低剂量利妥昔单抗联合治疗慢性炎性脱髓鞘性多根神经病变的疗效和安全性。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ying Du, Qi Yan, Chuan Li, Wenping Zhu, Chao Zhao, Yunfeng Hao, Lin Li, Dan Yao, Xuan Zhou, Ying Li, Yuting Dang, Rong Zhang, Lin Han, Yuanyuan Wang, Tao Hou, Juan Li, Hailin Li, Panpan Jiang, Pei Wang, Fenying Chen, Tingge Zhu, Juntong Liu, Shuyu Liu, Lan Gao, Yingjun Zhao, Wei Zhang
{"title":"低剂量利妥昔单抗联合治疗慢性炎性脱髓鞘性多根神经病变的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Ying Du,&nbsp;Qi Yan,&nbsp;Chuan Li,&nbsp;Wenping Zhu,&nbsp;Chao Zhao,&nbsp;Yunfeng Hao,&nbsp;Lin Li,&nbsp;Dan Yao,&nbsp;Xuan Zhou,&nbsp;Ying Li,&nbsp;Yuting Dang,&nbsp;Rong Zhang,&nbsp;Lin Han,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Wang,&nbsp;Tao Hou,&nbsp;Juan Li,&nbsp;Hailin Li,&nbsp;Panpan Jiang,&nbsp;Pei Wang,&nbsp;Fenying Chen,&nbsp;Tingge Zhu,&nbsp;Juntong Liu,&nbsp;Shuyu Liu,&nbsp;Lan Gao,&nbsp;Yingjun Zhao,&nbsp;Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1002/acn3.52270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the efficacy and safety of combined low-dose rituximab with conventional therapy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Total 73 patients with CIDP were enrolled for the retrospective cohort study, and divided into conventional first-line therapy cohort (<i>n</i> = 40) and combined low-dose rituximab (100 mg per infusion) cohort (<i>n</i> = 33). The outcome measures include scores of I-RODS, mRS, INCAT, ONLS, TSS, and COMPASS 31 scale at baseline and regular four visits (4, 16, 28, and 52 weeks), as well as proportion of favorable response and outcome, corticosteroids dosage, and deterioration occurrence during follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compared to conventional therapy cohort, combined rituximab cohort presented better improvements and higher proportion of favorable response in scales assessments at each visit, as well as significantly reduced corticosteroids dosage and deterioration occurrence during the follow-up. Analyses of subgroups showed better improvements in both typical CIDP and CIDP variants in combined rituximab cohort than those in conventional therapy cohort, but had no differences between each other. Early initiating combined rituximab regimen (&lt;10 weeks) showed better improvements than delayed initiation (≥10 weeks) at the first three visits within 28 weeks, while had no difference in favorable prognoses at the last visit of 52 weeks after once reinfusion. No rituximab correlated serious adverse events were reported in our patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>Our simplified regimen of combined low-dose rituximab has been firstly demonstrated for the better efficacy and safety than conventional therapy in CIDP treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":"12 1","pages":"180-191"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of combined low-dose rituximab regimen for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy\",\"authors\":\"Ying Du,&nbsp;Qi Yan,&nbsp;Chuan Li,&nbsp;Wenping Zhu,&nbsp;Chao Zhao,&nbsp;Yunfeng Hao,&nbsp;Lin Li,&nbsp;Dan Yao,&nbsp;Xuan Zhou,&nbsp;Ying Li,&nbsp;Yuting Dang,&nbsp;Rong Zhang,&nbsp;Lin Han,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Wang,&nbsp;Tao Hou,&nbsp;Juan Li,&nbsp;Hailin Li,&nbsp;Panpan Jiang,&nbsp;Pei Wang,&nbsp;Fenying Chen,&nbsp;Tingge Zhu,&nbsp;Juntong Liu,&nbsp;Shuyu Liu,&nbsp;Lan Gao,&nbsp;Yingjun Zhao,&nbsp;Wei Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acn3.52270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To determine the efficacy and safety of combined low-dose rituximab with conventional therapy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Total 73 patients with CIDP were enrolled for the retrospective cohort study, and divided into conventional first-line therapy cohort (<i>n</i> = 40) and combined low-dose rituximab (100 mg per infusion) cohort (<i>n</i> = 33). The outcome measures include scores of I-RODS, mRS, INCAT, ONLS, TSS, and COMPASS 31 scale at baseline and regular four visits (4, 16, 28, and 52 weeks), as well as proportion of favorable response and outcome, corticosteroids dosage, and deterioration occurrence during follow-up.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Compared to conventional therapy cohort, combined rituximab cohort presented better improvements and higher proportion of favorable response in scales assessments at each visit, as well as significantly reduced corticosteroids dosage and deterioration occurrence during the follow-up. Analyses of subgroups showed better improvements in both typical CIDP and CIDP variants in combined rituximab cohort than those in conventional therapy cohort, but had no differences between each other. Early initiating combined rituximab regimen (&lt;10 weeks) showed better improvements than delayed initiation (≥10 weeks) at the first three visits within 28 weeks, while had no difference in favorable prognoses at the last visit of 52 weeks after once reinfusion. No rituximab correlated serious adverse events were reported in our patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our simplified regimen of combined low-dose rituximab has been firstly demonstrated for the better efficacy and safety than conventional therapy in CIDP treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"180-191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752089/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.52270\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.52270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨小剂量利妥昔单抗联合常规治疗慢性炎性脱髓鞘性多根神经病变(CIDP)的疗效和安全性。方法:73例CIDP患者进行回顾性队列研究,分为常规一线治疗组(n = 40)和联合小剂量利妥昔单抗(100mg /次)组(n = 33)。结果测量包括基线和常规四次随访(4,16,28和52周)时I-RODS, mRS, INCAT, ONLS, TSS和COMPASS 31评分,以及随访期间良好反应和结果的比例,皮质类固醇剂量和恶化发生率。结果:与常规治疗组相比,联合利妥昔单抗组在每次访视时的量表评估中均有更好的改善和更高的良好反应比例,且在随访期间皮质激素用量和恶化发生率均显著降低。亚组分析显示,与常规治疗组相比,联合利妥昔单抗组在典型CIDP和CIDP变异方面的改善都更好,但彼此之间没有差异。早期启动联合利妥昔单抗方案(解释:我们的简化方案联合低剂量利妥昔单抗首次在CIDP治疗中表现出比常规治疗更好的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy and safety of combined low-dose rituximab regimen for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Efficacy and safety of combined low-dose rituximab regimen for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Objective

To determine the efficacy and safety of combined low-dose rituximab with conventional therapy for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) treatment.

Methods

Total 73 patients with CIDP were enrolled for the retrospective cohort study, and divided into conventional first-line therapy cohort (n = 40) and combined low-dose rituximab (100 mg per infusion) cohort (n = 33). The outcome measures include scores of I-RODS, mRS, INCAT, ONLS, TSS, and COMPASS 31 scale at baseline and regular four visits (4, 16, 28, and 52 weeks), as well as proportion of favorable response and outcome, corticosteroids dosage, and deterioration occurrence during follow-up.

Results

Compared to conventional therapy cohort, combined rituximab cohort presented better improvements and higher proportion of favorable response in scales assessments at each visit, as well as significantly reduced corticosteroids dosage and deterioration occurrence during the follow-up. Analyses of subgroups showed better improvements in both typical CIDP and CIDP variants in combined rituximab cohort than those in conventional therapy cohort, but had no differences between each other. Early initiating combined rituximab regimen (<10 weeks) showed better improvements than delayed initiation (≥10 weeks) at the first three visits within 28 weeks, while had no difference in favorable prognoses at the last visit of 52 weeks after once reinfusion. No rituximab correlated serious adverse events were reported in our patients.

Interpretation

Our simplified regimen of combined low-dose rituximab has been firstly demonstrated for the better efficacy and safety than conventional therapy in CIDP treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信