{"title":"麻醉充分性(AoA)监测器与CONOX®监测器在常规全身麻醉中七氟醚用量的比较:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Rajendran Arulkumaran, Anusha Cherian, Aswini Kuberan, Prasanna Udupi Bidkar","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_174_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Adequacy of Anaesthesia (AoA) and CONOX<sup>®</sup> are combined monitors that assess levels of anaesthesia and analgesia and give a comprehensive score. No studies have measured and compared the total consumption of inhaled anaesthetic agents while using these monitors. We designed a study to compare AoA and CONOX in terms of sevoflurane usage, fentanyl usage and recovery from the effects of anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomised trial was conducted in 58 patients. Group A (<i>n</i> = 31) patients were monitored with AoA, and Group C (<i>n</i> = 27) patients were monitored with CONOX. Sevoflurane was titrated to maintain a state entropy value of 40-60 in AoA and a Quantium consciousness index (qCON) value of 40-60 in CONOX. Similarly, fentanyl was titrated with bolus doses of 0.5 μg/kg to maintain a surgical pleth index value of 40-60 in AoA and Quantium noxious index (qNOX) value of 40-60 in CONOX. Intraoperative awareness was assessed postoperatively using a modified Brice questionnaire. The <i>t</i>-test or Chi-square test was used to compare the parameters between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean sevoflurane consumption was similar between AoA and CONOX groups [13.2 (standard deviation {SD}: 3.9) (95% confidence interval {CI}:11.8, 14.5) versus 14.4 (SD: 3.7) (95% CI: 13.0, 15.7) ml/h] (<i>P</i> = 0.236). Fentanyl usage was higher in the AoA group compared to the CONOX group [146.2 (SD: 34.28) (95% CI: 134.13, 158.26) versus 128.2 (SD: 26.7) (95% CI: 118.12, 138.27) μg] (<i>P</i> = 0.031). The emergence time and haemodynamic instability events were similar between AoA and CONOX.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both AoA and CONOX measure anaesthetic depth similarly. However, interpreting qNOX values requires caution, as the patient's consciousness status influences them.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"68 11","pages":"996-1002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Adequacy of Anaesthesia (AoA) monitors with CONOX<sup>®</sup> monitor regarding sevoflurane consumption during routine general anaesthesia: A randomised clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rajendran Arulkumaran, Anusha Cherian, Aswini Kuberan, Prasanna Udupi Bidkar\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ija.ija_174_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Adequacy of Anaesthesia (AoA) and CONOX<sup>®</sup> are combined monitors that assess levels of anaesthesia and analgesia and give a comprehensive score. No studies have measured and compared the total consumption of inhaled anaesthetic agents while using these monitors. We designed a study to compare AoA and CONOX in terms of sevoflurane usage, fentanyl usage and recovery from the effects of anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomised trial was conducted in 58 patients. Group A (<i>n</i> = 31) patients were monitored with AoA, and Group C (<i>n</i> = 27) patients were monitored with CONOX. Sevoflurane was titrated to maintain a state entropy value of 40-60 in AoA and a Quantium consciousness index (qCON) value of 40-60 in CONOX. Similarly, fentanyl was titrated with bolus doses of 0.5 μg/kg to maintain a surgical pleth index value of 40-60 in AoA and Quantium noxious index (qNOX) value of 40-60 in CONOX. Intraoperative awareness was assessed postoperatively using a modified Brice questionnaire. The <i>t</i>-test or Chi-square test was used to compare the parameters between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean sevoflurane consumption was similar between AoA and CONOX groups [13.2 (standard deviation {SD}: 3.9) (95% confidence interval {CI}:11.8, 14.5) versus 14.4 (SD: 3.7) (95% CI: 13.0, 15.7) ml/h] (<i>P</i> = 0.236). Fentanyl usage was higher in the AoA group compared to the CONOX group [146.2 (SD: 34.28) (95% CI: 134.13, 158.26) versus 128.2 (SD: 26.7) (95% CI: 118.12, 138.27) μg] (<i>P</i> = 0.031). The emergence time and haemodynamic instability events were similar between AoA and CONOX.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both AoA and CONOX measure anaesthetic depth similarly. However, interpreting qNOX values requires caution, as the patient's consciousness status influences them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"68 11\",\"pages\":\"996-1002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626886/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_174_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_174_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Adequacy of Anaesthesia (AoA) monitors with CONOX® monitor regarding sevoflurane consumption during routine general anaesthesia: A randomised clinical trial.
Background and aims: Adequacy of Anaesthesia (AoA) and CONOX® are combined monitors that assess levels of anaesthesia and analgesia and give a comprehensive score. No studies have measured and compared the total consumption of inhaled anaesthetic agents while using these monitors. We designed a study to compare AoA and CONOX in terms of sevoflurane usage, fentanyl usage and recovery from the effects of anaesthesia.
Methods: A randomised trial was conducted in 58 patients. Group A (n = 31) patients were monitored with AoA, and Group C (n = 27) patients were monitored with CONOX. Sevoflurane was titrated to maintain a state entropy value of 40-60 in AoA and a Quantium consciousness index (qCON) value of 40-60 in CONOX. Similarly, fentanyl was titrated with bolus doses of 0.5 μg/kg to maintain a surgical pleth index value of 40-60 in AoA and Quantium noxious index (qNOX) value of 40-60 in CONOX. Intraoperative awareness was assessed postoperatively using a modified Brice questionnaire. The t-test or Chi-square test was used to compare the parameters between the groups.
Results: Mean sevoflurane consumption was similar between AoA and CONOX groups [13.2 (standard deviation {SD}: 3.9) (95% confidence interval {CI}:11.8, 14.5) versus 14.4 (SD: 3.7) (95% CI: 13.0, 15.7) ml/h] (P = 0.236). Fentanyl usage was higher in the AoA group compared to the CONOX group [146.2 (SD: 34.28) (95% CI: 134.13, 158.26) versus 128.2 (SD: 26.7) (95% CI: 118.12, 138.27) μg] (P = 0.031). The emergence time and haemodynamic instability events were similar between AoA and CONOX.
Conclusion: Both AoA and CONOX measure anaesthetic depth similarly. However, interpreting qNOX values requires caution, as the patient's consciousness status influences them.