软土上土工合成筋浮桩支撑路堤的现场试验

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Rui Rui , Shi-kai He , Long-fan Peng , S.J.M. Van Eekelen , Liang-hao Li , Yu-qiu Ye
{"title":"软土上土工合成筋浮桩支撑路堤的现场试验","authors":"Rui Rui ,&nbsp;Shi-kai He ,&nbsp;Long-fan Peng ,&nbsp;S.J.M. Van Eekelen ,&nbsp;Liang-hao Li ,&nbsp;Yu-qiu Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.11.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study conducted field tests on geosynthetic-reinforced floating pile-supported embankments to evaluate the load transfer mechanism and embankment deformation during embankment construction. Vertical pressures on pile caps and subsoils between piles, geosynthetic strains, settlement of pile caps and subsoils between piles, and settlement of the embankment at different elevations were measured throughout the embankment construction. Test results showed that the maximum settlement of the pile cap was approximately 66% of subsoils between the piles. Due to the large settlement of the floating piles, the soil arching was not significantly mobilized. The geosynthetic reinforcement exhibited a maximum tensile strain of 0.2% at the end of embankment construction, indicating a mobilization of low tensioned membrane effect. The predicted equal settlement heights at adjacent piles center and the diagonal pile center were close with an average value of approximately 1.23 times the pile net spacing. The measured vertical pressures on subsoil between piles were compared with calculated results using available analytical models from the literature. The analytical models underestimated the vertical pressures on the subsoils between piles, while the modified Terzaghi's model showed better agreement with the measured results than other analytical models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55096,"journal":{"name":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","volume":"53 2","pages":"Pages 528-544"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Field test of geosynthetic-reinforced floating pile-supported embankments on soft soil\",\"authors\":\"Rui Rui ,&nbsp;Shi-kai He ,&nbsp;Long-fan Peng ,&nbsp;S.J.M. Van Eekelen ,&nbsp;Liang-hao Li ,&nbsp;Yu-qiu Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geotexmem.2024.11.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study conducted field tests on geosynthetic-reinforced floating pile-supported embankments to evaluate the load transfer mechanism and embankment deformation during embankment construction. Vertical pressures on pile caps and subsoils between piles, geosynthetic strains, settlement of pile caps and subsoils between piles, and settlement of the embankment at different elevations were measured throughout the embankment construction. Test results showed that the maximum settlement of the pile cap was approximately 66% of subsoils between the piles. Due to the large settlement of the floating piles, the soil arching was not significantly mobilized. The geosynthetic reinforcement exhibited a maximum tensile strain of 0.2% at the end of embankment construction, indicating a mobilization of low tensioned membrane effect. The predicted equal settlement heights at adjacent piles center and the diagonal pile center were close with an average value of approximately 1.23 times the pile net spacing. The measured vertical pressures on subsoil between piles were compared with calculated results using available analytical models from the literature. The analytical models underestimated the vertical pressures on the subsoils between piles, while the modified Terzaghi's model showed better agreement with the measured results than other analytical models.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"volume\":\"53 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 528-544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotextiles and Geomembranes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114424001353\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotextiles and Geomembranes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266114424001353","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对土工合成筋浮桩支撑路堤进行了现场试验,对路堤施工过程中的荷载传递机理和路堤变形进行了评价。在整个路堤施工过程中,测量了承台和桩间底土的竖向压力、土工合成应变、承台和桩间底土的沉降以及不同标高路堤的沉降。试验结果表明,承台最大沉降量约为桩间底土沉降量的66%。由于浮桩沉降较大,土拱没有受到明显的调动。土工合成钢筋在路堤施工结束时的最大拉伸应变为0.2%,表明低张力膜效应的动员。相邻桩心和对角桩心预测的等沉降高度接近,平均值约为桩网距的1.23倍。将实测的桩间底土竖向压力与文献中现有分析模型的计算结果进行了比较。分析模型低估了桩间底土的竖向压力,而改进的Terzaghi模型与实测结果吻合较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Field test of geosynthetic-reinforced floating pile-supported embankments on soft soil
This study conducted field tests on geosynthetic-reinforced floating pile-supported embankments to evaluate the load transfer mechanism and embankment deformation during embankment construction. Vertical pressures on pile caps and subsoils between piles, geosynthetic strains, settlement of pile caps and subsoils between piles, and settlement of the embankment at different elevations were measured throughout the embankment construction. Test results showed that the maximum settlement of the pile cap was approximately 66% of subsoils between the piles. Due to the large settlement of the floating piles, the soil arching was not significantly mobilized. The geosynthetic reinforcement exhibited a maximum tensile strain of 0.2% at the end of embankment construction, indicating a mobilization of low tensioned membrane effect. The predicted equal settlement heights at adjacent piles center and the diagonal pile center were close with an average value of approximately 1.23 times the pile net spacing. The measured vertical pressures on subsoil between piles were compared with calculated results using available analytical models from the literature. The analytical models underestimated the vertical pressures on the subsoils between piles, while the modified Terzaghi's model showed better agreement with the measured results than other analytical models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Geotextiles and Geomembranes 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
21.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The range of products and their applications has expanded rapidly over the last decade with geotextiles and geomembranes being specified world wide. This rapid growth is paralleled by a virtual explosion of technology. Current reference books and even manufacturers' sponsored publications tend to date very quickly and the need for a vehicle to bring together and discuss the growing body of technology now available has become evident. Geotextiles and Geomembranes fills this need and provides a forum for the dissemination of information amongst research workers, designers, users and manufacturers. By providing a growing fund of information the journal increases general awareness, prompts further research and assists in the establishment of international codes and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信