咪达唑仑与雷马唑仑在门诊泌尿生殖介入放射治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的血流动力学稳定性:1例报告。

IF 0.5 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
A&A practice Pub Date : 2024-12-10 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1213/XAA.0000000000001879
Anastasia Bui, Joanna Serafin, Suken Shah, Kara M Barnett
{"title":"咪达唑仑与雷马唑仑在门诊泌尿生殖介入放射治疗主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的血流动力学稳定性:1例报告。","authors":"Anastasia Bui, Joanna Serafin, Suken Shah, Kara M Barnett","doi":"10.1213/XAA.0000000000001879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and other significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities are vulnerable to hemodynamic instability during anesthesia. This case report compares the use of remimazolam and midazolam in a 71-year-old man with symptomatic AS, chronic kidney disease, and ischemic cardiomyopathy. The patient underwent multiple short ambulatory interventional radiology procedures. While moderate sedation with midazolam resulted in significant hypotension, use of remimazolam in subsequent procedures demonstrated a stable hemodynamic profile despite increased disease burden. This report highlights the potential advantages of remimazolam compared to midazolam in high-risk patients undergoing interventional radiology procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":56372,"journal":{"name":"A&A practice","volume":"18 12","pages":"e01879"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11636967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemodynamic Stability of Midazolam versus Remimazolam During Outpatient Genitourinary Interventional Radiology Procedures in a Patient With Aortic Stenosis: A Case Report.\",\"authors\":\"Anastasia Bui, Joanna Serafin, Suken Shah, Kara M Barnett\",\"doi\":\"10.1213/XAA.0000000000001879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and other significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities are vulnerable to hemodynamic instability during anesthesia. This case report compares the use of remimazolam and midazolam in a 71-year-old man with symptomatic AS, chronic kidney disease, and ischemic cardiomyopathy. The patient underwent multiple short ambulatory interventional radiology procedures. While moderate sedation with midazolam resulted in significant hypotension, use of remimazolam in subsequent procedures demonstrated a stable hemodynamic profile despite increased disease burden. This report highlights the potential advantages of remimazolam compared to midazolam in high-risk patients undergoing interventional radiology procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A&A practice\",\"volume\":\"18 12\",\"pages\":\"e01879\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11636967/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A&A practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000001879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A&A practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000001879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)和其他重要的心肺合并症患者在麻醉期间容易发生血流动力学不稳定。本病例报告比较了雷马唑仑和咪达唑仑在一例伴有症状性AS、慢性肾病和缺血性心肌病的71岁男性患者中的应用。患者接受了多次短期门诊介入放射检查。虽然咪达唑仑的中度镇静导致明显的低血压,但在随后的手术中使用雷马唑仑显示出稳定的血流动力学特征,尽管增加了疾病负担。本报告强调了在接受介入放射治疗的高危患者中,与咪达唑仑相比,雷马唑仑的潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hemodynamic Stability of Midazolam versus Remimazolam During Outpatient Genitourinary Interventional Radiology Procedures in a Patient With Aortic Stenosis: A Case Report.

Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and other significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities are vulnerable to hemodynamic instability during anesthesia. This case report compares the use of remimazolam and midazolam in a 71-year-old man with symptomatic AS, chronic kidney disease, and ischemic cardiomyopathy. The patient underwent multiple short ambulatory interventional radiology procedures. While moderate sedation with midazolam resulted in significant hypotension, use of remimazolam in subsequent procedures demonstrated a stable hemodynamic profile despite increased disease burden. This report highlights the potential advantages of remimazolam compared to midazolam in high-risk patients undergoing interventional radiology procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
A&A practice
A&A practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信