{"title":"评估协作治理的效果:以数字教育项目为例。","authors":"Stéphane Bonny, Tereza Cahlikova","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The introduction of digital curricula has become topical due to the increasingly pervasive role of ICTs in the society implying the necessity to develop digital skills from a young age. Because of the lack of in-house know-how, governments often need to rely on external actors providing digital education expertise. Organisational structures of such programs thus resemble collaborative governance regimes with distinct roles attributed to specific stakeholders. In this study, we explore cross-sector collaboration structures of the DigEd project aiming to introduce digital education in different cycles of compulsory and post-compulsory schooling on the local level in Switzerland. Findings indicate that the lack of leadership and of clarification of each partner’s role during the pilot phase of the project did not allow for the creation of a shared understanding among the involved partners and led to the domination of a limited number of influential actors. This tendency is confirmed through a graphic SNA analysis clearly illustrating the centrality of non-state actors. This contribution shows that it is not only the effects of projects that should be of interest to evaluators, but also their internal collaboration structures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 102522"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the effects of collaborative governance: Case of a digital education project\",\"authors\":\"Stéphane Bonny, Tereza Cahlikova\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The introduction of digital curricula has become topical due to the increasingly pervasive role of ICTs in the society implying the necessity to develop digital skills from a young age. Because of the lack of in-house know-how, governments often need to rely on external actors providing digital education expertise. Organisational structures of such programs thus resemble collaborative governance regimes with distinct roles attributed to specific stakeholders. In this study, we explore cross-sector collaboration structures of the DigEd project aiming to introduce digital education in different cycles of compulsory and post-compulsory schooling on the local level in Switzerland. Findings indicate that the lack of leadership and of clarification of each partner’s role during the pilot phase of the project did not allow for the creation of a shared understanding among the involved partners and led to the domination of a limited number of influential actors. This tendency is confirmed through a graphic SNA analysis clearly illustrating the centrality of non-state actors. This contribution shows that it is not only the effects of projects that should be of interest to evaluators, but also their internal collaboration structures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"109 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102522\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924001241\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718924001241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the effects of collaborative governance: Case of a digital education project
The introduction of digital curricula has become topical due to the increasingly pervasive role of ICTs in the society implying the necessity to develop digital skills from a young age. Because of the lack of in-house know-how, governments often need to rely on external actors providing digital education expertise. Organisational structures of such programs thus resemble collaborative governance regimes with distinct roles attributed to specific stakeholders. In this study, we explore cross-sector collaboration structures of the DigEd project aiming to introduce digital education in different cycles of compulsory and post-compulsory schooling on the local level in Switzerland. Findings indicate that the lack of leadership and of clarification of each partner’s role during the pilot phase of the project did not allow for the creation of a shared understanding among the involved partners and led to the domination of a limited number of influential actors. This tendency is confirmed through a graphic SNA analysis clearly illustrating the centrality of non-state actors. This contribution shows that it is not only the effects of projects that should be of interest to evaluators, but also their internal collaboration structures.
期刊介绍:
Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.