绩效付费医疗对新诊断的老年2型糖尿病患者死亡率和心血管结局的影响:一项全国性人群队列研究

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Fu-Shun Yen MD , James Cheng-Chung Wei MD, PhD , Shih-Yi Lin MD , Jeffrey Hsu BS , Yun-Kai Yeh MD , Yu-Han Huang MS , Tzu-Ju Hsu MS , Der-Yang Cho MD , Chii-Min Hwu MD , Chih-Cheng Hsu DrPH
{"title":"绩效付费医疗对新诊断的老年2型糖尿病患者死亡率和心血管结局的影响:一项全国性人群队列研究","authors":"Fu-Shun Yen MD ,&nbsp;James Cheng-Chung Wei MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Shih-Yi Lin MD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Hsu BS ,&nbsp;Yun-Kai Yeh MD ,&nbsp;Yu-Han Huang MS ,&nbsp;Tzu-Ju Hsu MS ,&nbsp;Der-Yang Cho MD ,&nbsp;Chii-Min Hwu MD ,&nbsp;Chih-Cheng Hsu DrPH","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the long-term effects of pay-for-performance (P4P) care in the geriatric population with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective longitudinal cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>A total of 6607 propensity score-matched pairs of patients with newly diagnosed T2D who received either P4P care or standard care as identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cox regression models were used to assess differences in risk of outcomes between P4P and non-P4P care. Primary outcomes and measures include all-cause mortality, hospital admissions due to cardiovascular events, dialysis initiation, severe hyperglycemia, and severe hypoglycemia. Multivariable Cox regression models were performed to calculate hazard ratios among and within groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The multivariable-adjusted model showed that patients with P4P care had a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.37; 95% CI, 0.35–0.39], stroke (aHR, 0.80 95% CI, 0.72–0.88), myocardial infarction (aHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48–0.67), heart failure (aHR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69–0.81), and dialysis (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53–0.82) compared with those not receiving P4P care. However, there were no significant differences in the risk of severe hyperglycemia (aHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82–1.03) and severe hypoglycemia (aHR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92–1.17) between the 2 groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>This nationwide cohort study suggests that the P4P program may reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, dialysis needs, and mortality in older patients with T2D without increasing the risk of severe hypoglycemia. P4P may be an effective management strategy for older patients with T2D.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 2","pages":"Article 105382"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Pay-for-Performance Care on the Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Fu-Shun Yen MD ,&nbsp;James Cheng-Chung Wei MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Shih-Yi Lin MD ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Hsu BS ,&nbsp;Yun-Kai Yeh MD ,&nbsp;Yu-Han Huang MS ,&nbsp;Tzu-Ju Hsu MS ,&nbsp;Der-Yang Cho MD ,&nbsp;Chii-Min Hwu MD ,&nbsp;Chih-Cheng Hsu DrPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the long-term effects of pay-for-performance (P4P) care in the geriatric population with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective longitudinal cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>A total of 6607 propensity score-matched pairs of patients with newly diagnosed T2D who received either P4P care or standard care as identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cox regression models were used to assess differences in risk of outcomes between P4P and non-P4P care. Primary outcomes and measures include all-cause mortality, hospital admissions due to cardiovascular events, dialysis initiation, severe hyperglycemia, and severe hypoglycemia. Multivariable Cox regression models were performed to calculate hazard ratios among and within groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The multivariable-adjusted model showed that patients with P4P care had a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.37; 95% CI, 0.35–0.39], stroke (aHR, 0.80 95% CI, 0.72–0.88), myocardial infarction (aHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48–0.67), heart failure (aHR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69–0.81), and dialysis (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53–0.82) compared with those not receiving P4P care. However, there were no significant differences in the risk of severe hyperglycemia (aHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82–1.03) and severe hypoglycemia (aHR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92–1.17) between the 2 groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><div>This nationwide cohort study suggests that the P4P program may reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, dialysis needs, and mortality in older patients with T2D without increasing the risk of severe hypoglycemia. P4P may be an effective management strategy for older patients with T2D.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 105382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024008041\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861024008041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价按绩效付费(P4P)护理在老年新诊断2型糖尿病(T2D)患者中的长期效果。设计:回顾性纵向队列研究。​方法:采用Cox回归模型评估P4P和非P4P护理之间结局风险的差异。主要结局和措施包括全因死亡率、因心血管事件住院、开始透析、严重高血糖和严重低血糖。采用多变量Cox回归模型计算组间和组内风险比。结果:多变量校正模型显示,接受P4P护理的患者全因死亡风险显著降低(校正风险比[aHR], 0.37;95% CI, 0.35-0.39),卒中(aHR, 0.80 95% CI, 0.72-0.88),心肌梗死(aHR, 0.57;95% CI, 0.48-0.67),心力衰竭(aHR, 0.75;95% CI, 0.69-0.81)和透析(aHR, 0.66;95% CI, 0.53-0.82)与未接受P4P护理的患者相比。然而,两组发生严重高血糖的风险无显著差异(aHR, 0.92;95% CI, 0.82-1.03)和严重低血糖(aHR, 1.04;95% CI, 0.92-1.17)。结论和意义:这项全国性队列研究表明,P4P方案可以降低老年T2D患者心血管事件、透析需求和死亡率的风险,而不会增加严重低血糖的风险。P4P可能是老年T2D患者有效的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Pay-for-Performance Care on the Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults with Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

Objectives

To evaluate the long-term effects of pay-for-performance (P4P) care in the geriatric population with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Design

Retrospective longitudinal cohort study.

Setting and Participants

A total of 6607 propensity score-matched pairs of patients with newly diagnosed T2D who received either P4P care or standard care as identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019.

Methods

Cox regression models were used to assess differences in risk of outcomes between P4P and non-P4P care. Primary outcomes and measures include all-cause mortality, hospital admissions due to cardiovascular events, dialysis initiation, severe hyperglycemia, and severe hypoglycemia. Multivariable Cox regression models were performed to calculate hazard ratios among and within groups.

Results

The multivariable-adjusted model showed that patients with P4P care had a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.37; 95% CI, 0.35–0.39], stroke (aHR, 0.80 95% CI, 0.72–0.88), myocardial infarction (aHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48–0.67), heart failure (aHR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69–0.81), and dialysis (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53–0.82) compared with those not receiving P4P care. However, there were no significant differences in the risk of severe hyperglycemia (aHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82–1.03) and severe hypoglycemia (aHR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92–1.17) between the 2 groups.

Conclusions and Implications

This nationwide cohort study suggests that the P4P program may reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, dialysis needs, and mortality in older patients with T2D without increasing the risk of severe hypoglycemia. P4P may be an effective management strategy for older patients with T2D.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信