包括分散的结核病分子检测在内的多成分战略对死亡率的影响:对乌干达一项集群随机试验的计划分析。

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-11-26 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102953
Achilles Katamba, Tessa Mochizuki, Talemwa Nalugwa, Mariam Nantale, Denis Oyuku, Sarah Nabwire, Diana Babirye, Johnson Musinguzi, Annet Nakawesa, Irene Nekesa, Stavia Turyahabwe, Moses Joloba, David W Dowdy, David A J Moore, J Lucian Davis, Priya Shete, Katherine Adams, Tania Reza, Katherine Fielding, Adithya Cattamanchi
{"title":"包括分散的结核病分子检测在内的多成分战略对死亡率的影响:对乌干达一项集群随机试验的计划分析。","authors":"Achilles Katamba, Tessa Mochizuki, Talemwa Nalugwa, Mariam Nantale, Denis Oyuku, Sarah Nabwire, Diana Babirye, Johnson Musinguzi, Annet Nakawesa, Irene Nekesa, Stavia Turyahabwe, Moses Joloba, David W Dowdy, David A J Moore, J Lucian Davis, Priya Shete, Katherine Adams, Tania Reza, Katherine Fielding, Adithya Cattamanchi","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is important for improving outcomes and reducing transmission. Previous studies assessing the impact of Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert), a molecular assay that provides results within 2 h, on mortality have been inconclusive. In this planned analysis of a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in Uganda, we assessed whether a multicomponent strategy, including decentralized Xpert testing, decreased mortality among adults evaluated for TB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten community health centers were randomized, using a computer-generated randomization sequence, to the XPEL-TB intervention (on-site Xpert testing plus implementation supports) and ten to routine TB care without any modifications (on-site smear microscopy and referral-based Xpert testing for selected patients). The trial included all adults ( <math><mrow><mo>≥</mo></mrow> </math> 18 years of age) undergoing evaluation for presumptive TB at each trial health center. All-cause mortality was a secondary outcome of the trial. For this analysis, the primary outcome was the mortality rate (censored at 18 months), and the secondary outcome was the six-month mortality risk. We compared the outcomes between trial arms using cluster-level analyses to account for stratified randomization and patient-level covariates. The trial was registered with the US National Institutes of Health (identifier: NCT03044158) and the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (identifier: PACTR201610001763265).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Vital status was ascertained for 8413 of 9563 (88%) XPEL-TB trial participants who presented at the health centers from October 22, 2018 through February 29, 2020. The adjusted rate ratio (aRR) was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.47-1.28), comparing the intervention (145 deaths/3655 person-years) to routine care (154 deaths/3015 person-years). In sub-group analyses, point estimates for mortality were lower in the intervention arm among people without HIV (aRR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26-0.96) and among females (aRR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.33-1.23). The mortality risk analysis yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Consistent point estimates favoring the intervention in our trial and previous ones suggest that Xpert testing may have an impact on mortality at community health centers. However, the magnitude of effect is small, and statistically significant results are unlikely to be attained within a single trial. Future trials of novel TB diagnostics at community health centers should focus on more proximal outcomes including TB detection and treatment initiation.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the US National Institutes of Health under award number R01HL130192.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"78 ","pages":"102953"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a multicomponent strategy including decentralized molecular testing for tuberculosis on mortality: planned analysis of a cluster-randomized trial in Uganda.\",\"authors\":\"Achilles Katamba, Tessa Mochizuki, Talemwa Nalugwa, Mariam Nantale, Denis Oyuku, Sarah Nabwire, Diana Babirye, Johnson Musinguzi, Annet Nakawesa, Irene Nekesa, Stavia Turyahabwe, Moses Joloba, David W Dowdy, David A J Moore, J Lucian Davis, Priya Shete, Katherine Adams, Tania Reza, Katherine Fielding, Adithya Cattamanchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is important for improving outcomes and reducing transmission. Previous studies assessing the impact of Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert), a molecular assay that provides results within 2 h, on mortality have been inconclusive. In this planned analysis of a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in Uganda, we assessed whether a multicomponent strategy, including decentralized Xpert testing, decreased mortality among adults evaluated for TB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten community health centers were randomized, using a computer-generated randomization sequence, to the XPEL-TB intervention (on-site Xpert testing plus implementation supports) and ten to routine TB care without any modifications (on-site smear microscopy and referral-based Xpert testing for selected patients). The trial included all adults ( <math><mrow><mo>≥</mo></mrow> </math> 18 years of age) undergoing evaluation for presumptive TB at each trial health center. All-cause mortality was a secondary outcome of the trial. For this analysis, the primary outcome was the mortality rate (censored at 18 months), and the secondary outcome was the six-month mortality risk. We compared the outcomes between trial arms using cluster-level analyses to account for stratified randomization and patient-level covariates. The trial was registered with the US National Institutes of Health (identifier: NCT03044158) and the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (identifier: PACTR201610001763265).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Vital status was ascertained for 8413 of 9563 (88%) XPEL-TB trial participants who presented at the health centers from October 22, 2018 through February 29, 2020. The adjusted rate ratio (aRR) was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.47-1.28), comparing the intervention (145 deaths/3655 person-years) to routine care (154 deaths/3015 person-years). In sub-group analyses, point estimates for mortality were lower in the intervention arm among people without HIV (aRR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26-0.96) and among females (aRR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.33-1.23). The mortality risk analysis yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Consistent point estimates favoring the intervention in our trial and previous ones suggest that Xpert testing may have an impact on mortality at community health centers. However, the magnitude of effect is small, and statistically significant results are unlikely to be attained within a single trial. Future trials of novel TB diagnostics at community health centers should focus on more proximal outcomes including TB detection and treatment initiation.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the US National Institutes of Health under award number R01HL130192.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"78 \",\"pages\":\"102953\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11629260/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102953\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102953","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结核病的快速诊断对于改善预后和减少传播非常重要。先前评估Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert)对死亡率影响的研究尚无定论。Xpert是一种可在2小时内提供结果的分子检测。在对乌干达一项实用的集群随机试验的计划分析中,我们评估了多组分策略,包括分散的Xpert测试,是否降低了结核病成人的死亡率。方法:使用计算机生成的随机化序列,将10个社区卫生中心随机分配到XPEL-TB干预(现场Xpert检测加实施支持)和10个常规结核病治疗(不作任何修改)(现场涂片镜检和基于转诊的Xpert检测选定患者)。该试验包括在每个试验卫生中心接受推定结核病评估的所有成年人(≥18岁)。全因死亡率是试验的次要结果。在本分析中,主要结局是死亡率(18个月时剔除),次要结局是6个月死亡风险。我们使用聚类水平分析来比较试验组之间的结果,以解释分层随机化和患者水平协变量。该试验已在美国国立卫生研究院(标识符:NCT03044158)和泛非临床试验登记处(标识符:PACTR201610001763265)注册。研究结果:2018年10月22日至2020年2月29日期间,在卫生中心就诊的9563名(88%)XPEL-TB试验参与者中,有8413人的生命状态得到了确定。干预(145例死亡/3655人-年)与常规护理(154例死亡/3015人-年)相比,调整后的死亡率比(aRR)为0.77 (95% CI: 0.47-1.28)。在亚组分析中,干预组中无HIV感染者(aRR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26-0.96)和女性(aRR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.33-1.23)的死亡率点估计值较低。死亡风险分析也得出了类似的结果。解释:在我们的试验和之前的研究中,支持干预的一致点估计表明,Xpert测试可能对社区卫生中心的死亡率有影响。然而,影响的幅度很小,统计上显著的结果不太可能在一次试验中获得。未来在社区卫生中心进行的新型结核病诊断试验应侧重于更接近的结果,包括结核病检测和开始治疗。资助:本研究由美国国立卫生研究院国家心肺血液研究所资助,资助号为R01HL130192。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of a multicomponent strategy including decentralized molecular testing for tuberculosis on mortality: planned analysis of a cluster-randomized trial in Uganda.

Background: Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is important for improving outcomes and reducing transmission. Previous studies assessing the impact of Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert), a molecular assay that provides results within 2 h, on mortality have been inconclusive. In this planned analysis of a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial in Uganda, we assessed whether a multicomponent strategy, including decentralized Xpert testing, decreased mortality among adults evaluated for TB.

Methods: Ten community health centers were randomized, using a computer-generated randomization sequence, to the XPEL-TB intervention (on-site Xpert testing plus implementation supports) and ten to routine TB care without any modifications (on-site smear microscopy and referral-based Xpert testing for selected patients). The trial included all adults ( 18 years of age) undergoing evaluation for presumptive TB at each trial health center. All-cause mortality was a secondary outcome of the trial. For this analysis, the primary outcome was the mortality rate (censored at 18 months), and the secondary outcome was the six-month mortality risk. We compared the outcomes between trial arms using cluster-level analyses to account for stratified randomization and patient-level covariates. The trial was registered with the US National Institutes of Health (identifier: NCT03044158) and the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (identifier: PACTR201610001763265).

Findings: Vital status was ascertained for 8413 of 9563 (88%) XPEL-TB trial participants who presented at the health centers from October 22, 2018 through February 29, 2020. The adjusted rate ratio (aRR) was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.47-1.28), comparing the intervention (145 deaths/3655 person-years) to routine care (154 deaths/3015 person-years). In sub-group analyses, point estimates for mortality were lower in the intervention arm among people without HIV (aRR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26-0.96) and among females (aRR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.33-1.23). The mortality risk analysis yielded similar results.

Interpretation: Consistent point estimates favoring the intervention in our trial and previous ones suggest that Xpert testing may have an impact on mortality at community health centers. However, the magnitude of effect is small, and statistically significant results are unlikely to be attained within a single trial. Future trials of novel TB diagnostics at community health centers should focus on more proximal outcomes including TB detection and treatment initiation.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the US National Institutes of Health under award number R01HL130192.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信