Hannah L Walsh, Kevin D Clauss, Benjamin I Meyer, Emanuil Parunakian, Cigdem Yasar, Carolina A Chiou, Thomas E Johnson, Shoaib Ugradar, Andrea L Kossler, Suzanne K Freitag, Raymond S Douglas, Sara T Wester
{"title":"Teprotumumab治疗甲状腺眼病患者的手术时机:一项多中心合作研究","authors":"Hannah L Walsh, Kevin D Clauss, Benjamin I Meyer, Emanuil Parunakian, Cigdem Yasar, Carolina A Chiou, Thomas E Johnson, Shoaib Ugradar, Andrea L Kossler, Suzanne K Freitag, Raymond S Douglas, Sara T Wester","doi":"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare regression rates, characteristics, and surgical outcomes of thyroid eye disease patients who underwent orbit, strabismus, or eyelid surgery at various times during or after teprotumumab treatment.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult patients (age >18) with a minimum of 4 infusions of teprotumumab treatment for thyroid eye disease who had had eye surgery during or after treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two groups were formed based on surgery timing: group 1 (G1) (<180 days since last infusion) and group 2 (G2) (≥180 days since last infusion).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was postoperative regression rates. Secondary outcomes were postoperative regression characteristics, regression treatment, and orbital decompression proptosis reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study evaluated 53 patients (81% female) who underwent 78 surgeries. G1 comprised 24 individuals with 34 surgeries, while G2 comprised 29 patients with 44 surgeries. Regression rates did not significantly differ between G1 and G2 (20.8% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.611). Compared with G1 patients, patients in G2 who regressed showed a significant mean increase in Clinical Activity Score (4.2 vs. 6.1, p = 0.027) and a nonsignificant yet measured increase in proptosis when compared with those in G1 (2.9 vs. 4.25, p = 0.298) at the time of regression. Compared with G1 patients, G2 patients who regressed were equally likely to undergo a repeat course of teprotumumab as group 1 (p = 0.14) but underwent a higher number of additional surgical procedures (p = 0.057). Thyroid stimulating immunoglobin levels uptrended more often in patients who regressed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that while the rate of regression may not differ significantly, the severity, clinical impact, and need for additional surgery might be more pronounced for patients who have surgery more than 6 months after their last teprotumumab dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":19588,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Timing for Patients with Thyroid Eye Disease Treated with Teprotumumab: A Collaborative Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah L Walsh, Kevin D Clauss, Benjamin I Meyer, Emanuil Parunakian, Cigdem Yasar, Carolina A Chiou, Thomas E Johnson, Shoaib Ugradar, Andrea L Kossler, Suzanne K Freitag, Raymond S Douglas, Sara T Wester\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IOP.0000000000002839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare regression rates, characteristics, and surgical outcomes of thyroid eye disease patients who underwent orbit, strabismus, or eyelid surgery at various times during or after teprotumumab treatment.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult patients (age >18) with a minimum of 4 infusions of teprotumumab treatment for thyroid eye disease who had had eye surgery during or after treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two groups were formed based on surgery timing: group 1 (G1) (<180 days since last infusion) and group 2 (G2) (≥180 days since last infusion).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was postoperative regression rates. Secondary outcomes were postoperative regression characteristics, regression treatment, and orbital decompression proptosis reduction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study evaluated 53 patients (81% female) who underwent 78 surgeries. G1 comprised 24 individuals with 34 surgeries, while G2 comprised 29 patients with 44 surgeries. Regression rates did not significantly differ between G1 and G2 (20.8% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.611). Compared with G1 patients, patients in G2 who regressed showed a significant mean increase in Clinical Activity Score (4.2 vs. 6.1, p = 0.027) and a nonsignificant yet measured increase in proptosis when compared with those in G1 (2.9 vs. 4.25, p = 0.298) at the time of regression. Compared with G1 patients, G2 patients who regressed were equally likely to undergo a repeat course of teprotumumab as group 1 (p = 0.14) but underwent a higher number of additional surgical procedures (p = 0.057). Thyroid stimulating immunoglobin levels uptrended more often in patients who regressed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study suggests that while the rate of regression may not differ significantly, the severity, clinical impact, and need for additional surgery might be more pronounced for patients who have surgery more than 6 months after their last teprotumumab dose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002839\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002839","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较甲状腺眼病患者在teprotumumab治疗期间或之后的不同时间接受眼眶、斜视或眼睑手术的消退率、特征和手术结果。设计:多中心、回顾性、观察性队列研究。参与者:接受过至少4次teprotumumab治疗的甲状腺眼病的成人患者(年龄在18岁至18岁之间),在治疗期间或治疗后接受过眼科手术。方法:根据手术时间分为两组:第一组(G1)(主要观察指标:主要观察指标为术后消退率)。次要结果是术后回归特征、回归治疗和眶减压突出复位。结果:本研究评估了53例(81%为女性)接受了78次手术。G1组24例,34例手术;G2组29例,44例手术。回归率在G1和G2之间无显著差异(20.8% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.611)。与G1患者相比,回归的G2患者临床活动评分(Clinical Activity Score)平均显著增加(4.2 vs. 6.1, p = 0.027),与G1患者相比,回归时预后无显著性增加(2.9 vs. 4.25, p = 0.298)。与G1患者相比,回归的G2患者与1组患者一样有可能接受重复的teprotumumab疗程(p = 0.14),但接受了更多的额外外科手术(p = 0.057)。甲状腺刺激免疫球蛋白水平在病情恶化的患者中更常上升。结论:我们的研究表明,虽然退化率可能没有显著差异,但对于在最后一次teprotumumab剂量后6个月以上进行手术的患者,其严重程度、临床影响和需要额外手术的情况可能更为明显。
Surgical Timing for Patients with Thyroid Eye Disease Treated with Teprotumumab: A Collaborative Multicenter Study.
Purpose: To compare regression rates, characteristics, and surgical outcomes of thyroid eye disease patients who underwent orbit, strabismus, or eyelid surgery at various times during or after teprotumumab treatment.
Participants: Adult patients (age >18) with a minimum of 4 infusions of teprotumumab treatment for thyroid eye disease who had had eye surgery during or after treatment.
Methods: Two groups were formed based on surgery timing: group 1 (G1) (<180 days since last infusion) and group 2 (G2) (≥180 days since last infusion).
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was postoperative regression rates. Secondary outcomes were postoperative regression characteristics, regression treatment, and orbital decompression proptosis reduction.
Results: This study evaluated 53 patients (81% female) who underwent 78 surgeries. G1 comprised 24 individuals with 34 surgeries, while G2 comprised 29 patients with 44 surgeries. Regression rates did not significantly differ between G1 and G2 (20.8% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.611). Compared with G1 patients, patients in G2 who regressed showed a significant mean increase in Clinical Activity Score (4.2 vs. 6.1, p = 0.027) and a nonsignificant yet measured increase in proptosis when compared with those in G1 (2.9 vs. 4.25, p = 0.298) at the time of regression. Compared with G1 patients, G2 patients who regressed were equally likely to undergo a repeat course of teprotumumab as group 1 (p = 0.14) but underwent a higher number of additional surgical procedures (p = 0.057). Thyroid stimulating immunoglobin levels uptrended more often in patients who regressed.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that while the rate of regression may not differ significantly, the severity, clinical impact, and need for additional surgery might be more pronounced for patients who have surgery more than 6 months after their last teprotumumab dose.
期刊介绍:
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery features original articles and reviews on topics such as ptosis, eyelid reconstruction, orbital diagnosis and surgery, lacrimal problems, and eyelid malposition. Update reports on diagnostic techniques, surgical equipment and instrumentation, and medical therapies are included, as well as detailed analyses of recent research findings and their clinical applications.