一种新型体外呼吸致敏试验及其在综合检测策略(its)中的应用。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Yubin Han, Hyeon Young Kim, Ha Ryong Kim
{"title":"一种新型体外呼吸致敏试验及其在综合检测策略(its)中的应用。","authors":"Yubin Han,&nbsp;Hyeon Young Kim,&nbsp;Ha Ryong Kim","doi":"10.1007/s00204-024-03924-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Currently, evaluating respiratory sensitization is challenging with a lack of mechanistic understanding and appropriate testing methods. Given the similarities between skin and respiratory sensitization, using defined approach (DA) in OECD Test Guideline (TG) 497 will be helpful. However, adopting skin sensitization DA is not reliable in predicting respiratory sensitization and has not been validated. To address this limitation, we developed an in vitro respiratory sensitization assay (RS assay) to assess the inflammatory responses associated with respiratory sensitization. Additionally, we investigated the applicability of direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) for respiratory sensitization testing. Combined with in silico structure–activity relationship (SAR) predictions derived from the respiratory sensitization reactive domain, respiratory sensitization integrated testing strategy (ITS) was established. RS assay showed 80% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 90% accuracy. The respiratory sensitization ITS demonstrated more higher predictive capacity for respiratory sensitization than an individual test method, with 90% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 95% accuracy when using the 20 reference chemicals. When using respiratory sensitization ITS, hazard identification and sub-categorization of potency as strong, moderate/weak, and negative were possible. As a non-animal testing approach, the respiratory sensitization ITS represents a significant milestone for regulating respiratory sensitizers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8329,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Toxicology","volume":"99 2","pages":"775 - 785"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a novel in vitro respiratory sensitization assay and its application in an integrated testing strategy (ITS)\",\"authors\":\"Yubin Han,&nbsp;Hyeon Young Kim,&nbsp;Ha Ryong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00204-024-03924-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Currently, evaluating respiratory sensitization is challenging with a lack of mechanistic understanding and appropriate testing methods. Given the similarities between skin and respiratory sensitization, using defined approach (DA) in OECD Test Guideline (TG) 497 will be helpful. However, adopting skin sensitization DA is not reliable in predicting respiratory sensitization and has not been validated. To address this limitation, we developed an in vitro respiratory sensitization assay (RS assay) to assess the inflammatory responses associated with respiratory sensitization. Additionally, we investigated the applicability of direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) for respiratory sensitization testing. Combined with in silico structure–activity relationship (SAR) predictions derived from the respiratory sensitization reactive domain, respiratory sensitization integrated testing strategy (ITS) was established. RS assay showed 80% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 90% accuracy. The respiratory sensitization ITS demonstrated more higher predictive capacity for respiratory sensitization than an individual test method, with 90% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 95% accuracy when using the 20 reference chemicals. When using respiratory sensitization ITS, hazard identification and sub-categorization of potency as strong, moderate/weak, and negative were possible. As a non-animal testing approach, the respiratory sensitization ITS represents a significant milestone for regulating respiratory sensitizers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"99 2\",\"pages\":\"775 - 785\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00204-024-03924-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00204-024-03924-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,评估呼吸致敏是具有挑战性的,缺乏机制的理解和适当的测试方法。考虑到皮肤和呼吸致敏之间的相似性,使用OECD测试指南(TG) 497中的定义方法(DA)将会有所帮助。然而,采用皮肤致敏DA预测呼吸致敏并不可靠,也没有得到验证。为了解决这一局限性,我们开发了一种体外呼吸致敏试验(RS试验)来评估与呼吸致敏相关的炎症反应。此外,我们还研究了直接肽反应性测定法(DPRA)在呼吸致敏试验中的适用性。结合基于呼吸致敏反应域的SAR预测,建立了呼吸致敏综合测试策略(ITS)。RS法灵敏度80%,特异度100%,准确度90%。在使用20种参比化学物质时,ITS对呼吸致敏反应的预测能力比单个测试方法更高,灵敏度为90%,特异性为100%,准确度为95%。当使用呼吸致敏ITS时,可以将危害识别和效力亚分类为强、中/弱和阴性。作为一种非动物试验方法,呼吸致敏ITS是调节呼吸致敏物的一个重要里程碑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a novel in vitro respiratory sensitization assay and its application in an integrated testing strategy (ITS)

Currently, evaluating respiratory sensitization is challenging with a lack of mechanistic understanding and appropriate testing methods. Given the similarities between skin and respiratory sensitization, using defined approach (DA) in OECD Test Guideline (TG) 497 will be helpful. However, adopting skin sensitization DA is not reliable in predicting respiratory sensitization and has not been validated. To address this limitation, we developed an in vitro respiratory sensitization assay (RS assay) to assess the inflammatory responses associated with respiratory sensitization. Additionally, we investigated the applicability of direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) for respiratory sensitization testing. Combined with in silico structure–activity relationship (SAR) predictions derived from the respiratory sensitization reactive domain, respiratory sensitization integrated testing strategy (ITS) was established. RS assay showed 80% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 90% accuracy. The respiratory sensitization ITS demonstrated more higher predictive capacity for respiratory sensitization than an individual test method, with 90% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 95% accuracy when using the 20 reference chemicals. When using respiratory sensitization ITS, hazard identification and sub-categorization of potency as strong, moderate/weak, and negative were possible. As a non-animal testing approach, the respiratory sensitization ITS represents a significant milestone for regulating respiratory sensitizers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Toxicology
Archives of Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Toxicology provides up-to-date information on the latest advances in toxicology. The journal places particular emphasis on studies relating to defined effects of chemicals and mechanisms of toxicity, including toxic activities at the molecular level, in humans and experimental animals. Coverage includes new insights into analysis and toxicokinetics and into forensic toxicology. Review articles of general interest to toxicologists are an additional important feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信