体外碱性彗星试验中常用阳性对照浓度和暴露时间的优化。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Toxicology Research Pub Date : 2024-12-04 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1093/toxres/tfae195
Seda İpek Tekneci, Aylin Üstündağ, Yalçın Duydu
{"title":"体外碱性彗星试验中常用阳性对照浓度和暴露时间的优化。","authors":"Seda İpek Tekneci, Aylin Üstündağ, Yalçın Duydu","doi":"10.1093/toxres/tfae195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endogenous and exogenous factors cause DNA damage through chemical changes in the genomic DNA structure. The comet assay is a versatile, rapid, and sensitive method for evaluating DNA integrity at the individual cell level. It is used in human biomonitoring studies, the identification of DNA lesions, and the measurement of DNA repair capacity. Despite its widespread application, variations between studies remain problematic, often due to the lack of a common protocol and appropriate test controls. Using positive controls is essential to assess inter-experimental variability and ensure reliable results. Hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) is the most commonly used positive control, while potassium bromate (KBrO₃), methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), <i>N</i>-ethyl-<i>N</i>-nitrosourea (ENU), and etoposide are used less frequently. However, differences in concentrations and exposure durations prevent the confirmation of test method efficacy. This study investigates the dose-response relationship for H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, KBrO<sub>3</sub>, MMS, EMS, ENU and etoposide in the comet assay for 30 and 60-minute exposure durations in 3T3 cell lines. Accordingly recommended concentrations and exposure durations were found to be 50 μM 30 minutes (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>); 500 μM 60 min. (MMS); 10 μM 30 min. (Etoposide); 0.2 mM 30 min. and 2 mM 60 min. (EMS); 2 mM 30 min. (ENU); 500 μM 30 min. and 50 μM 60 min. (KBrO<sub>3</sub>). Our findings will contribute to reducing inter-laboratory variability by offering guidance on selecting doses and exposure durations for positive controls in the <i>in vitro</i> alkaline comet assay.</p>","PeriodicalId":105,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Research","volume":"13 6","pages":"tfae195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630343/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of concentrations and exposure durations of commonly used positive controls in the in vitro alkaline comet assay.\",\"authors\":\"Seda İpek Tekneci, Aylin Üstündağ, Yalçın Duydu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/toxres/tfae195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Endogenous and exogenous factors cause DNA damage through chemical changes in the genomic DNA structure. The comet assay is a versatile, rapid, and sensitive method for evaluating DNA integrity at the individual cell level. It is used in human biomonitoring studies, the identification of DNA lesions, and the measurement of DNA repair capacity. Despite its widespread application, variations between studies remain problematic, often due to the lack of a common protocol and appropriate test controls. Using positive controls is essential to assess inter-experimental variability and ensure reliable results. Hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) is the most commonly used positive control, while potassium bromate (KBrO₃), methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), <i>N</i>-ethyl-<i>N</i>-nitrosourea (ENU), and etoposide are used less frequently. However, differences in concentrations and exposure durations prevent the confirmation of test method efficacy. This study investigates the dose-response relationship for H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, KBrO<sub>3</sub>, MMS, EMS, ENU and etoposide in the comet assay for 30 and 60-minute exposure durations in 3T3 cell lines. Accordingly recommended concentrations and exposure durations were found to be 50 μM 30 minutes (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>); 500 μM 60 min. (MMS); 10 μM 30 min. (Etoposide); 0.2 mM 30 min. and 2 mM 60 min. (EMS); 2 mM 30 min. (ENU); 500 μM 30 min. and 50 μM 60 min. (KBrO<sub>3</sub>). Our findings will contribute to reducing inter-laboratory variability by offering guidance on selecting doses and exposure durations for positive controls in the <i>in vitro</i> alkaline comet assay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicology Research\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"tfae195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11630343/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxres/tfae195\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxres/tfae195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内源性和外源性因素通过基因组DNA结构的化学变化引起DNA损伤。彗星分析是一种多功能,快速,灵敏的方法,用于评估DNA完整性在单个细胞水平。它被用于人体生物监测研究、DNA损伤的识别和DNA修复能力的测量。尽管它的广泛应用,研究之间的差异仍然存在问题,往往是由于缺乏一个共同的协议和适当的测试控制。使用阳性对照对于评估实验间的可变性和确保可靠的结果至关重要。过氧化氢(H2O2)是最常用的阳性对照,而溴酸钾(KBrO₃)、甲磺酸甲酯(MMS)、甲磺酸乙酯(EMS)、n -乙基-n -亚硝基脲(ENU)和乙酰基乙苷的使用频率较低。然而,浓度和暴露时间的差异阻碍了测试方法有效性的确认。本研究研究了H2O2、KBrO3、MMS、EMS、ENU和依托波苷在3T3细胞系中暴露30和60分钟的剂量-反应关系。因此,建议的浓度和暴露时间为50 μM 30分钟(H2O2);500 μM 60 min (MMS);10 μM 30 min(依托泊苷);0.2 mM 30分钟和2 mM 60分钟(EMS);2mm 30min (ENU);500 μM 30 min和50 μM 60 min (KBrO3)。我们的研究结果将有助于减少实验室间的差异,为体外碱性彗星试验阳性对照选择剂量和暴露时间提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization of concentrations and exposure durations of commonly used positive controls in the in vitro alkaline comet assay.

Endogenous and exogenous factors cause DNA damage through chemical changes in the genomic DNA structure. The comet assay is a versatile, rapid, and sensitive method for evaluating DNA integrity at the individual cell level. It is used in human biomonitoring studies, the identification of DNA lesions, and the measurement of DNA repair capacity. Despite its widespread application, variations between studies remain problematic, often due to the lack of a common protocol and appropriate test controls. Using positive controls is essential to assess inter-experimental variability and ensure reliable results. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is the most commonly used positive control, while potassium bromate (KBrO₃), methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU), and etoposide are used less frequently. However, differences in concentrations and exposure durations prevent the confirmation of test method efficacy. This study investigates the dose-response relationship for H2O2, KBrO3, MMS, EMS, ENU and etoposide in the comet assay for 30 and 60-minute exposure durations in 3T3 cell lines. Accordingly recommended concentrations and exposure durations were found to be 50 μM 30 minutes (H2O2); 500 μM 60 min. (MMS); 10 μM 30 min. (Etoposide); 0.2 mM 30 min. and 2 mM 60 min. (EMS); 2 mM 30 min. (ENU); 500 μM 30 min. and 50 μM 60 min. (KBrO3). Our findings will contribute to reducing inter-laboratory variability by offering guidance on selecting doses and exposure durations for positive controls in the in vitro alkaline comet assay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicology Research
Toxicology Research TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: A multi-disciplinary journal covering the best research in both fundamental and applied aspects of toxicology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信