评估实施战略完整性的概念框架。

Implementation research and practice Pub Date : 2024-12-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26334895241297278
Todd Molfenter, Lori Ducharme, Lynda Stein, Steven Belenko, Shannon Gwin Mitchell, Dennis P Watson, Matthew C Aalsma, Peter D Friedmann, Jennifer E Becan, Bryan R Garner, Jessica Vechinski, Alida Bouris, Emily Claypool, Kate Elkington
{"title":"评估实施战略完整性的概念框架。","authors":"Todd Molfenter, Lori Ducharme, Lynda Stein, Steven Belenko, Shannon Gwin Mitchell, Dennis P Watson, Matthew C Aalsma, Peter D Friedmann, Jennifer E Becan, Bryan R Garner, Jessica Vechinski, Alida Bouris, Emily Claypool, Kate Elkington","doi":"10.1177/26334895241297278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The outcomes of planned implementation efforts have been mixed, with some applications failing to achieve the desired change or impact. While reasons for mixed findings in implementation research are multifaceted (e.g., Damschroder et al., 2009, 2022), how the implementation strategy (IS) was deployed (i.e., integrity) and its impact on the implementation outcomes of evidence-based innovations (EBIs) is under-studied and warrants further clarification.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article builds on the IS fidelity and mechanisms of change literature to create the Implementation Strategy Integrity Framework (ISIF). The ISIF was developed by a set of implementation science researchers in the Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network seeking to document the role of implementation strategies in influencing EBI outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors identified four areas of documentation and measurement to examine the role of IS integrity on EBI outcomes. (a) Implementation Strategy Rigor (i.e., adherence, dose, and quality) requires those implementing the strategy/strategies to specify them, document adherence to the planned strategies, quality of execution, and any adaptations made. (b) Target User Responsiveness documents the extent and quality of targeted users' participation in IS activities and how well the target users perform their roles in conducting actions intended by the implementation strategies. (c) Target Mechanism Activation notes to what degree the implementation strategies achieved the intended impact(s) on targeted factors that facilitate EBI use. Finally, (d) these three areas are combined with selected Inner and Outer Context variables to explain IS integrity's potential moderating and mediating effects on EBI outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A framework that can define the integrity of an IS and allow for its subsequent use as an explanatory variable in EBI outcomes is necessary for better elucidating mechanisms of action. The ISIF offers a structured approach to operationalize, measure, and evaluate the application and related impacts of implementation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":73354,"journal":{"name":"Implementation research and practice","volume":"5 ","pages":"26334895241297278"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A conceptual framework for assessing implementation strategy integrity.\",\"authors\":\"Todd Molfenter, Lori Ducharme, Lynda Stein, Steven Belenko, Shannon Gwin Mitchell, Dennis P Watson, Matthew C Aalsma, Peter D Friedmann, Jennifer E Becan, Bryan R Garner, Jessica Vechinski, Alida Bouris, Emily Claypool, Kate Elkington\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26334895241297278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The outcomes of planned implementation efforts have been mixed, with some applications failing to achieve the desired change or impact. While reasons for mixed findings in implementation research are multifaceted (e.g., Damschroder et al., 2009, 2022), how the implementation strategy (IS) was deployed (i.e., integrity) and its impact on the implementation outcomes of evidence-based innovations (EBIs) is under-studied and warrants further clarification.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article builds on the IS fidelity and mechanisms of change literature to create the Implementation Strategy Integrity Framework (ISIF). The ISIF was developed by a set of implementation science researchers in the Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network seeking to document the role of implementation strategies in influencing EBI outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors identified four areas of documentation and measurement to examine the role of IS integrity on EBI outcomes. (a) Implementation Strategy Rigor (i.e., adherence, dose, and quality) requires those implementing the strategy/strategies to specify them, document adherence to the planned strategies, quality of execution, and any adaptations made. (b) Target User Responsiveness documents the extent and quality of targeted users' participation in IS activities and how well the target users perform their roles in conducting actions intended by the implementation strategies. (c) Target Mechanism Activation notes to what degree the implementation strategies achieved the intended impact(s) on targeted factors that facilitate EBI use. Finally, (d) these three areas are combined with selected Inner and Outer Context variables to explain IS integrity's potential moderating and mediating effects on EBI outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A framework that can define the integrity of an IS and allow for its subsequent use as an explanatory variable in EBI outcomes is necessary for better elucidating mechanisms of action. The ISIF offers a structured approach to operationalize, measure, and evaluate the application and related impacts of implementation strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation research and practice\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"26334895241297278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11622300/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895241297278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895241297278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:计划实施工作的结果喜忧参半,一些应用程序未能实现预期的变化或影响。虽然在实施研究中出现混合结果的原因是多方面的(例如,Damschroder等人,2009年,2022年),但实施战略(IS)是如何部署的(即完整性)及其对基于证据的创新(ebi)的实施结果的影响尚未得到充分研究,需要进一步澄清。方法:本文以IS保真度和变革机制文献为基础,创建了实施策略完整性框架(ISIF)。ISIF是由司法社区阿片创新网络的一组实施科学研究人员开发的,旨在记录实施战略在影响EBI结果方面的作用。结果:作者确定了四个文档和测量领域,以检查IS完整性对EBI结果的作用。(a)实施战略严谨性(即依从性、剂量和质量)要求实施战略/战略的人详细说明这些战略/战略,记录对计划战略的依从性、执行质量和所作的任何调整。(b)目标用户响应情况记录了目标用户参与信息系统活动的程度和质量,以及目标用户在执行战略所打算的行动中发挥作用的情况。(c)目标机制激活注意到实施战略在多大程度上实现了对促进EBI使用的目标因素的预期影响。最后,(d)将这三个领域与选定的内部和外部上下文变量相结合,以解释IS完整性对EBI结果的潜在调节和中介作用。结论:为了更好地阐明作用机制,一个能够定义IS完整性并允许其随后作为EBI结果的解释变量的框架是必要的。ISIF提供了一种结构化的方法来实施、衡量和评估实施战略的应用和相关影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A conceptual framework for assessing implementation strategy integrity.

Background: The outcomes of planned implementation efforts have been mixed, with some applications failing to achieve the desired change or impact. While reasons for mixed findings in implementation research are multifaceted (e.g., Damschroder et al., 2009, 2022), how the implementation strategy (IS) was deployed (i.e., integrity) and its impact on the implementation outcomes of evidence-based innovations (EBIs) is under-studied and warrants further clarification.

Method: This article builds on the IS fidelity and mechanisms of change literature to create the Implementation Strategy Integrity Framework (ISIF). The ISIF was developed by a set of implementation science researchers in the Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network seeking to document the role of implementation strategies in influencing EBI outcomes.

Results: The authors identified four areas of documentation and measurement to examine the role of IS integrity on EBI outcomes. (a) Implementation Strategy Rigor (i.e., adherence, dose, and quality) requires those implementing the strategy/strategies to specify them, document adherence to the planned strategies, quality of execution, and any adaptations made. (b) Target User Responsiveness documents the extent and quality of targeted users' participation in IS activities and how well the target users perform their roles in conducting actions intended by the implementation strategies. (c) Target Mechanism Activation notes to what degree the implementation strategies achieved the intended impact(s) on targeted factors that facilitate EBI use. Finally, (d) these three areas are combined with selected Inner and Outer Context variables to explain IS integrity's potential moderating and mediating effects on EBI outcomes.

Conclusions: A framework that can define the integrity of an IS and allow for its subsequent use as an explanatory variable in EBI outcomes is necessary for better elucidating mechanisms of action. The ISIF offers a structured approach to operationalize, measure, and evaluate the application and related impacts of implementation strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信