肺生物标志物检测对转移性非小细胞肺癌自费费用的影响。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Laila A. Gharzai , Sarah Bell , Divya M. Gupta , Ruth C. Carlos
{"title":"肺生物标志物检测对转移性非小细胞肺癌自费费用的影响。","authors":"Laila A. Gharzai ,&nbsp;Sarah Bell ,&nbsp;Divya M. Gupta ,&nbsp;Ruth C. Carlos","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.11.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Biomarker testing in metastatic non–small lung cancer (NSCLC) is critical for appropriate treatment. Claims-based datasets offer real-world information on the use and cost of biomarker testing.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We used 2013-2021 data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database. Eligible patients were adults with ≥ 2 NSCLC diagnosis codes and ≥ 2 claims of a secondary malignant neoplasm. We excluded patients with another primary or no continuous insurance coverage 12 months prior and 6 months after diagnosis. We assessed out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. Descriptive statistics were used to assess testing rates, and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to assess factors associated with testing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 4377 patients with metastatic NSCLC (mean age 60 years (SD 8.33), 49.6% female, 76.7% former smokers). Testing rates within 2 months of diagnosis increased from 58.15% in 2013 to 69.96% in 2021. On MVA, biomarker testing was associated with younger age, nonsmokers, Mountain geographic region, and point-of-service insurance plans. Biomarker testing was associated with a median OOP cost of $98 (IQR: $43.87-$306.58). Patients who underwent biomarker testing had a median total OOP cost of all services within 6 months of diagnosis of $3560.20 (IQR: $1538.37-$6199.44) compared to $1979.58 (IQR: $725.75-$4003.06) for those who did not undergo biomarker testing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Using claims data, we find that most patients with metastatic NSCLC undergo biomarker testing early in their treatment course (0-60 days), suggesting that testing is appropriately being obtained early on in their treatment course, but this testing is associated with substantially higher overall OOP costs to patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages e118-e125"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Lung Biomarker Testing on Out-Of-Pocket Costs for Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Laila A. Gharzai ,&nbsp;Sarah Bell ,&nbsp;Divya M. Gupta ,&nbsp;Ruth C. Carlos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.11.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Biomarker testing in metastatic non–small lung cancer (NSCLC) is critical for appropriate treatment. Claims-based datasets offer real-world information on the use and cost of biomarker testing.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We used 2013-2021 data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database. Eligible patients were adults with ≥ 2 NSCLC diagnosis codes and ≥ 2 claims of a secondary malignant neoplasm. We excluded patients with another primary or no continuous insurance coverage 12 months prior and 6 months after diagnosis. We assessed out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. Descriptive statistics were used to assess testing rates, and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to assess factors associated with testing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 4377 patients with metastatic NSCLC (mean age 60 years (SD 8.33), 49.6% female, 76.7% former smokers). Testing rates within 2 months of diagnosis increased from 58.15% in 2013 to 69.96% in 2021. On MVA, biomarker testing was associated with younger age, nonsmokers, Mountain geographic region, and point-of-service insurance plans. Biomarker testing was associated with a median OOP cost of $98 (IQR: $43.87-$306.58). Patients who underwent biomarker testing had a median total OOP cost of all services within 6 months of diagnosis of $3560.20 (IQR: $1538.37-$6199.44) compared to $1979.58 (IQR: $725.75-$4003.06) for those who did not undergo biomarker testing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Using claims data, we find that most patients with metastatic NSCLC undergo biomarker testing early in their treatment course (0-60 days), suggesting that testing is appropriately being obtained early on in their treatment course, but this testing is associated with substantially higher overall OOP costs to patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages e118-e125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730424002559\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525730424002559","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的生物标志物检测对于适当的治疗至关重要。基于索赔的数据集提供了关于生物标志物测试的使用和成本的真实信息。材料和方法:我们使用了Optum的去识别临床数据集市数据库中2013-2021年的数据。符合条件的患者是具有≥2个NSCLC诊断代码和≥2个继发性恶性肿瘤声明的成年人。我们排除了在诊断前12个月和诊断后6个月有其他基本保险或没有连续保险的患者。我们评估了自付(OOP)费用。使用描述性统计来评估检测率,并使用多变量分析(MVA)来评估与检测相关的因素。结果:我们确定了4377例转移性NSCLC患者(平均年龄60岁(SD 8.33), 49.6%为女性,76.7%为前吸烟者)。诊断后2个月内的检测率从2013年的58.15%上升到2021年的69.96%。在MVA中,生物标志物检测与年龄较小、不吸烟者、山地地理区域和服务点保险计划相关。生物标志物检测的中位OOP费用为98美元(IQR: 43.87- 306.58美元)。接受生物标志物检测的患者在诊断后6个月内所有服务的中位数总OOP成本为3560.20美元(IQR: 1538.37美元至6199.44美元),而未接受生物标志物检测的患者为1979.58美元(IQR: 725.75美元至4003.06美元)。结论:使用索赔数据,我们发现大多数转移性非小细胞肺癌患者在其治疗早期(0-60天)进行生物标志物检测,这表明在其治疗早期进行检测是适当的,但这种检测与患者的总体OOP成本大幅增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Lung Biomarker Testing on Out-Of-Pocket Costs for Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background

Biomarker testing in metastatic non–small lung cancer (NSCLC) is critical for appropriate treatment. Claims-based datasets offer real-world information on the use and cost of biomarker testing.

Materials and Methods

We used 2013-2021 data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database. Eligible patients were adults with ≥ 2 NSCLC diagnosis codes and ≥ 2 claims of a secondary malignant neoplasm. We excluded patients with another primary or no continuous insurance coverage 12 months prior and 6 months after diagnosis. We assessed out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. Descriptive statistics were used to assess testing rates, and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to assess factors associated with testing.

Results

We identified 4377 patients with metastatic NSCLC (mean age 60 years (SD 8.33), 49.6% female, 76.7% former smokers). Testing rates within 2 months of diagnosis increased from 58.15% in 2013 to 69.96% in 2021. On MVA, biomarker testing was associated with younger age, nonsmokers, Mountain geographic region, and point-of-service insurance plans. Biomarker testing was associated with a median OOP cost of $98 (IQR: $43.87-$306.58). Patients who underwent biomarker testing had a median total OOP cost of all services within 6 months of diagnosis of $3560.20 (IQR: $1538.37-$6199.44) compared to $1979.58 (IQR: $725.75-$4003.06) for those who did not undergo biomarker testing.

Conclusions

Using claims data, we find that most patients with metastatic NSCLC undergo biomarker testing early in their treatment course (0-60 days), suggesting that testing is appropriately being obtained early on in their treatment course, but this testing is associated with substantially higher overall OOP costs to patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信