评估协作治理的效果:以数字教育项目为例。

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Stéphane Bonny, Tereza Cahlikova
{"title":"评估协作治理的效果:以数字教育项目为例。","authors":"Stéphane Bonny,&nbsp;Tereza Cahlikova","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The introduction of digital curricula has become topical due to the increasingly pervasive role of ICTs in the society implying the necessity to develop digital skills from a young age. Because of the lack of in-house know-how, governments often need to rely on external actors providing digital education expertise. Organisational structures of such programs thus resemble collaborative governance regimes with distinct roles attributed to specific stakeholders. In this study, we explore cross-sector collaboration structures of the DigEd project aiming to introduce digital education in different cycles of compulsory and post-compulsory schooling on the local level in Switzerland. Findings indicate that the lack of leadership and of clarification of each partner’s role during the pilot phase of the project did not allow for the creation of a shared understanding among the involved partners and led to the domination of a limited number of influential actors. This tendency is confirmed through a graphic SNA analysis clearly illustrating the centrality of non-state actors. This contribution shows that it is not only the effects of projects that should be of interest to evaluators, but also their internal collaboration structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 102522"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the effects of collaborative governance: Case of a digital education project\",\"authors\":\"Stéphane Bonny,&nbsp;Tereza Cahlikova\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The introduction of digital curricula has become topical due to the increasingly pervasive role of ICTs in the society implying the necessity to develop digital skills from a young age. Because of the lack of in-house know-how, governments often need to rely on external actors providing digital education expertise. Organisational structures of such programs thus resemble collaborative governance regimes with distinct roles attributed to specific stakeholders. In this study, we explore cross-sector collaboration structures of the DigEd project aiming to introduce digital education in different cycles of compulsory and post-compulsory schooling on the local level in Switzerland. Findings indicate that the lack of leadership and of clarification of each partner’s role during the pilot phase of the project did not allow for the creation of a shared understanding among the involved partners and led to the domination of a limited number of influential actors. This tendency is confirmed through a graphic SNA analysis clearly illustrating the centrality of non-state actors. This contribution shows that it is not only the effects of projects that should be of interest to evaluators, but also their internal collaboration structures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"109 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924001241\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924001241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于信息通信技术在社会中的作用日益普遍,这意味着必须从小培养数字技能,因此引入数字课程已成为热门话题。由于缺乏内部专业知识,政府往往需要依靠外部参与者提供数字教育专业知识。因此,这些项目的组织结构类似于协作治理制度,具有归因于特定利益相关者的不同角色。在本研究中,我们探索了DigEd项目的跨部门合作结构,该项目旨在在瑞士地方一级的义务教育和义务教育后教育的不同周期中引入数字教育。调查结果表明,在项目的试点阶段,由于缺乏领导和没有明确每个伙伴的作用,无法在有关伙伴之间形成共同的理解,导致少数有影响力的行动者占据主导地位。这一趋势通过图形SNA分析得到证实,该分析清楚地说明了非国家行为者的中心地位。这一贡献表明,评估者不仅应该对项目的效果感兴趣,而且应该对它们的内部协作结构感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the effects of collaborative governance: Case of a digital education project
The introduction of digital curricula has become topical due to the increasingly pervasive role of ICTs in the society implying the necessity to develop digital skills from a young age. Because of the lack of in-house know-how, governments often need to rely on external actors providing digital education expertise. Organisational structures of such programs thus resemble collaborative governance regimes with distinct roles attributed to specific stakeholders. In this study, we explore cross-sector collaboration structures of the DigEd project aiming to introduce digital education in different cycles of compulsory and post-compulsory schooling on the local level in Switzerland. Findings indicate that the lack of leadership and of clarification of each partner’s role during the pilot phase of the project did not allow for the creation of a shared understanding among the involved partners and led to the domination of a limited number of influential actors. This tendency is confirmed through a graphic SNA analysis clearly illustrating the centrality of non-state actors. This contribution shows that it is not only the effects of projects that should be of interest to evaluators, but also their internal collaboration structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信