GI/HPB malignancies, type of cancer, comorbidities, and severe complications during NT were associated with failure to undergo surgery, whereas QOL and PROs were largely not.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Surgical Attrition During Neoadjuvant Therapy for Gastrointestinal Malignancies.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander H Shannon, Marilly Palettas, Angela Sarna, Emily Huang, Peter J Kneuertz, Mary Dillhoff, Aslam Ejaz, Timothy M Pawlik, Jordan M Cloyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12029-024-01153-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is increasingly used for gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancers. Risk factors for surgical attrition during NT are poorly understood. A planned secondary analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing NT was performed to identify factors associated with surgical attrition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with GI/HPB cancer receiving NT were provided a mobile phone application administering QOL assessments every 30 days and measuring mood/symptoms until NT completion. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine the association between demographic, clinical characteristics, and PROs with surgical attrition (no surgery (NS) versus surgery or watchful waiting (SWW)). Mixed-effects regression models evaluated trends of QOL and symptoms between the cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 104 enrolled patients, mean age was 60.5 ± 11.5 years, 57 (55%) were male, and 95 (91%) were Caucasian. After a mean duration of 3.4 months of NT, 76 (73%) patients underwent SWW, while 28 (27%) did not (NS). Cancer type (HPB vs GI, OR 7.0, CI 2.7-19.3, p < 0.001), comorbidities (OR 1.72, CI 1.0-2.99, p = 0.05), and severe complications during NT (OR 4.2, CI 1.2-15.3, p = 0.03) were associated with NS. There were no differences between longitudinal QOL scores or PROs among patients who underwent SWW versus NS except for the lack of appetite, which was associated with NS (OR 3.6, CI 1.0-12.2, p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients undergoing NT for GI/HPB malignancies, type of cancer, comorbidities, and severe complications during NT were associated with failure to undergo surgery, whereas QOL and PROs were largely not.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01153-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-024-01153-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:新辅助治疗(NT)越来越多地用于胃肠道(GI)和肝胆管(HPB)肿瘤。NT手术磨耗的危险因素了解甚少。一项前瞻性队列研究对接受NT手术的患者报告的结果(PROs)进行了计划中的二次分析,以确定与手术磨耗相关的因素。方法:为接受NT治疗的成年GI/HPB癌症患者提供手机应用程序,每30天评估一次生活质量,并测量情绪/症状,直到NT完成。进行单因素和多因素logistic回归,以确定人口统计学、临床特征和PROs与手术减员(不手术(NS)与手术或观察等待(SWW))之间的关系。混合效应回归模型评估各组间生活质量和症状的趋势。结果:104例入组患者的平均年龄为60.5±11.5岁,男性57例(55%),白种人95例(91%)。在平均3.4个月的NT治疗后,76名(73%)患者接受了SWW治疗,而28名(27%)患者没有(NS)。结论:在因GI/HPB恶性肿瘤而接受NT的患者中,肿瘤类型、合并症和NT期间的严重并发症与手术失败相关,而QOL和PROs在很大程度上与手术失败无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Association Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Surgical Attrition During Neoadjuvant Therapy for Gastrointestinal Malignancies.

Purpose: Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is increasingly used for gastrointestinal (GI) and hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancers. Risk factors for surgical attrition during NT are poorly understood. A planned secondary analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing NT was performed to identify factors associated with surgical attrition.

Methods: Adult patients with GI/HPB cancer receiving NT were provided a mobile phone application administering QOL assessments every 30 days and measuring mood/symptoms until NT completion. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to determine the association between demographic, clinical characteristics, and PROs with surgical attrition (no surgery (NS) versus surgery or watchful waiting (SWW)). Mixed-effects regression models evaluated trends of QOL and symptoms between the cohorts.

Results: Among 104 enrolled patients, mean age was 60.5 ± 11.5 years, 57 (55%) were male, and 95 (91%) were Caucasian. After a mean duration of 3.4 months of NT, 76 (73%) patients underwent SWW, while 28 (27%) did not (NS). Cancer type (HPB vs GI, OR 7.0, CI 2.7-19.3, p < 0.001), comorbidities (OR 1.72, CI 1.0-2.99, p = 0.05), and severe complications during NT (OR 4.2, CI 1.2-15.3, p = 0.03) were associated with NS. There were no differences between longitudinal QOL scores or PROs among patients who underwent SWW versus NS except for the lack of appetite, which was associated with NS (OR 3.6, CI 1.0-12.2, p = 0.04).

Conclusions: Among patients undergoing NT for GI/HPB malignancies, type of cancer, comorbidities, and severe complications during NT were associated with failure to undergo surgery, whereas QOL and PROs were largely not.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology:  This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信