学龄前儿童股骨干骨折:外固定及弹性髓内钉治疗的临床应用。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Jiale Guo, Wei Feng, Baojian Song, Danjiang Zhu, Yuwei Wen, Qiang Wang
{"title":"学龄前儿童股骨干骨折:外固定及弹性髓内钉治疗的临床应用。","authors":"Jiale Guo, Wei Feng, Baojian Song, Danjiang Zhu, Yuwei Wen, Qiang Wang","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical intervention in preschoolers with femoral shaft fractures has increased due to the evolving lifestyle. This study aimed to analyze and compare the efficacy of elastic intramedullary nailing and external fixation in treating femoral shaft fractures in children aged 2-5. Ninety-nine pediatric patients were categorized into the external fixator (EF) and the elastic intramedullary nail (ESIN) group based on surgical techniques. Data on follow-up, intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, fracture features, and demographics were gathered and compared. The mean duration of follow-up was 32 months, ranging from 25 to 48 months. All fractures had healed completely and no instances of nonunion were observed. At the latest follow-up, within the EF group, there were instances of malunion, delayed union, and refracture, each occurring once. One case in every group exhibited a leg length difference above 2 cm. The external fixation group had a shorter operation duration (P = 0.04), fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy times (P < 0.01), earlier partial weight-bearing time (P < 0.01), and full weight-bearing time (P < 0.01), while a greater complication rate (29.8 vs. 14.3%, P = 0.07) compared with the ESIN group. The incidence of pin tract infection in the EF group was 21.1% (12/57) compared with 2.4% (1/42) in the ESIN group (P = 0.07). Eighty percent of the patients' families expressed concern about the residual scar after removing the EF. The ESIN group encounters fewer complications and positive aesthetic effects, making it a preferable treatment option in this specific patient population and fracture pattern. Level of evidence: Class III, retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Femoral shaft fractures in preschool children: external fixation and elastic intramedullary nail treatments in clinical practice.\",\"authors\":\"Jiale Guo, Wei Feng, Baojian Song, Danjiang Zhu, Yuwei Wen, Qiang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Surgical intervention in preschoolers with femoral shaft fractures has increased due to the evolving lifestyle. This study aimed to analyze and compare the efficacy of elastic intramedullary nailing and external fixation in treating femoral shaft fractures in children aged 2-5. Ninety-nine pediatric patients were categorized into the external fixator (EF) and the elastic intramedullary nail (ESIN) group based on surgical techniques. Data on follow-up, intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, fracture features, and demographics were gathered and compared. The mean duration of follow-up was 32 months, ranging from 25 to 48 months. All fractures had healed completely and no instances of nonunion were observed. At the latest follow-up, within the EF group, there were instances of malunion, delayed union, and refracture, each occurring once. One case in every group exhibited a leg length difference above 2 cm. The external fixation group had a shorter operation duration (P = 0.04), fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy times (P < 0.01), earlier partial weight-bearing time (P < 0.01), and full weight-bearing time (P < 0.01), while a greater complication rate (29.8 vs. 14.3%, P = 0.07) compared with the ESIN group. The incidence of pin tract infection in the EF group was 21.1% (12/57) compared with 2.4% (1/42) in the ESIN group (P = 0.07). Eighty percent of the patients' families expressed concern about the residual scar after removing the EF. The ESIN group encounters fewer complications and positive aesthetic effects, making it a preferable treatment option in this specific patient population and fracture pattern. Level of evidence: Class III, retrospective comparative study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001221\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于生活方式的改变,学龄前股骨骨干骨折的手术干预越来越多。本研究旨在分析比较弹性髓内钉与外固定治疗2-5岁儿童股骨干骨折的疗效。根据手术技术将99例患儿分为外固定架组(EF)和弹性髓内钉组(ESIN)。收集并比较随访、术中参数、术后并发症、骨折特征和人口统计学数据。随访时间25 ~ 48个月,平均32个月。所有骨折均完全愈合,未见骨不连。在最近的随访中,EF组出现了畸形愈合、延迟愈合和再骨折,每一例均发生一次。每组均有一例腿长差异超过2厘米。外固定支架组手术时间短(P = 0.04),术中透视次数少(P = 0.04)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Femoral shaft fractures in preschool children: external fixation and elastic intramedullary nail treatments in clinical practice.

Surgical intervention in preschoolers with femoral shaft fractures has increased due to the evolving lifestyle. This study aimed to analyze and compare the efficacy of elastic intramedullary nailing and external fixation in treating femoral shaft fractures in children aged 2-5. Ninety-nine pediatric patients were categorized into the external fixator (EF) and the elastic intramedullary nail (ESIN) group based on surgical techniques. Data on follow-up, intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, fracture features, and demographics were gathered and compared. The mean duration of follow-up was 32 months, ranging from 25 to 48 months. All fractures had healed completely and no instances of nonunion were observed. At the latest follow-up, within the EF group, there were instances of malunion, delayed union, and refracture, each occurring once. One case in every group exhibited a leg length difference above 2 cm. The external fixation group had a shorter operation duration (P = 0.04), fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy times (P < 0.01), earlier partial weight-bearing time (P < 0.01), and full weight-bearing time (P < 0.01), while a greater complication rate (29.8 vs. 14.3%, P = 0.07) compared with the ESIN group. The incidence of pin tract infection in the EF group was 21.1% (12/57) compared with 2.4% (1/42) in the ESIN group (P = 0.07). Eighty percent of the patients' families expressed concern about the residual scar after removing the EF. The ESIN group encounters fewer complications and positive aesthetic effects, making it a preferable treatment option in this specific patient population and fracture pattern. Level of evidence: Class III, retrospective comparative study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders. It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies). Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信