K MacKenzie-Shalders, J Higgs, D Cruickshank, X Tang, J Collins
{"title":"报告了澳大利亚医疗保健和老年护理服务在COVID-19发病前后的食品服务环境可持续性实践。","authors":"K MacKenzie-Shalders, J Higgs, D Cruickshank, X Tang, J Collins","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.12916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Healthcare foodservices substantially impact global environmental changes. This study investigated environmentally sustainable practices in Australian health foodservices; and perceptions of the influence of COVID-19 on foodservice environmental sustainability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study was undertaken collecting data at two time points (2019 and 2022) via a pre-workshop survey with healthcare foodservice stakeholders. The survey used rating scales and free text options to explore sustainable practices, perceived barriers and enablers to sustainable practices, and a free-text response on the impact of COVID-19. Analysis included independent samples t-tests (continuous, normally distributed), Mann-Whitney U tests (continuous non-normally distributed data), and Pearson chi-squared tests (categorical data). A qualitative analysis of free text responses to a single question about the impact of COVID-19 was used to identify, analyse, and report positive and negative aspects of COVID-19 for sustainable foodservice practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic and employment characteristics were similar between timepoints n = 37 (2019) and n = 30 (2022), except for number who had attended sustainability training (n = 14, 38.8% vs n = 19, 63.3%; p = 0.038). There were fewer private hospital (n = 6, 16.2% vs n = 0), (0%) and more rural site representation in 2022 (n = 2, 5.4% vs n = 13, 43.3%; p <0.001). Sustainable foodservice practices were consistent across timepoints (overall mean (SD) sum score for sustainable practices 63.3 (20.7) vs 61.3 (20.4); p = 0.715), with recycling cardboard (n = 27, 90.0% vs n = 22, 84.6%), and the use of reusable cutlery (n = 26, 86.7% vs n = 22, 84.6%) the most prevalent practices at both timepoints. A 'lack of equipment' was the primary reported barrier while passionate staff (\"champions\") was the primary reported enabler. Participants reported that the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increase in single-use disposable items.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study describes negligible changes in reported environmental sustainability practices by Australian healthcare foodservice stakeholders from 2019 to 2022. The study provides useful information on sustainability beliefs and practices in healthcare foodservices.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":"104-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reported foodservice environmental sustainability practices in Australian healthcare and aged care services pre and post the onset of COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"K MacKenzie-Shalders, J Higgs, D Cruickshank, X Tang, J Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1747-0080.12916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Healthcare foodservices substantially impact global environmental changes. This study investigated environmentally sustainable practices in Australian health foodservices; and perceptions of the influence of COVID-19 on foodservice environmental sustainability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study was undertaken collecting data at two time points (2019 and 2022) via a pre-workshop survey with healthcare foodservice stakeholders. The survey used rating scales and free text options to explore sustainable practices, perceived barriers and enablers to sustainable practices, and a free-text response on the impact of COVID-19. Analysis included independent samples t-tests (continuous, normally distributed), Mann-Whitney U tests (continuous non-normally distributed data), and Pearson chi-squared tests (categorical data). A qualitative analysis of free text responses to a single question about the impact of COVID-19 was used to identify, analyse, and report positive and negative aspects of COVID-19 for sustainable foodservice practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic and employment characteristics were similar between timepoints n = 37 (2019) and n = 30 (2022), except for number who had attended sustainability training (n = 14, 38.8% vs n = 19, 63.3%; p = 0.038). There were fewer private hospital (n = 6, 16.2% vs n = 0), (0%) and more rural site representation in 2022 (n = 2, 5.4% vs n = 13, 43.3%; p <0.001). Sustainable foodservice practices were consistent across timepoints (overall mean (SD) sum score for sustainable practices 63.3 (20.7) vs 61.3 (20.4); p = 0.715), with recycling cardboard (n = 27, 90.0% vs n = 22, 84.6%), and the use of reusable cutlery (n = 26, 86.7% vs n = 22, 84.6%) the most prevalent practices at both timepoints. A 'lack of equipment' was the primary reported barrier while passionate staff (\\\"champions\\\") was the primary reported enabler. Participants reported that the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increase in single-use disposable items.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study describes negligible changes in reported environmental sustainability practices by Australian healthcare foodservice stakeholders from 2019 to 2022. The study provides useful information on sustainability beliefs and practices in healthcare foodservices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition & Dietetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition & Dietetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12916\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:保健食品服务对全球环境变化产生重大影响。本研究调查了澳大利亚保健食品服务的环境可持续做法;以及对2019冠状病毒病对餐饮服务环境可持续性影响的看法。方法:通过对医疗餐饮服务利益相关者的研讨会前调查,在两个时间点(2019年和2022年)进行观察性研究。该调查使用评分量表和免费文本选项来探索可持续实践、可持续实践的感知障碍和推动因素,以及对COVID-19影响的免费文本回应。分析包括独立样本t检验(连续、正态分布)、Mann-Whitney U检验(连续、非正态分布数据)和Pearson卡方检验(分类数据)。通过对有关COVID-19影响的单一问题的免费文本回复进行定性分析,确定、分析和报告COVID-19对可持续餐饮服务实践的积极和消极影响。结果:人口统计学和就业特征在时间点n = 37(2019)和n = 30(2022)之间相似,除了参加可持续发展培训的人数(n = 14, 38.8% vs n = 19, 63.3%;p = 0.038)。2022年私立医院数量减少(n = 6, 16.2% vs n = 0),农村医院数量增加(n = 2, 5.4% vs n = 13, 43.3%);p结论:本研究描述了2019年至2022年澳大利亚医疗保健餐饮服务利益相关者报告的环境可持续性实践的可忽略不计的变化。该研究为保健食品服务的可持续性信念和实践提供了有用的信息。
Reported foodservice environmental sustainability practices in Australian healthcare and aged care services pre and post the onset of COVID-19.
Aims: Healthcare foodservices substantially impact global environmental changes. This study investigated environmentally sustainable practices in Australian health foodservices; and perceptions of the influence of COVID-19 on foodservice environmental sustainability.
Methods: An observational study was undertaken collecting data at two time points (2019 and 2022) via a pre-workshop survey with healthcare foodservice stakeholders. The survey used rating scales and free text options to explore sustainable practices, perceived barriers and enablers to sustainable practices, and a free-text response on the impact of COVID-19. Analysis included independent samples t-tests (continuous, normally distributed), Mann-Whitney U tests (continuous non-normally distributed data), and Pearson chi-squared tests (categorical data). A qualitative analysis of free text responses to a single question about the impact of COVID-19 was used to identify, analyse, and report positive and negative aspects of COVID-19 for sustainable foodservice practices.
Results: Demographic and employment characteristics were similar between timepoints n = 37 (2019) and n = 30 (2022), except for number who had attended sustainability training (n = 14, 38.8% vs n = 19, 63.3%; p = 0.038). There were fewer private hospital (n = 6, 16.2% vs n = 0), (0%) and more rural site representation in 2022 (n = 2, 5.4% vs n = 13, 43.3%; p <0.001). Sustainable foodservice practices were consistent across timepoints (overall mean (SD) sum score for sustainable practices 63.3 (20.7) vs 61.3 (20.4); p = 0.715), with recycling cardboard (n = 27, 90.0% vs n = 22, 84.6%), and the use of reusable cutlery (n = 26, 86.7% vs n = 22, 84.6%) the most prevalent practices at both timepoints. A 'lack of equipment' was the primary reported barrier while passionate staff ("champions") was the primary reported enabler. Participants reported that the COVID-19 pandemic led to an increase in single-use disposable items.
Conclusions: This study describes negligible changes in reported environmental sustainability practices by Australian healthcare foodservice stakeholders from 2019 to 2022. The study provides useful information on sustainability beliefs and practices in healthcare foodservices.
期刊介绍:
Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.