与他人和不确定性的相遇：对弗里德曼的回应

IF 1.9 2区历史学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY

Antiquity Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.15184/aqy.2024.126

Tim Flohr Sørensen

{"title":"与他人和不确定性的相遇：对弗里德曼的回应","authors":"Tim Flohr Sørensen","doi":"10.15184/aqy.2024.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I find myself largely in agreement with the argument presented in Frieman's debate article (2024) on knowing and narrativity in archaeology, and I share the author's view of feminist epistemology as key to embracing the conditions of the discipline (see e.g. Pétursdóttir & Sørensen 2023; Sørensen et al. 2024). Here, I consider some of the perspectives that Frieman leaves slightly underexplored.","PeriodicalId":8058,"journal":{"name":"Antiquity","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Encounters with otherness and uncertainty: a response to Frieman\",\"authors\":\"Tim Flohr Sørensen\",\"doi\":\"10.15184/aqy.2024.126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I find myself largely in agreement with the argument presented in Frieman's debate article (2024) on knowing and narrativity in archaeology, and I share the author's view of feminist epistemology as key to embracing the conditions of the discipline (see e.g. Pétursdóttir & Sørensen 2023; Sørensen et al. 2024). Here, I consider some of the perspectives that Frieman leaves slightly underexplored.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antiquity\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antiquity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2024.126\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2024.126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我发现自己在很大程度上同意弗里德曼关于考古学中的知识和叙事的辩论文章（2024）中提出的论点，我同意作者的观点，即女性主义认识论是接受学科条件的关键(参见Pétursdóttir &；Sørensen 2023;Sørensen et al. 2024)。在这里，我考虑了一些弗里德曼没有充分探讨的观点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Encounters with otherness and uncertainty: a response to Frieman

I find myself largely in agreement with the argument presented in Frieman's debate article (2024) on knowing and narrativity in archaeology, and I share the author's view of feminist epistemology as key to embracing the conditions of the discipline (see e.g. Pétursdóttir & Sørensen 2023; Sørensen et al. 2024). Here, I consider some of the perspectives that Frieman leaves slightly underexplored.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Antiquity Multiple-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

5.60%

发文量

149