Michaela Rippl, Pauline Grupp, Sebastian Martini, Katharina Müller, Olivia Tausendfreund, Ralf Schmidmaier, Michael Drey
{"title":"社区居住老年队列中极高骨折风险患者的特征。","authors":"Michaela Rippl, Pauline Grupp, Sebastian Martini, Katharina Müller, Olivia Tausendfreund, Ralf Schmidmaier, Michael Drey","doi":"10.1016/j.bone.2024.117366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bone anabolic treatment has been shown to be superior to oral bisphosphonates, especially in osteoporosis patients with a very high fracture-risk. The current German osteoporosis guideline classifies the very high 3-year fracture-risk based upon a novel fracture-risk model. As age is a severe risk-factor, we examined the distribution and associations to geriatric assessment parameters of the very high-risk group in a well-characterized cohort of community-dwelling geriatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses were based on 166 patients (mean age 82 ± 6 years) taken from MUSAR (MUnich SArcopenia Registry). Fracture-risk was calculated as described in the current German guideline. Thereupon, patients were allocated to the low-/moderate (<5 %), high- (5-10 %) or very high-risk group (>10 %). Associations of geriatric assessment parameters with the group allocation to the fracture-risk group were evaluated by covariate-adjusted linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>>80 % of the study population were at an increased fracture-risk. Besides, >50 % were allocated to the very high-risk group. Patients in the very high-risk group showed limitations in all physical performance tests (short physical performance battery (SPPB), gaitspeed, handgrip strength and chair rise test). Also, polypharmacy and a risk for malnutrition (from mini nutritional assessment short form (MNA-SF)), were present. All parameters showed significant associations with group allocation to very high-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the geriatric patients are at a very high-risk for osteoporotic fractures. Also, this group presented several limitations in the comprehensive geriatric assessment highlighting the vulnerability of this group. Clinicians need to reinforce fracture-risk assessment and familiarize with treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":93913,"journal":{"name":"Bone","volume":" ","pages":"117366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of patients with very high fracture risk in a community-dwelling geriatric cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Michaela Rippl, Pauline Grupp, Sebastian Martini, Katharina Müller, Olivia Tausendfreund, Ralf Schmidmaier, Michael Drey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bone.2024.117366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bone anabolic treatment has been shown to be superior to oral bisphosphonates, especially in osteoporosis patients with a very high fracture-risk. The current German osteoporosis guideline classifies the very high 3-year fracture-risk based upon a novel fracture-risk model. As age is a severe risk-factor, we examined the distribution and associations to geriatric assessment parameters of the very high-risk group in a well-characterized cohort of community-dwelling geriatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analyses were based on 166 patients (mean age 82 ± 6 years) taken from MUSAR (MUnich SArcopenia Registry). Fracture-risk was calculated as described in the current German guideline. Thereupon, patients were allocated to the low-/moderate (<5 %), high- (5-10 %) or very high-risk group (>10 %). Associations of geriatric assessment parameters with the group allocation to the fracture-risk group were evaluated by covariate-adjusted linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>>80 % of the study population were at an increased fracture-risk. Besides, >50 % were allocated to the very high-risk group. Patients in the very high-risk group showed limitations in all physical performance tests (short physical performance battery (SPPB), gaitspeed, handgrip strength and chair rise test). Also, polypharmacy and a risk for malnutrition (from mini nutritional assessment short form (MNA-SF)), were present. All parameters showed significant associations with group allocation to very high-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the geriatric patients are at a very high-risk for osteoporotic fractures. Also, this group presented several limitations in the comprehensive geriatric assessment highlighting the vulnerability of this group. Clinicians need to reinforce fracture-risk assessment and familiarize with treatment options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"117366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2024.117366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2024.117366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Characteristics of patients with very high fracture risk in a community-dwelling geriatric cohort.
Objective: Bone anabolic treatment has been shown to be superior to oral bisphosphonates, especially in osteoporosis patients with a very high fracture-risk. The current German osteoporosis guideline classifies the very high 3-year fracture-risk based upon a novel fracture-risk model. As age is a severe risk-factor, we examined the distribution and associations to geriatric assessment parameters of the very high-risk group in a well-characterized cohort of community-dwelling geriatric patients.
Methods: Analyses were based on 166 patients (mean age 82 ± 6 years) taken from MUSAR (MUnich SArcopenia Registry). Fracture-risk was calculated as described in the current German guideline. Thereupon, patients were allocated to the low-/moderate (<5 %), high- (5-10 %) or very high-risk group (>10 %). Associations of geriatric assessment parameters with the group allocation to the fracture-risk group were evaluated by covariate-adjusted linear regression analysis.
Results: >80 % of the study population were at an increased fracture-risk. Besides, >50 % were allocated to the very high-risk group. Patients in the very high-risk group showed limitations in all physical performance tests (short physical performance battery (SPPB), gaitspeed, handgrip strength and chair rise test). Also, polypharmacy and a risk for malnutrition (from mini nutritional assessment short form (MNA-SF)), were present. All parameters showed significant associations with group allocation to very high-risk group.
Conclusion: Most of the geriatric patients are at a very high-risk for osteoporotic fractures. Also, this group presented several limitations in the comprehensive geriatric assessment highlighting the vulnerability of this group. Clinicians need to reinforce fracture-risk assessment and familiarize with treatment options.