从科学计量学的角度评估厄瓜多尔硬骨鱼的科学知识。

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Carlos Robalino-Mejía, Elka García-Rada, Diego Mejía
{"title":"从科学计量学的角度评估厄瓜多尔硬骨鱼的科学知识。","authors":"Carlos Robalino-Mejía, Elka García-Rada, Diego Mejía","doi":"10.1111/jfb.16027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bony fishes play a pivotal role in Ecuador's social, economic, and ecological aspects. However, the current state of scientific knowledge on this group remains poorly understood. This study aims to assess the scientific output related to Ecuadorian bony fishes, identifying both well-researched and understudied areas. A scientometric analysis was conducted using the Scopus database, evaluating 265 peer-reviewed publications on marine and freshwater bony fishes. The results revealed that 55.5% of studies focused on marine environments, 41.9% on freshwater ecosystems, and 2.6% on mixed environments. The earliest study was published more than 130 years ago, with a marked increase in research output since 2018. Geographic and regional disparities in research efforts were evident, with the Galapagos Islands hosting the highest number of studies at the provincial level and the coastal region leading in regional publications. Additionally, there has been a notable increase in the participation of women in research over time; however, it remains significantly below parity. English was the dominant language in these publications. On average, the delay between data collection and publication was 8.43 years, which may lead to outdated or ineffective management decisions. This underscores the importance of continually updating data to ensure the accuracy of conservation status assessments. Both marine and freshwater species that were endemic have been less studied compared to non-endemic species. Most of the studied species were categorized as \"least concern,\" although a significant proportion of species classified as \"data deficient\" have started to be investigated by Ecuadorian researchers. The categories \"endangered\" and \"near threatened\" were the least studied, highlighting the urgent need for conservation initiatives targeting these vulnerable taxa. Biases in the number of studies among families, species, and geographic distribution indicate the need to expand research efforts to underrepresented taxa and regions. This analysis underscores the necessity of diversifying methodologies and broadening the research focus to more comprehensively address the challenges associated with the conservation and management of bony fishes in Ecuador.</p>","PeriodicalId":15794,"journal":{"name":"Journal of fish biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing scientific knowledge on Ecuadorian bony fishes from a scientometric perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Robalino-Mejía, Elka García-Rada, Diego Mejía\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfb.16027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bony fishes play a pivotal role in Ecuador's social, economic, and ecological aspects. However, the current state of scientific knowledge on this group remains poorly understood. This study aims to assess the scientific output related to Ecuadorian bony fishes, identifying both well-researched and understudied areas. A scientometric analysis was conducted using the Scopus database, evaluating 265 peer-reviewed publications on marine and freshwater bony fishes. The results revealed that 55.5% of studies focused on marine environments, 41.9% on freshwater ecosystems, and 2.6% on mixed environments. The earliest study was published more than 130 years ago, with a marked increase in research output since 2018. Geographic and regional disparities in research efforts were evident, with the Galapagos Islands hosting the highest number of studies at the provincial level and the coastal region leading in regional publications. Additionally, there has been a notable increase in the participation of women in research over time; however, it remains significantly below parity. English was the dominant language in these publications. On average, the delay between data collection and publication was 8.43 years, which may lead to outdated or ineffective management decisions. This underscores the importance of continually updating data to ensure the accuracy of conservation status assessments. Both marine and freshwater species that were endemic have been less studied compared to non-endemic species. Most of the studied species were categorized as \\\"least concern,\\\" although a significant proportion of species classified as \\\"data deficient\\\" have started to be investigated by Ecuadorian researchers. The categories \\\"endangered\\\" and \\\"near threatened\\\" were the least studied, highlighting the urgent need for conservation initiatives targeting these vulnerable taxa. Biases in the number of studies among families, species, and geographic distribution indicate the need to expand research efforts to underrepresented taxa and regions. This analysis underscores the necessity of diversifying methodologies and broadening the research focus to more comprehensively address the challenges associated with the conservation and management of bony fishes in Ecuador.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of fish biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of fish biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.16027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of fish biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.16027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

硬骨鱼在厄瓜多尔的社会、经济和生态方面发挥着关键作用。然而,目前对这一群体的科学知识仍然知之甚少。本研究旨在评估与厄瓜多尔硬骨鱼相关的科学产出,确定研究充分和研究不足的领域。使用Scopus数据库进行科学计量学分析,评估了265篇关于海洋和淡水硬骨鱼的同行评审出版物。结果显示,55.5%的研究集中在海洋环境,41.9%的研究集中在淡水生态系统,2.6%的研究集中在混合环境。最早的研究发表于130多年前,自2018年以来,研究成果显著增加。研究工作的地理和区域差异是明显的,加拉帕戈斯群岛在省级的研究数量最多,沿海地区在区域出版物方面处于领先地位。此外,随着时间的推移,妇女参与研究的人数显著增加;然而,它仍远低于平价。英语是这些出版物的主要语言。从数据收集到发表的平均延迟时间为8.43年,这可能导致管理决策过时或无效。这强调了不断更新数据以确保保护状况评估的准确性的重要性。与非地方性物种相比,对地方性的海洋和淡水物种的研究较少。大多数被研究的物种被归类为“最不值得关注的”,尽管厄瓜多尔研究人员已经开始调查很大一部分被归类为“数据缺乏”的物种。“濒危”和“近危”类别是研究最少的,突出了对这些脆弱分类群采取保护措施的迫切需要。在科、种和地理分布之间的研究数量偏差表明,需要将研究工作扩大到代表性不足的分类群和地区。这一分析强调有必要使方法多样化和扩大研究重点,以便更全面地解决厄瓜多尔硬骨鱼养护和管理方面的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing scientific knowledge on Ecuadorian bony fishes from a scientometric perspective.

Bony fishes play a pivotal role in Ecuador's social, economic, and ecological aspects. However, the current state of scientific knowledge on this group remains poorly understood. This study aims to assess the scientific output related to Ecuadorian bony fishes, identifying both well-researched and understudied areas. A scientometric analysis was conducted using the Scopus database, evaluating 265 peer-reviewed publications on marine and freshwater bony fishes. The results revealed that 55.5% of studies focused on marine environments, 41.9% on freshwater ecosystems, and 2.6% on mixed environments. The earliest study was published more than 130 years ago, with a marked increase in research output since 2018. Geographic and regional disparities in research efforts were evident, with the Galapagos Islands hosting the highest number of studies at the provincial level and the coastal region leading in regional publications. Additionally, there has been a notable increase in the participation of women in research over time; however, it remains significantly below parity. English was the dominant language in these publications. On average, the delay between data collection and publication was 8.43 years, which may lead to outdated or ineffective management decisions. This underscores the importance of continually updating data to ensure the accuracy of conservation status assessments. Both marine and freshwater species that were endemic have been less studied compared to non-endemic species. Most of the studied species were categorized as "least concern," although a significant proportion of species classified as "data deficient" have started to be investigated by Ecuadorian researchers. The categories "endangered" and "near threatened" were the least studied, highlighting the urgent need for conservation initiatives targeting these vulnerable taxa. Biases in the number of studies among families, species, and geographic distribution indicate the need to expand research efforts to underrepresented taxa and regions. This analysis underscores the necessity of diversifying methodologies and broadening the research focus to more comprehensively address the challenges associated with the conservation and management of bony fishes in Ecuador.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of fish biology
Journal of fish biology 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
292
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fish Biology is a leading international journal for scientists engaged in all aspects of fishes and fisheries research, both fresh water and marine. The journal publishes high-quality papers relevant to the central theme of fish biology and aims to bring together under one cover an overall picture of the research in progress and to provide international communication among researchers in many disciplines with a common interest in the biology of fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信