{"title":"Efficacy and safety of microneedling radiofrequency in acne scars.","authors":"Undavalli Navyadevi, Sadhika Ganni, Saka Satya, Subhashini Konala, Seetharam Anjaneyulu Kolalapudi, Surya Prasad Chilka, Bommareddy Anargha","doi":"10.25259/jcas_175_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To study the efficacy and safety of microneedling radiofrequency (MNRF) in the treatment of acne scars.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This is a hospital-based and prospective interventional study. A total of 44 patients (18- 55 years old), skin types III-V, with acne scars, were enrolled. Four sessions of MNRF (Lumenis legend PRO Machine, with non-insulated needle tips GEN6, GEN6L; Israel) were done with an interval of 3 weeks between each session and followed up 1 month after the last session. The outcome was assessed by Goodman and Baron's qualitative and quantitative acne scar grading, physician global assessment (PGA), and patient satisfaction score (PSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 44 patients, four patients could not complete the study. Goodman and Baron's qualitative assessment showed patients with Grades 2, 3, and 4 were 6 (15%), 17 (42.5%), and 17 (42.5%), respectively. At the end of follow-up, patients with Grades 1, 2, 4, and 4 acne scars were 5 (12.5%), 24 (60%), 10 (25%), and 1 (2.5%), respectively, which were statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Seven patients showed no improvement. Goodman and Baron's quantitative assessment showed an initial mean of 12.65 and an after-follow-up mean of 8.3, which was statistically significant <i>(P</i> < 0.05). PGA and PSS scores showed excellent to good responses of 70% and 82.5%, respectively. Adverse effects such as post-treatment erythema were seen in all patients, and edema was observed in 12 patients. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was noted in two patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MNRF was found to be effective with a better safety profile for acne scars.</p>","PeriodicalId":15415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"17 4","pages":"315-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jcas_175_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and safety of microneedling radiofrequency in acne scars.
Objectives: To study the efficacy and safety of microneedling radiofrequency (MNRF) in the treatment of acne scars.
Material and methods: This is a hospital-based and prospective interventional study. A total of 44 patients (18- 55 years old), skin types III-V, with acne scars, were enrolled. Four sessions of MNRF (Lumenis legend PRO Machine, with non-insulated needle tips GEN6, GEN6L; Israel) were done with an interval of 3 weeks between each session and followed up 1 month after the last session. The outcome was assessed by Goodman and Baron's qualitative and quantitative acne scar grading, physician global assessment (PGA), and patient satisfaction score (PSS).
Results: Out of 44 patients, four patients could not complete the study. Goodman and Baron's qualitative assessment showed patients with Grades 2, 3, and 4 were 6 (15%), 17 (42.5%), and 17 (42.5%), respectively. At the end of follow-up, patients with Grades 1, 2, 4, and 4 acne scars were 5 (12.5%), 24 (60%), 10 (25%), and 1 (2.5%), respectively, which were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Seven patients showed no improvement. Goodman and Baron's quantitative assessment showed an initial mean of 12.65 and an after-follow-up mean of 8.3, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). PGA and PSS scores showed excellent to good responses of 70% and 82.5%, respectively. Adverse effects such as post-treatment erythema were seen in all patients, and edema was observed in 12 patients. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was noted in two patients.
Conclusion: MNRF was found to be effective with a better safety profile for acne scars.
期刊介绍：
The journal will cover aspects of Dermatosurgery and Aesthetic surgery, including cutaneous surgical procedures, lasers, light based treatments and aesthetic treatments. Authors of articles addressing topics such as skin tumours, pigmentary disorders, histopathology, diagnostic techniques, drugs, applications of cosmeceuticals surgical aspects, including pre and post procedural care are highly encouraged to submit with us. The journal also publishes articles on topics in allied specialities suh as plastic surgery, maxillofacial surgery vascular surgery, oculoplastic surgery etc. that are relevant to Dermatosurgery. The journal gives preference to clinically oriented studies over experimental and animal studies. The Journal would publish peer-reviewed Original Research Articles, Systematic reviews, Narrative Reviews, Case reports, Innovations and Debates. Letters to the editor, practice points, pearls in cutaneous and aesthetic surgery, quiz page, images, novel techniques, newer uses of instruments and video presentations and ethical aspects of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery are also invited.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
