COVID-19机械通气患者早期死亡率sICOP评分的外部验证

IF 1.5 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mitsuaki Nishikimi, Kei Hayashida, Takashi Tagami, Shinichiro Ohshimo, Nobuaki Shime, Kazuma Yamakawa
{"title":"COVID-19机械通气患者早期死亡率sICOP评分的外部验证","authors":"Mitsuaki Nishikimi,&nbsp;Kei Hayashida,&nbsp;Takashi Tagami,&nbsp;Shinichiro Ohshimo,&nbsp;Nobuaki Shime,&nbsp;Kazuma Yamakawa","doi":"10.1002/ams2.978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to externally validate the prognostic score for mechanically ventilated patients with novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), the simplified intubated COVID-19 predictive (sICOP) score.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study conducted using the database registry of patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 at 66 hospitals in Japan. The data of 146 mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients were analyzed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The areas under the curve (AUC) of the sICOP score for predicting the 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were 0.81 (0.73–0.89) and 0.74 (0.65–0.83), respectively. The AUC of the score was statistically significantly higher than that of the SOFA score for 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality (28-day mortality; 0.82 [0.73–0.90] vs. 0.58 [0.46–0.70], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, in-hospital mortality; 0.75 [0.66–0.84] vs 0.55 [0.44–0.66], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We found that the sICOP score was useful for predicting the 28-day mortality with excellent accuracy in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in the era prior to the widespread availability of vaccines and effective antivirals. Validation of the score would be needed by using data from recent waves.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External validation of the sICOP score for early mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Mitsuaki Nishikimi,&nbsp;Kei Hayashida,&nbsp;Takashi Tagami,&nbsp;Shinichiro Ohshimo,&nbsp;Nobuaki Shime,&nbsp;Kazuma Yamakawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ams2.978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The aim of this study was to externally validate the prognostic score for mechanically ventilated patients with novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), the simplified intubated COVID-19 predictive (sICOP) score.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study conducted using the database registry of patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 at 66 hospitals in Japan. The data of 146 mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients were analyzed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The areas under the curve (AUC) of the sICOP score for predicting the 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were 0.81 (0.73–0.89) and 0.74 (0.65–0.83), respectively. The AUC of the score was statistically significantly higher than that of the SOFA score for 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality (28-day mortality; 0.82 [0.73–0.90] vs. 0.58 [0.46–0.70], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, in-hospital mortality; 0.75 [0.66–0.84] vs 0.55 [0.44–0.66], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We found that the sICOP score was useful for predicting the 28-day mortality with excellent accuracy in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in the era prior to the widespread availability of vaccines and effective antivirals. Validation of the score would be needed by using data from recent waves.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute Medicine & Surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11628425/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute Medicine & Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ams2.978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:本研究的目的是外部验证机械通气的新型冠状病毒病-2019 (COVID-19)患者预后评分,即简化的插管COVID-19预测(sICOP)评分。方法:这是一项回顾性、多中心、观察性研究,使用日本66家医院的中重度COVID-19患者数据库登记。对146例机械通气COVID-19患者的资料进行分析。结果:sICOP评分预测28天死亡率和住院死亡率的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.81(0.73 ~ 0.89)和0.74(0.65 ~ 0.83)。该评分的AUC在28天死亡率和住院死亡率方面均显著高于SOFA评分(28天死亡率;结论:我们发现在疫苗和有效抗病毒药物广泛使用之前,sICOP评分可用于预测机械通气的COVID-19患者28天死亡率,准确性很高。需要使用最近几波的数据来验证分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

External validation of the sICOP score for early mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19

External validation of the sICOP score for early mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19

Background and Objectives

The aim of this study was to externally validate the prognostic score for mechanically ventilated patients with novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), the simplified intubated COVID-19 predictive (sICOP) score.

Methods

This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study conducted using the database registry of patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 at 66 hospitals in Japan. The data of 146 mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients were analyzed.

Results

The areas under the curve (AUC) of the sICOP score for predicting the 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were 0.81 (0.73–0.89) and 0.74 (0.65–0.83), respectively. The AUC of the score was statistically significantly higher than that of the SOFA score for 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality (28-day mortality; 0.82 [0.73–0.90] vs. 0.58 [0.46–0.70], p < 0.001, in-hospital mortality; 0.75 [0.66–0.84] vs 0.55 [0.44–0.66], p < 0.001).

Conclusion

We found that the sICOP score was useful for predicting the 28-day mortality with excellent accuracy in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in the era prior to the widespread availability of vaccines and effective antivirals. Validation of the score would be needed by using data from recent waves.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acute Medicine & Surgery
Acute Medicine & Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信