David Z Rose, Lili Zhou, Karlon H Johnson, Charles Schutt, Daniel M Reyes de Jesus, Hannah Gardener, Carolina M Gutierrez, Dianne Foster, Angus Jameson, Sebastian Koch, Hao Ying, Ayham Alkhachroum, Jose G Romano, Tatjana Rundek, Negar Asdaghi
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间，佛罗里达州中风登记处的中风元指标 \"无缺陷护理 \"逐年保持不变。","authors":"David Z Rose, Lili Zhou, Karlon H Johnson, Charles Schutt, Daniel M Reyes de Jesus, Hannah Gardener, Carolina M Gutierrez, Dianne Foster, Angus Jameson, Sebastian Koch, Hao Ying, Ayham Alkhachroum, Jose G Romano, Tatjana Rundek, Negar Asdaghi","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resource allocation for stroke care was impacted worldwide by the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID19) pandemic. Regionally, worsened stroke outcomes varied, however comparative year-over-year in-hospital performance metrics from the pandemic are unreported. Therefore, within the large Florida Stroke Registry (FSR), we assessed the pandemic's effects upon the American Heart Association (AHA) Get With The Guidelines (GWTG) ischemic stroke metrics and the meta-metric, Defect-Free Care (DFC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From March 2017 to February 2021, FSR collected 146,593 patients with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke or TIA (31,940 between 2017-2018; 35,086 between 2018-2019; 39,722 between 2019-2020; 39,845 between 2020-2021). FSR evaluated DFC, intravenous thrombolytic (IVT) use, endovascular therapy (EVT) use, and Door-To-Needle (DTN), Door-To-Computed Tomography (DTCT), and Door-To-Puncture (DTP) times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-pandemic versus pandemic stroke patients' demographics were similar (49.0 % vs. 48.6 % female, age 70.7±14.3 vs. 70.5±14.1 years, 64.0 % vs. 65.3 % white, 18.6 % vs. 18.8 % black, 17.4 % vs. 16.0 % Hispanic). Pandemic strokes, versus the immediate year pre-pandemic, were significantly more severe (median NIHSS 4 [IQR 8] vs. 3 [7]), utilized emergency medical services more (59.2 % vs. 57.6 %) and were more likely to receive EVT (8.0 % vs. 7.0 %). IVT use, and DTCT and DTP times were unchanged. The meta-metric DFC improved year-over-year, albeit slower during the pandemic [2017/18-2018/19: 70.7 % to 74.9 % (+4.2 %); 2018/19-2019/20: 74.9 % to 82.1 % (+7.2 %); 2019/20-2020/21: 82.1 % to 85.2 % (+3.1 %)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite pandemic challenges, the stroke meta-metric DFC improved, albeit more slowly than pre-pandemic years. In this large statewide registry, pandemic patients received EVT more, potentially due to more severe stroke presentations. Stroke care infrastructure preparedness for future pandemics is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"108179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The stroke meta-metric, Defect-Free Care, was maintained year-over-year within the Florida stroke registry during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"David Z Rose, Lili Zhou, Karlon H Johnson, Charles Schutt, Daniel M Reyes de Jesus, Hannah Gardener, Carolina M Gutierrez, Dianne Foster, Angus Jameson, Sebastian Koch, Hao Ying, Ayham Alkhachroum, Jose G Romano, Tatjana Rundek, Negar Asdaghi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resource allocation for stroke care was impacted worldwide by the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID19) pandemic. Regionally, worsened stroke outcomes varied, however comparative year-over-year in-hospital performance metrics from the pandemic are unreported. Therefore, within the large Florida Stroke Registry (FSR), we assessed the pandemic's effects upon the American Heart Association (AHA) Get With The Guidelines (GWTG) ischemic stroke metrics and the meta-metric, Defect-Free Care (DFC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From March 2017 to February 2021, FSR collected 146,593 patients with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke or TIA (31,940 between 2017-2018; 35,086 between 2018-2019; 39,722 between 2019-2020; 39,845 between 2020-2021). FSR evaluated DFC, intravenous thrombolytic (IVT) use, endovascular therapy (EVT) use, and Door-To-Needle (DTN), Door-To-Computed Tomography (DTCT), and Door-To-Puncture (DTP) times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-pandemic versus pandemic stroke patients' demographics were similar (49.0 % vs. 48.6 % female, age 70.7±14.3 vs. 70.5±14.1 years, 64.0 % vs. 65.3 % white, 18.6 % vs. 18.8 % black, 17.4 % vs. 16.0 % Hispanic). Pandemic strokes, versus the immediate year pre-pandemic, were significantly more severe (median NIHSS 4 [IQR 8] vs. 3 [7]), utilized emergency medical services more (59.2 % vs. 57.6 %) and were more likely to receive EVT (8.0 % vs. 7.0 %). IVT use, and DTCT and DTP times were unchanged. The meta-metric DFC improved year-over-year, albeit slower during the pandemic [2017/18-2018/19: 70.7 % to 74.9 % (+4.2 %); 2018/19-2019/20: 74.9 % to 82.1 % (+7.2 %); 2019/20-2020/21: 82.1 % to 85.2 % (+3.1 %)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite pandemic challenges, the stroke meta-metric DFC improved, albeit more slowly than pre-pandemic years. In this large statewide registry, pandemic patients received EVT more, potentially due to more severe stroke presentations. Stroke care infrastructure preparedness for future pandemics is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"108179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108179\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The stroke meta-metric, Defect-Free Care, was maintained year-over-year within the Florida stroke registry during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Background: Resource allocation for stroke care was impacted worldwide by the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID19) pandemic. Regionally, worsened stroke outcomes varied, however comparative year-over-year in-hospital performance metrics from the pandemic are unreported. Therefore, within the large Florida Stroke Registry (FSR), we assessed the pandemic's effects upon the American Heart Association (AHA) Get With The Guidelines (GWTG) ischemic stroke metrics and the meta-metric, Defect-Free Care (DFC).
Methods: From March 2017 to February 2021, FSR collected 146,593 patients with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke or TIA (31,940 between 2017-2018; 35,086 between 2018-2019; 39,722 between 2019-2020; 39,845 between 2020-2021). FSR evaluated DFC, intravenous thrombolytic (IVT) use, endovascular therapy (EVT) use, and Door-To-Needle (DTN), Door-To-Computed Tomography (DTCT), and Door-To-Puncture (DTP) times.
Results: Pre-pandemic versus pandemic stroke patients' demographics were similar (49.0 % vs. 48.6 % female, age 70.7±14.3 vs. 70.5±14.1 years, 64.0 % vs. 65.3 % white, 18.6 % vs. 18.8 % black, 17.4 % vs. 16.0 % Hispanic). Pandemic strokes, versus the immediate year pre-pandemic, were significantly more severe (median NIHSS 4 [IQR 8] vs. 3 [7]), utilized emergency medical services more (59.2 % vs. 57.6 %) and were more likely to receive EVT (8.0 % vs. 7.0 %). IVT use, and DTCT and DTP times were unchanged. The meta-metric DFC improved year-over-year, albeit slower during the pandemic [2017/18-2018/19: 70.7 % to 74.9 % (+4.2 %); 2018/19-2019/20: 74.9 % to 82.1 % (+7.2 %); 2019/20-2020/21: 82.1 % to 85.2 % (+3.1 %)].
Conclusions: Despite pandemic challenges, the stroke meta-metric DFC improved, albeit more slowly than pre-pandemic years. In this large statewide registry, pandemic patients received EVT more, potentially due to more severe stroke presentations. Stroke care infrastructure preparedness for future pandemics is warranted.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
