Giulio M Mondellini, Antoon J M van den Enden, Nicolas M Van Mieghem
{"title":"为什么危险休克是心源性休克中机械循环支持的第一个积极试验的观点。","authors":"Giulio M Mondellini, Antoon J M van den Enden, Nicolas M Van Mieghem","doi":"10.1007/s10741-024-10470-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiogenic shock related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) remains a severe condition associated with a high risk of mortality despite increased availability of primary percutaneous coronary intervention and improvements in pharmacologic and device-based therapy. The results of the DanGer Shock trial stand out compared with the outcomes of the previous trials and mark the first mechanical circulatory support (MCS) strategy to show a benefit in patients with AMI-CS, a population that has always been challenging to study. Notably, negative findings from previous trials may mask positive treatment effects in specific subgroups and patient category. We systematically reviewed the design of all contemporary randomized controlled AMI-CS trials and identified four distinct features, which likely provide reasons why DanGer Shock became the first positive randomized controlled trial to support MCS in AMI-CS. DanGer Shock was the first RCT that established MCS in the context of AMI-CS. Key features were (1) patient phenotype that 1) includes STEMI and 2) excludes severe RV failure and persistent comatose state after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; (3) optimal timing of MCS deployment, as soon as possible (lower SCAI stage) and before revascularization efforts; and (4) rigorous intensive care management protocols on hemodynamic and MCS monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":12950,"journal":{"name":"Heart Failure Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"381-385"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives on why DanGer Shock is the first positive trial on mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.\",\"authors\":\"Giulio M Mondellini, Antoon J M van den Enden, Nicolas M Van Mieghem\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10741-024-10470-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cardiogenic shock related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) remains a severe condition associated with a high risk of mortality despite increased availability of primary percutaneous coronary intervention and improvements in pharmacologic and device-based therapy. The results of the DanGer Shock trial stand out compared with the outcomes of the previous trials and mark the first mechanical circulatory support (MCS) strategy to show a benefit in patients with AMI-CS, a population that has always been challenging to study. Notably, negative findings from previous trials may mask positive treatment effects in specific subgroups and patient category. We systematically reviewed the design of all contemporary randomized controlled AMI-CS trials and identified four distinct features, which likely provide reasons why DanGer Shock became the first positive randomized controlled trial to support MCS in AMI-CS. DanGer Shock was the first RCT that established MCS in the context of AMI-CS. Key features were (1) patient phenotype that 1) includes STEMI and 2) excludes severe RV failure and persistent comatose state after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; (3) optimal timing of MCS deployment, as soon as possible (lower SCAI stage) and before revascularization efforts; and (4) rigorous intensive care management protocols on hemodynamic and MCS monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Failure Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"381-385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Failure Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-024-10470-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Failure Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-024-10470-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perspectives on why DanGer Shock is the first positive trial on mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.
Cardiogenic shock related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) remains a severe condition associated with a high risk of mortality despite increased availability of primary percutaneous coronary intervention and improvements in pharmacologic and device-based therapy. The results of the DanGer Shock trial stand out compared with the outcomes of the previous trials and mark the first mechanical circulatory support (MCS) strategy to show a benefit in patients with AMI-CS, a population that has always been challenging to study. Notably, negative findings from previous trials may mask positive treatment effects in specific subgroups and patient category. We systematically reviewed the design of all contemporary randomized controlled AMI-CS trials and identified four distinct features, which likely provide reasons why DanGer Shock became the first positive randomized controlled trial to support MCS in AMI-CS. DanGer Shock was the first RCT that established MCS in the context of AMI-CS. Key features were (1) patient phenotype that 1) includes STEMI and 2) excludes severe RV failure and persistent comatose state after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; (3) optimal timing of MCS deployment, as soon as possible (lower SCAI stage) and before revascularization efforts; and (4) rigorous intensive care management protocols on hemodynamic and MCS monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Heart Failure Reviews is an international journal which develops links between basic scientists and clinical investigators, creating a unique, interdisciplinary dialogue focused on heart failure, its pathogenesis and treatment. The journal accordingly publishes papers in both basic and clinical research fields. Topics covered include clinical and surgical approaches to therapy, basic pharmacology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pathology, and electrophysiology.
The reviews are comprehensive, expanding the reader''s knowledge base and awareness of current research and new findings in this rapidly growing field of cardiovascular medicine. All reviews are thoroughly peer-reviewed before publication.