紫杉醇洗脱Legflow球囊导管治疗长而复杂的股腘病变的两年疗效观察。

Marc Bosiers, Koen Deloose, Giovanni Torsello, Dierk Scheinert, Jürgen Verbist, Wouter VAN DEN Eynde, Lieven Maene, Roel Beelen, Koen Keirse, Jeroen Hendriks, Joren Callaert, Michel Bosiers
{"title":"紫杉醇洗脱Legflow球囊导管治疗长而复杂的股腘病变的两年疗效观察。","authors":"Marc Bosiers, Koen Deloose, Giovanni Torsello, Dierk Scheinert, Jürgen Verbist, Wouter VAN DEN Eynde, Lieven Maene, Roel Beelen, Koen Keirse, Jeroen Hendriks, Joren Callaert, Michel Bosiers","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.24.12920-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the long-term efficacy of the paclitaxel-eluting Legflow balloon catheter in the treatment of \"real-world\" long and complex femoropopliteal lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The REFLOW study was a prospective, multi-national, non-randomized, single arm study evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of the Legflow paclitaxel-eluting balloon dilatation catheter in the treatment of stenotic or occlusive lesions >150 mm long in the femoropopliteal arteries of symptomatic patients (Rutherford 2-5). A total of 120 study subjects were enrolled in a period of 30 months, between October 2015 and May 2018. The mean age was 71.1 years and 79 patients were men (65.8%). Mean lesion length was 216.1 mm. 45.0% of the lesions were occluded, whereas 55.0% were stenotic. For this extended study follow-up, 100 out of 120 patients agreed to participate. The primary endpoint was primary patency at 24 months, defined as absence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis on duplex ultrasound (systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) at the target lesion and without TLR within 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary patency was 70.50% at 2 year. Freedom from TLR was 76.10% at 2 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Longer term follow-up confirms there is no safety-concern on this paclitaxel device. The excellent results of the newer drug-eluting devices, and the Legflow paclitaxel-eluting balloon in particular, is a valid and effective alternative to treat long and complex \"real-world\" femoropopliteal lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"509-514"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two-year outcome of the paclitaxel-eluting Legflow balloon catheter in the treatment of long and complex femoropopliteal lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Marc Bosiers, Koen Deloose, Giovanni Torsello, Dierk Scheinert, Jürgen Verbist, Wouter VAN DEN Eynde, Lieven Maene, Roel Beelen, Koen Keirse, Jeroen Hendriks, Joren Callaert, Michel Bosiers\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0021-9509.24.12920-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To investigate the long-term efficacy of the paclitaxel-eluting Legflow balloon catheter in the treatment of \\\"real-world\\\" long and complex femoropopliteal lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The REFLOW study was a prospective, multi-national, non-randomized, single arm study evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of the Legflow paclitaxel-eluting balloon dilatation catheter in the treatment of stenotic or occlusive lesions >150 mm long in the femoropopliteal arteries of symptomatic patients (Rutherford 2-5). A total of 120 study subjects were enrolled in a period of 30 months, between October 2015 and May 2018. The mean age was 71.1 years and 79 patients were men (65.8%). Mean lesion length was 216.1 mm. 45.0% of the lesions were occluded, whereas 55.0% were stenotic. For this extended study follow-up, 100 out of 120 patients agreed to participate. The primary endpoint was primary patency at 24 months, defined as absence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis on duplex ultrasound (systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) at the target lesion and without TLR within 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary patency was 70.50% at 2 year. Freedom from TLR was 76.10% at 2 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Longer term follow-up confirms there is no safety-concern on this paclitaxel device. The excellent results of the newer drug-eluting devices, and the Legflow paclitaxel-eluting balloon in particular, is a valid and effective alternative to treat long and complex \\\"real-world\\\" femoropopliteal lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"509-514\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.12920-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.12920-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:探讨紫杉醇洗脱Legflow球囊导管治疗“真实世界”长而复杂的股腘病变的长期疗效。方法:REFLOW研究是一项前瞻性,多国家,非随机,单臂研究,评估Legflow紫杉醇洗脱球囊扩张导管治疗有症状患者股腘动脉狭窄或闭塞病变> 150mm的长期安全性和有效性(Rutherford 2-5)。在2015年10月至2018年5月的30个月期间,共有120名研究对象被招募。平均年龄71.1岁,男性79例(65.8%)。平均病变长度为216.1 mm,病变闭塞占45.0%,狭窄占55.0%。在这项延长的研究随访中,120名患者中有100人同意参加。主要终点是24个月时的原发性通畅,定义为在24个月内目标病变处没有血流动力学上明显的狭窄(收缩速度比不大于2.4),并且没有TLR。结果:2年时原发性通畅率为70.50%。2年时TLR的解脱率为76.10%。结论:长期随访证实该紫杉醇装置无安全性问题。较新的药物洗脱装置,特别是Legflow紫杉醇洗脱球囊的优异效果,是治疗长而复杂的“现实世界”股腘损伤的有效替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two-year outcome of the paclitaxel-eluting Legflow balloon catheter in the treatment of long and complex femoropopliteal lesions.

Background: To investigate the long-term efficacy of the paclitaxel-eluting Legflow balloon catheter in the treatment of "real-world" long and complex femoropopliteal lesions.

Methods: The REFLOW study was a prospective, multi-national, non-randomized, single arm study evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of the Legflow paclitaxel-eluting balloon dilatation catheter in the treatment of stenotic or occlusive lesions >150 mm long in the femoropopliteal arteries of symptomatic patients (Rutherford 2-5). A total of 120 study subjects were enrolled in a period of 30 months, between October 2015 and May 2018. The mean age was 71.1 years and 79 patients were men (65.8%). Mean lesion length was 216.1 mm. 45.0% of the lesions were occluded, whereas 55.0% were stenotic. For this extended study follow-up, 100 out of 120 patients agreed to participate. The primary endpoint was primary patency at 24 months, defined as absence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis on duplex ultrasound (systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) at the target lesion and without TLR within 24 months.

Results: Primary patency was 70.50% at 2 year. Freedom from TLR was 76.10% at 2 year.

Conclusions: Longer term follow-up confirms there is no safety-concern on this paclitaxel device. The excellent results of the newer drug-eluting devices, and the Legflow paclitaxel-eluting balloon in particular, is a valid and effective alternative to treat long and complex "real-world" femoropopliteal lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信