开发一种模型,使用基于智能手机的移动测量来预测急诊科老年患者的跌倒。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Brian Suffoletto MD, MS, David Kim MD, PhD, Caitlin Toth BS, Waverly Mayer BS, Nick Ashenburg MD, Michelle Lin MD, Michael Losak MD
{"title":"开发一种模型,使用基于智能手机的移动测量来预测急诊科老年患者的跌倒。","authors":"Brian Suffoletto MD, MS,&nbsp;David Kim MD, PhD,&nbsp;Caitlin Toth BS,&nbsp;Waverly Mayer BS,&nbsp;Nick Ashenburg MD,&nbsp;Michelle Lin MD,&nbsp;Michael Losak MD","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>While emergency departments (EDs) are crucial for identifying patients at risk for falls, existing fall risk measures are often inaccurate. This study aimed to assess whether iPhone sensor-based mobility measures collected after ED discharge can improve fall prediction compared with traditional ED-based screening measures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This single-center, observational cohort study recruited ED patients aged 60 or older who owned an iPhone. Participants completed baseline assessments, downloaded a custom app to track mobility measures from the iPhone, and were followed for 90 days post-discharge. Fall outcomes were self-reported via the app or follow-up phone calls. Logistic regression and the LASSO technique were employed to identify significant predictors. The discriminative ability of the models was assessed by comparing the C-statistics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 149 participants enrolled, 76.5% (<i>N</i> = 114) provided at least 7 days of post-discharge iPhone sensor-based mobility data. The cohort had a mean age of 73 years, with 16.7% (<i>N</i> = 19) experiencing a fall. Participants who fell showed a significantly greater increase in daily steps over time compared with those who did not (<i>p</i> = 0.002). The extended logistic regression model, by incorporating mean gait asymmetry and change in step count, demonstrated a higher but nonsignificant improvement in discriminative ability (C-statistic = 0.84) compared with the base model (C-statistic = 0.79).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrates that iPhone mobility measures collected after ED discharge can enhance fall prediction relative to self-reported fall risk screening questions in older adults. The strongest mobility predictors were gait asymmetry and changes in step count. While the findings suggest that post-discharge mobility monitoring could improve fall prevention strategies, further validation in diverse populations is necessary.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 3","pages":"791-801"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a model predicting falls in older emergency department patients using smartphone-based mobility measures\",\"authors\":\"Brian Suffoletto MD, MS,&nbsp;David Kim MD, PhD,&nbsp;Caitlin Toth BS,&nbsp;Waverly Mayer BS,&nbsp;Nick Ashenburg MD,&nbsp;Michelle Lin MD,&nbsp;Michael Losak MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>While emergency departments (EDs) are crucial for identifying patients at risk for falls, existing fall risk measures are often inaccurate. This study aimed to assess whether iPhone sensor-based mobility measures collected after ED discharge can improve fall prediction compared with traditional ED-based screening measures.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This single-center, observational cohort study recruited ED patients aged 60 or older who owned an iPhone. Participants completed baseline assessments, downloaded a custom app to track mobility measures from the iPhone, and were followed for 90 days post-discharge. Fall outcomes were self-reported via the app or follow-up phone calls. Logistic regression and the LASSO technique were employed to identify significant predictors. The discriminative ability of the models was assessed by comparing the C-statistics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the 149 participants enrolled, 76.5% (<i>N</i> = 114) provided at least 7 days of post-discharge iPhone sensor-based mobility data. The cohort had a mean age of 73 years, with 16.7% (<i>N</i> = 19) experiencing a fall. Participants who fell showed a significantly greater increase in daily steps over time compared with those who did not (<i>p</i> = 0.002). The extended logistic regression model, by incorporating mean gait asymmetry and change in step count, demonstrated a higher but nonsignificant improvement in discriminative ability (C-statistic = 0.84) compared with the base model (C-statistic = 0.79).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study demonstrates that iPhone mobility measures collected after ED discharge can enhance fall prediction relative to self-reported fall risk screening questions in older adults. The strongest mobility predictors were gait asymmetry and changes in step count. While the findings suggest that post-discharge mobility monitoring could improve fall prevention strategies, further validation in diverse populations is necessary.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\"73 3\",\"pages\":\"791-801\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19303\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然急诊科(EDs)对识别有跌倒风险的患者至关重要,但现有的跌倒风险措施往往不准确。本研究旨在评估与传统ED筛查措施相比,ED放电后基于iPhone传感器的移动能力测量是否能改善跌倒预测。方法:这项单中心、观察性队列研究招募了年龄在60岁或以上、拥有iPhone的ED患者。参与者完成了基线评估,下载了一款自定义应用程序,从iPhone上跟踪活动指标,并在出院后接受了90天的随访。跌倒结果是通过应用程序或后续电话自我报告的。采用逻辑回归和LASSO技术来确定显著的预测因子。通过比较c统计量来评估模型的判别能力。结果:在纳入的149名参与者中,76.5% (N = 114)提供了出院后至少7天的基于iPhone传感器的活动数据。该队列的平均年龄为73岁,其中16.7% (N = 19)经历过跌倒。随着时间的推移,跌倒的参与者与没有跌倒的参与者相比,每天的步数明显增加(p = 0.002)。与基本模型(C-statistic = 0.79)相比,纳入平均步态不对称和步数变化的扩展逻辑回归模型(C-statistic = 0.84)显示出更高但不显著的判别能力改善(C-statistic = 0.84)。结论:本研究表明,相对于老年人自我报告的跌倒风险筛查问题,在急诊科出院后收集的iPhone移动能力测量可以增强跌倒预测。最强的活动预测因子是步态不对称和步数变化。虽然研究结果表明,出院后活动监测可以改善预防跌倒的策略,但需要在不同人群中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a model predicting falls in older emergency department patients using smartphone-based mobility measures

Objective

While emergency departments (EDs) are crucial for identifying patients at risk for falls, existing fall risk measures are often inaccurate. This study aimed to assess whether iPhone sensor-based mobility measures collected after ED discharge can improve fall prediction compared with traditional ED-based screening measures.

Methods

This single-center, observational cohort study recruited ED patients aged 60 or older who owned an iPhone. Participants completed baseline assessments, downloaded a custom app to track mobility measures from the iPhone, and were followed for 90 days post-discharge. Fall outcomes were self-reported via the app or follow-up phone calls. Logistic regression and the LASSO technique were employed to identify significant predictors. The discriminative ability of the models was assessed by comparing the C-statistics.

Results

Of the 149 participants enrolled, 76.5% (N = 114) provided at least 7 days of post-discharge iPhone sensor-based mobility data. The cohort had a mean age of 73 years, with 16.7% (N = 19) experiencing a fall. Participants who fell showed a significantly greater increase in daily steps over time compared with those who did not (p = 0.002). The extended logistic regression model, by incorporating mean gait asymmetry and change in step count, demonstrated a higher but nonsignificant improvement in discriminative ability (C-statistic = 0.84) compared with the base model (C-statistic = 0.79).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that iPhone mobility measures collected after ED discharge can enhance fall prediction relative to self-reported fall risk screening questions in older adults. The strongest mobility predictors were gait asymmetry and changes in step count. While the findings suggest that post-discharge mobility monitoring could improve fall prevention strategies, further validation in diverse populations is necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信