成人ITP治疗的见解:管理算法和多模式治疗的作用。

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Waleed Ghanima, Adam Cuker, Marc Michel
{"title":"成人ITP治疗的见解:管理算法和多模式治疗的作用。","authors":"Waleed Ghanima, Adam Cuker, Marc Michel","doi":"10.1182/hematology.2024000594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is continuously evolving with the development and introduction of newer therapies and a better understanding of the disease. Corticosteroids still represent the cornerstone of first-line treatment. Patients who fail to achieve remission with a short course of corticosteroids require subsequent therapy. Most guidelines recommend starting with either a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA), rituximab, or fostamatinib since these agents have been investigated in randomized trials and have well-characterized efficacy and safety profiles. Patients' involvement to reach a shared decision regarding choice of therapy is essential as these treatments have different modes of administration and mechanisms of action. Less than 10% will fail to respond to and/or be intolerant of multiple second-line therapeutic options and thus be considered to have refractory ITP and require a third-line therapeutic option. Such patients may require drugs with different targets or a combination of drugs with different mechanisms of action. Combining a TPO-RA and an immunomodulatory agent may be an appropriate approach at this stage. Many studies have been conducted during the last 2 decades investigating the efficacy and safety of combinations strategies for first and later lines of therapies. Yet none of these are recommended by current guidelines or have gained wide acceptance and consensus.</p>","PeriodicalId":12973,"journal":{"name":"Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program","volume":"2024 1","pages":"678-684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights on treatment of adult ITP: algorithm for management and role of multimodal therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Waleed Ghanima, Adam Cuker, Marc Michel\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/hematology.2024000594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is continuously evolving with the development and introduction of newer therapies and a better understanding of the disease. Corticosteroids still represent the cornerstone of first-line treatment. Patients who fail to achieve remission with a short course of corticosteroids require subsequent therapy. Most guidelines recommend starting with either a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA), rituximab, or fostamatinib since these agents have been investigated in randomized trials and have well-characterized efficacy and safety profiles. Patients' involvement to reach a shared decision regarding choice of therapy is essential as these treatments have different modes of administration and mechanisms of action. Less than 10% will fail to respond to and/or be intolerant of multiple second-line therapeutic options and thus be considered to have refractory ITP and require a third-line therapeutic option. Such patients may require drugs with different targets or a combination of drugs with different mechanisms of action. Combining a TPO-RA and an immunomodulatory agent may be an appropriate approach at this stage. Many studies have been conducted during the last 2 decades investigating the efficacy and safety of combinations strategies for first and later lines of therapies. Yet none of these are recommended by current guidelines or have gained wide acceptance and consensus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"678-684\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665734/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/hematology.2024000594\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/hematology.2024000594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的管理随着新疗法的发展和引入以及对疾病的更好理解而不断发展。皮质类固醇仍然是一线治疗的基石。短期皮质类固醇治疗未能达到缓解的患者需要后续治疗。大多数指南推荐从血小板生成素受体激动剂(TPO-RA)、利妥昔单抗或福司他替尼开始,因为这些药物已经在随机试验中进行了研究,并且具有良好的疗效和安全性。由于这些治疗具有不同的给药模式和作用机制,患者参与以达成关于治疗选择的共同决定是必不可少的。少于10%的患者将对多种二线治疗方案无效和/或不耐受,因此被认为是难治性ITP,需要三线治疗方案。这类患者可能需要具有不同靶点的药物或具有不同作用机制的药物组合。在这个阶段,联合TPO-RA和免疫调节剂可能是一种合适的方法。在过去的二十年中进行了许多研究,调查了一线和后期治疗的联合策略的有效性和安全性。然而,这些都不是目前的指南所推荐的,也没有得到广泛的接受和共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Insights on treatment of adult ITP: algorithm for management and role of multimodal therapy.

The management of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is continuously evolving with the development and introduction of newer therapies and a better understanding of the disease. Corticosteroids still represent the cornerstone of first-line treatment. Patients who fail to achieve remission with a short course of corticosteroids require subsequent therapy. Most guidelines recommend starting with either a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA), rituximab, or fostamatinib since these agents have been investigated in randomized trials and have well-characterized efficacy and safety profiles. Patients' involvement to reach a shared decision regarding choice of therapy is essential as these treatments have different modes of administration and mechanisms of action. Less than 10% will fail to respond to and/or be intolerant of multiple second-line therapeutic options and thus be considered to have refractory ITP and require a third-line therapeutic option. Such patients may require drugs with different targets or a combination of drugs with different mechanisms of action. Combining a TPO-RA and an immunomodulatory agent may be an appropriate approach at this stage. Many studies have been conducted during the last 2 decades investigating the efficacy and safety of combinations strategies for first and later lines of therapies. Yet none of these are recommended by current guidelines or have gained wide acceptance and consensus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program
Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-HEMATOLOGY
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Hematology, the ASH Education Program, is published annually by the American Society of Hematology (ASH) in one volume per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信