应用甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑预防机会性感染的实体器官移植受者诺卡菌感染发生率评价。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Regina Jung, Jenny Au, Jacqueline Burnell, Adam Diamond, Ishani Shah, Christina Ruggia-Check
{"title":"应用甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑预防机会性感染的实体器官移植受者诺卡菌感染发生率评价。","authors":"Regina Jung, Jenny Au, Jacqueline Burnell, Adam Diamond, Ishani Shah, Christina Ruggia-Check","doi":"10.1177/10600280241302412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the preferred prophylactic agent for <i>Pneumocystis jiroveci</i> pneumonia (PJP) and toxoplasmosis after solid organ transplant (SOT). Compared with other agents, it has additional activity against <i>Nocardia</i> species.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of <i>Nocardia</i> infection in SOT patients receiving TMP-SMX or an alternative agent for opportunistic infection (OI) prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included transplant recipients at a large urban medical center over a period of 4 years. All patients received either TMP-SMX or an alternative agent for PJP prophylaxis. The primary outcome was the incidence of <i>Nocardia</i> infection within 24 months posttransplant. Secondary outcomes included resistance rates of <i>Nocardia</i> isolates, usage rates of alternative prophylactic agents, reasons for using alternative agents, and rate of conversion from an alternative agent back to TMP-SMX.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 791 adult SOT recipients who received PJP or toxoplasmosis prophylaxis were included. Mean age at transplantation was 60.9 years with the majority of patients being male (67.3%) lung transplant recipients (63.6%). TMP-SMX was the most commonly used initial prophylactic agent (84.6%), followed by atovaquone (15.4%). Of the 791 SOT recipients, 16 (2.0%) were diagnosed with nocardiosis within 24 months posttransplant. Patients receiving alternative agents had a higher incidence of infection compared with those receiving TMP-SMX prophylaxis (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Our findings suggest that OI prophylaxis with TMP-SMX may be protective against nocardiosis in SOT recipients. If possible, patients who are switched to an alternative agent due to TMP-SMX intolerance should be re-challenged when the adverse effect resolves. Most patients in our study were able to tolerate re-initiation, suggesting that the adverse effects associated with TMP-SMX may be temporary and may not warrant discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"10600280241302412"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Incidence of Nocardia Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients on Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole for Opportunistic Infection Prophylaxis.\",\"authors\":\"Regina Jung, Jenny Au, Jacqueline Burnell, Adam Diamond, Ishani Shah, Christina Ruggia-Check\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10600280241302412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the preferred prophylactic agent for <i>Pneumocystis jiroveci</i> pneumonia (PJP) and toxoplasmosis after solid organ transplant (SOT). Compared with other agents, it has additional activity against <i>Nocardia</i> species.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of <i>Nocardia</i> infection in SOT patients receiving TMP-SMX or an alternative agent for opportunistic infection (OI) prophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included transplant recipients at a large urban medical center over a period of 4 years. All patients received either TMP-SMX or an alternative agent for PJP prophylaxis. The primary outcome was the incidence of <i>Nocardia</i> infection within 24 months posttransplant. Secondary outcomes included resistance rates of <i>Nocardia</i> isolates, usage rates of alternative prophylactic agents, reasons for using alternative agents, and rate of conversion from an alternative agent back to TMP-SMX.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 791 adult SOT recipients who received PJP or toxoplasmosis prophylaxis were included. Mean age at transplantation was 60.9 years with the majority of patients being male (67.3%) lung transplant recipients (63.6%). TMP-SMX was the most commonly used initial prophylactic agent (84.6%), followed by atovaquone (15.4%). Of the 791 SOT recipients, 16 (2.0%) were diagnosed with nocardiosis within 24 months posttransplant. Patients receiving alternative agents had a higher incidence of infection compared with those receiving TMP-SMX prophylaxis (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Our findings suggest that OI prophylaxis with TMP-SMX may be protective against nocardiosis in SOT recipients. If possible, patients who are switched to an alternative agent due to TMP-SMX intolerance should be re-challenged when the adverse effect resolves. Most patients in our study were able to tolerate re-initiation, suggesting that the adverse effects associated with TMP-SMX may be temporary and may not warrant discontinuation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10600280241302412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241302412\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241302412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)是预防实体器官移植后肺炎(PJP)和弓形虫病(SOT)的首选药物。与其他药剂相比,它对诺卡菌有额外的活性。目的:本研究的目的是评估接受TMP-SMX或替代药物预防机会性感染(OI)的SOT患者诺卡菌感染的发生率。方法:回顾性分析包括在一个大型城市医疗中心4年以上的移植受者。所有患者均接受TMP-SMX或替代药物预防PJP。主要结果是移植后24个月内诺卡菌感染的发生率。次要结局包括诺卡菌分离株的耐药率、替代预防药物的使用率、使用替代药物的原因以及从替代药物转回TMP-SMX的比率。结果:共纳入791例接受PJP或弓形虫病预防治疗的成人SOT接受者。平均移植年龄为60.9岁,男性占67.3%,肺移植受者占63.6%。TMP-SMX是最常用的初始预防药物(84.6%),其次是阿托伐醌(15.4%)。在791例SOT受者中,16例(2.0%)在移植后24个月内被诊断为诺卡菌病。与接受TMP-SMX预防的患者相比,接受替代药物的患者感染发生率更高(P < 0.001)。结论和相关性:我们的研究结果表明,在SOT受者中,使用TMP-SMX预防OI可能对诺卡菌病有保护作用。如果可能,由于TMP-SMX不耐受而改用替代药物的患者应在不良反应消退后重新接受挑战。在我们的研究中,大多数患者能够耐受重新启动,这表明与TMP-SMX相关的不良反应可能是暂时的,可能不需要停药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Incidence of Nocardia Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients on Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole for Opportunistic Infection Prophylaxis.

Background: Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is the preferred prophylactic agent for Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) and toxoplasmosis after solid organ transplant (SOT). Compared with other agents, it has additional activity against Nocardia species.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of Nocardia infection in SOT patients receiving TMP-SMX or an alternative agent for opportunistic infection (OI) prophylaxis.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included transplant recipients at a large urban medical center over a period of 4 years. All patients received either TMP-SMX or an alternative agent for PJP prophylaxis. The primary outcome was the incidence of Nocardia infection within 24 months posttransplant. Secondary outcomes included resistance rates of Nocardia isolates, usage rates of alternative prophylactic agents, reasons for using alternative agents, and rate of conversion from an alternative agent back to TMP-SMX.

Results: A total of 791 adult SOT recipients who received PJP or toxoplasmosis prophylaxis were included. Mean age at transplantation was 60.9 years with the majority of patients being male (67.3%) lung transplant recipients (63.6%). TMP-SMX was the most commonly used initial prophylactic agent (84.6%), followed by atovaquone (15.4%). Of the 791 SOT recipients, 16 (2.0%) were diagnosed with nocardiosis within 24 months posttransplant. Patients receiving alternative agents had a higher incidence of infection compared with those receiving TMP-SMX prophylaxis (P < 0.001).

Conclusion and relevance: Our findings suggest that OI prophylaxis with TMP-SMX may be protective against nocardiosis in SOT recipients. If possible, patients who are switched to an alternative agent due to TMP-SMX intolerance should be re-challenged when the adverse effect resolves. Most patients in our study were able to tolerate re-initiation, suggesting that the adverse effects associated with TMP-SMX may be temporary and may not warrant discontinuation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Pharmacotherapy (AOP) is a peer-reviewed journal that advances pharmacotherapy throughout the world by publishing high-quality research and review articles to achieve the most desired health outcomes.The articles provide cutting-edge information about the most efficient, safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapy for the treatment and prevention of various illnesses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 14 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信