新的屎肠球菌多位点序列分型方案揭示了日本三级医疗中心耐万古霉素屎肠球菌ST1162和ST610的连续暴发。

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Microbiology spectrum Pub Date : 2025-01-07 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1128/spectrum.02131-24
Masaki Karino, Masashi Yanagihara, Tetsuya Harada, Megumi Sugo, Mizuki Karino, Hirofumi Ohtaki, Hiroyuki Hanada, Toru Takano, Masaya Yamato, Shigefumi Okamoto
{"title":"新的屎肠球菌多位点序列分型方案揭示了日本三级医疗中心耐万古霉素屎肠球菌ST1162和ST610的连续暴发。","authors":"Masaki Karino, Masashi Yanagihara, Tetsuya Harada, Megumi Sugo, Mizuki Karino, Hirofumi Ohtaki, Hiroyuki Hanada, Toru Takano, Masaya Yamato, Shigefumi Okamoto","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.02131-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> (VREfm) is a major nosocomial pathogen, and molecular epidemiological tools are crucial for controlling its spread. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is still used in clinical laboratories despite the increased accessibility of whole-genome sequencing (WGS). As PFGE equipment is no longer commercially available, clinical laboratories need alternative tools. Highly standardized multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is one option. However, the original MLST scheme for <i>E. faecium</i>, designed in 2002, showed inconsistencies with WGS-based typing. Therefore, the new Bezdíček MLST scheme, which offers more accurate genetic similarity based on genome-wide data, has recently been proposed. To clarify its clinical utility in analyzing nosocomial VREfm transmission, we compared both MLST schemes with PFGE using 68 VREfm isolates collected during an outbreak at a Japanese tertiary medical center in 2019. PFGE analysis identified nine clusters among the 68 strains, including two predominant clusters. The original scheme identified five sequence types (ST<sub>O</sub>s), of which 82.4% (56/68) were ST<sub>O</sub>192. The Bezdíček scheme identified nine sequence types (ST<sub>B</sub>s), subdividing the original ST<sub>O</sub>192 into ST<sub>B</sub>1162 (30/56), ST<sub>B</sub>610 (25/56), and ST<sub>B</sub>895 (1/56). Simpson's index of diversity values were 0.635, 0.317, and 0.648 for PFGE, the original scheme, and the Bezdíček scheme, respectively. Combining the Bezdíček scheme with admission records provided clearer outbreak visualization, indicating that two distinct ST<sub>B</sub>s independently caused sequential outbreaks. With high discriminatory power comparable with PFGE and global availability, the Bezdíček scheme is a practical and valuable tool for controlling nosocomial VREfm infections in clinical laboratories.IMPORTANCEIn areas where vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> is common, hospital-acquired infections pose a considerable threat to patients' lives owing to treatment difficulties. Although whole-genome sequencing-based typing has logically become the new reference standard and its accessibility is growing, many clinical laboratories still lack the fundamental resources to exploit its full potential. Limited availability of the traditional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis test in clinical settings has necessitated the use of alternative tools such as Bezdíček multilocus sequence typing. This study tested the clinical utility of the Bezdíček scheme by comparing it with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Designed using Czech isolates, this scheme showed comparable discriminatory powers with the traditional method for geographically distinct Japanese isolates and clearly visualized outbreaks. These findings suggest that the Bezdíček scheme is a potential alternative to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for identifying hospital transmission of vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> in clinical laboratories.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0213124"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New multilocus sequence typing scheme for <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> reveals sequential outbreaks of vancomycin-resistant <i>E. faecium</i> ST1162 and ST610 in a Japanese tertiary medical center.\",\"authors\":\"Masaki Karino, Masashi Yanagihara, Tetsuya Harada, Megumi Sugo, Mizuki Karino, Hirofumi Ohtaki, Hiroyuki Hanada, Toru Takano, Masaya Yamato, Shigefumi Okamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/spectrum.02131-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> (VREfm) is a major nosocomial pathogen, and molecular epidemiological tools are crucial for controlling its spread. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is still used in clinical laboratories despite the increased accessibility of whole-genome sequencing (WGS). As PFGE equipment is no longer commercially available, clinical laboratories need alternative tools. Highly standardized multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is one option. However, the original MLST scheme for <i>E. faecium</i>, designed in 2002, showed inconsistencies with WGS-based typing. Therefore, the new Bezdíček MLST scheme, which offers more accurate genetic similarity based on genome-wide data, has recently been proposed. To clarify its clinical utility in analyzing nosocomial VREfm transmission, we compared both MLST schemes with PFGE using 68 VREfm isolates collected during an outbreak at a Japanese tertiary medical center in 2019. PFGE analysis identified nine clusters among the 68 strains, including two predominant clusters. The original scheme identified five sequence types (ST<sub>O</sub>s), of which 82.4% (56/68) were ST<sub>O</sub>192. The Bezdíček scheme identified nine sequence types (ST<sub>B</sub>s), subdividing the original ST<sub>O</sub>192 into ST<sub>B</sub>1162 (30/56), ST<sub>B</sub>610 (25/56), and ST<sub>B</sub>895 (1/56). Simpson's index of diversity values were 0.635, 0.317, and 0.648 for PFGE, the original scheme, and the Bezdíček scheme, respectively. Combining the Bezdíček scheme with admission records provided clearer outbreak visualization, indicating that two distinct ST<sub>B</sub>s independently caused sequential outbreaks. With high discriminatory power comparable with PFGE and global availability, the Bezdíček scheme is a practical and valuable tool for controlling nosocomial VREfm infections in clinical laboratories.IMPORTANCEIn areas where vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> is common, hospital-acquired infections pose a considerable threat to patients' lives owing to treatment difficulties. Although whole-genome sequencing-based typing has logically become the new reference standard and its accessibility is growing, many clinical laboratories still lack the fundamental resources to exploit its full potential. Limited availability of the traditional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis test in clinical settings has necessitated the use of alternative tools such as Bezdíček multilocus sequence typing. This study tested the clinical utility of the Bezdíček scheme by comparing it with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Designed using Czech isolates, this scheme showed comparable discriminatory powers with the traditional method for geographically distinct Japanese isolates and clearly visualized outbreaks. These findings suggest that the Bezdíček scheme is a potential alternative to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for identifying hospital transmission of vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> in clinical laboratories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e0213124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11705941/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02131-24\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02131-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

万古霉素耐药屎肠球菌(VREfm)是一种重要的医院病原菌,分子流行病学手段是控制其传播的关键。尽管全基因组测序(WGS)越来越普及,但脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)仍在临床实验室中使用。由于PFGE设备不再商业化,临床实验室需要替代工具。高度标准化的多位点序列分型(MLST)是一种选择。然而,2002年设计的粪肠杆菌的原始MLST方案与基于wgs的分型不一致。因此,最近提出了新的Bezdíček MLST方案,该方案基于全基因组数据提供更准确的遗传相似性。为了阐明其在分析医院内VREfm传播中的临床应用,我们使用2019年日本三级医疗中心爆发期间收集的68株VREfm分离株,将MLST方案与PFGE方案进行了比较。PFGE分析共鉴定出9个聚类,其中2个优势聚类。原方案识别出5种序列类型(STOs),其中82.4%(56/68)为STO192。Bezdíček方案识别出9种stb (sequence types),将原来的STO192细分为STB1162(30/56)、STB610(25/56)和STB895(1/56)。PFGE方案、原始方案和Bezdíček方案的Simpson多样性指数分别为0.635、0.317和0.648。将Bezdíček方案与入院记录相结合,提供了更清晰的爆发可视化,表明两个不同的stb独立地导致了连续的爆发。Bezdíček方案具有与PFGE和全球可用性相当的高分辨能力,是临床实验室控制医院内VREfm感染的实用和有价值的工具。在耐万古霉素屎肠球菌常见的地区,由于治疗困难,医院获得性感染对患者的生命构成相当大的威胁。尽管基于全基因组测序的分型在逻辑上已成为新的参考标准,而且其可获得性也在不断提高,但许多临床实验室仍然缺乏充分利用其潜力的基础资源。传统的脉冲场凝胶电泳测试在临床上的可用性有限,因此有必要使用替代工具,如Bezdíček多位点序列分型。本研究通过将Bezdíček方案与脉冲场凝胶电泳进行比较来测试其临床应用。该方案采用捷克分离株设计,对地理上不同的日本分离株和清晰可视化的疫情表现出与传统方法相当的歧视性。这些发现表明Bezdíček方案是一种潜在的替代脉冲场凝胶电泳在临床实验室鉴定万古霉素耐药屎肠球菌的医院传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

New multilocus sequence typing scheme for <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> reveals sequential outbreaks of vancomycin-resistant <i>E. faecium</i> ST1162 and ST610 in a Japanese tertiary medical center.

New multilocus sequence typing scheme for <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> reveals sequential outbreaks of vancomycin-resistant <i>E. faecium</i> ST1162 and ST610 in a Japanese tertiary medical center.

New multilocus sequence typing scheme for <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> reveals sequential outbreaks of vancomycin-resistant <i>E. faecium</i> ST1162 and ST610 in a Japanese tertiary medical center.

New multilocus sequence typing scheme for Enterococcus faecium reveals sequential outbreaks of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium ST1162 and ST610 in a Japanese tertiary medical center.

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) is a major nosocomial pathogen, and molecular epidemiological tools are crucial for controlling its spread. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is still used in clinical laboratories despite the increased accessibility of whole-genome sequencing (WGS). As PFGE equipment is no longer commercially available, clinical laboratories need alternative tools. Highly standardized multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is one option. However, the original MLST scheme for E. faecium, designed in 2002, showed inconsistencies with WGS-based typing. Therefore, the new Bezdíček MLST scheme, which offers more accurate genetic similarity based on genome-wide data, has recently been proposed. To clarify its clinical utility in analyzing nosocomial VREfm transmission, we compared both MLST schemes with PFGE using 68 VREfm isolates collected during an outbreak at a Japanese tertiary medical center in 2019. PFGE analysis identified nine clusters among the 68 strains, including two predominant clusters. The original scheme identified five sequence types (STOs), of which 82.4% (56/68) were STO192. The Bezdíček scheme identified nine sequence types (STBs), subdividing the original STO192 into STB1162 (30/56), STB610 (25/56), and STB895 (1/56). Simpson's index of diversity values were 0.635, 0.317, and 0.648 for PFGE, the original scheme, and the Bezdíček scheme, respectively. Combining the Bezdíček scheme with admission records provided clearer outbreak visualization, indicating that two distinct STBs independently caused sequential outbreaks. With high discriminatory power comparable with PFGE and global availability, the Bezdíček scheme is a practical and valuable tool for controlling nosocomial VREfm infections in clinical laboratories.IMPORTANCEIn areas where vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium is common, hospital-acquired infections pose a considerable threat to patients' lives owing to treatment difficulties. Although whole-genome sequencing-based typing has logically become the new reference standard and its accessibility is growing, many clinical laboratories still lack the fundamental resources to exploit its full potential. Limited availability of the traditional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis test in clinical settings has necessitated the use of alternative tools such as Bezdíček multilocus sequence typing. This study tested the clinical utility of the Bezdíček scheme by comparing it with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Designed using Czech isolates, this scheme showed comparable discriminatory powers with the traditional method for geographically distinct Japanese isolates and clearly visualized outbreaks. These findings suggest that the Bezdíček scheme is a potential alternative to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for identifying hospital transmission of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in clinical laboratories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信