KRAS变异与胆道癌患者的生存结局和基因组改变相关

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1200/PO.24.00263
Rebecca Gelfer, Aiste Gulla, Hannah L Kalvin, Yi Song, James Harding, Ghassan K Abou-Alfa, Eileen M O'Reilly, Wungki Park, Rohit Chandwani, Alice Wei, Peter Kingham, Jeffrey Drebin, Vinod Balachandran, Michael D'Angelica, Kevin Soares, Mithat Gonen, William R Jarnagin
{"title":"KRAS变异与胆道癌患者的生存结局和基因组改变相关","authors":"Rebecca Gelfer, Aiste Gulla, Hannah L Kalvin, Yi Song, James Harding, Ghassan K Abou-Alfa, Eileen M O'Reilly, Wungki Park, Rohit Chandwani, Alice Wei, Peter Kingham, Jeffrey Drebin, Vinod Balachandran, Michael D'Angelica, Kevin Soares, Mithat Gonen, William R Jarnagin","doi":"10.1200/PO.24.00263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong><i>KRAS</i> variants are associated with poor outcomes in biliary tract cancers (BTCs). This study assesses the prevalence of <i>KRAS</i> variants and their association with survival and recurrence in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC), and gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional, single-institution study at Memorial Sloan Kettering, tumors from 985 patients treated between 2004 and 2022 with IHC, EHC, and GB who underwent either curative-intent resection or were treated with chemotherapy for unresectable disease were used for targeted sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 985 patients sequenced, 15% had a <i>KRAS</i> mutation. Five hundred and seventy-two had unresectable disease (n = 395 IHC, n = 71 EHC, n = 106 GB) and 413 were treated with curative-intent resection (n = 175 IHC, n = 119 EHC, and n = 119 GB). Median follow-up time was 18 months (IQR, 11-31). <i>KRAS G12D</i> mutations were most common in IHC (38%) and EHC (37%) tumors. Mutations in <i>SF3B1</i> co-occurred with mutant <i>KRAS</i> in IHC and EHC, with comutant resectable patients having worse survival after adjusting for tumor type (hazard ratio [HR], 4.04 [95% CI, 1.45 to 11.2]; <i>P</i> = .007). <i>KRAS G12</i> mutations were associated with worse survival in patients with IHC compared with wild-type (WT) or other <i>KRAS</i> mutations, regardless of resection status (unresectable <i>P</i> < .001, resectable <i>P</i> = .011). After adjusting for clinical covariates, <i>KRAS</i> G12 mutations remained a prognostic indicator for patients with IHC compared with WT (HR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.41 to 2.80]; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adverse impact of <i>KRAS</i> mutations in BTC is driven by G12 alterations in patients with IHC regardless of resection status, which was not observed in GB or EHC. There are unique comutational partners in distinct BTC subsets. These differences have important clinical implications in the era of KRAS-targeted therapeutics.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400263"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>KRAS</i> Variants Are Associated With Survival Outcomes and Genomic Alterations in Biliary Tract Cancers.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Gelfer, Aiste Gulla, Hannah L Kalvin, Yi Song, James Harding, Ghassan K Abou-Alfa, Eileen M O'Reilly, Wungki Park, Rohit Chandwani, Alice Wei, Peter Kingham, Jeffrey Drebin, Vinod Balachandran, Michael D'Angelica, Kevin Soares, Mithat Gonen, William R Jarnagin\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO.24.00263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong><i>KRAS</i> variants are associated with poor outcomes in biliary tract cancers (BTCs). This study assesses the prevalence of <i>KRAS</i> variants and their association with survival and recurrence in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC), and gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional, single-institution study at Memorial Sloan Kettering, tumors from 985 patients treated between 2004 and 2022 with IHC, EHC, and GB who underwent either curative-intent resection or were treated with chemotherapy for unresectable disease were used for targeted sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 985 patients sequenced, 15% had a <i>KRAS</i> mutation. Five hundred and seventy-two had unresectable disease (n = 395 IHC, n = 71 EHC, n = 106 GB) and 413 were treated with curative-intent resection (n = 175 IHC, n = 119 EHC, and n = 119 GB). Median follow-up time was 18 months (IQR, 11-31). <i>KRAS G12D</i> mutations were most common in IHC (38%) and EHC (37%) tumors. Mutations in <i>SF3B1</i> co-occurred with mutant <i>KRAS</i> in IHC and EHC, with comutant resectable patients having worse survival after adjusting for tumor type (hazard ratio [HR], 4.04 [95% CI, 1.45 to 11.2]; <i>P</i> = .007). <i>KRAS G12</i> mutations were associated with worse survival in patients with IHC compared with wild-type (WT) or other <i>KRAS</i> mutations, regardless of resection status (unresectable <i>P</i> < .001, resectable <i>P</i> = .011). After adjusting for clinical covariates, <i>KRAS</i> G12 mutations remained a prognostic indicator for patients with IHC compared with WT (HR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.41 to 2.80]; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adverse impact of <i>KRAS</i> mutations in BTC is driven by G12 alterations in patients with IHC regardless of resection status, which was not observed in GB or EHC. There are unique comutational partners in distinct BTC subsets. These differences have important clinical implications in the era of KRAS-targeted therapeutics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e2400263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00263\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00263","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:KRAS变异与胆道癌(btc)预后不良相关。本研究评估了KRAS变异在肝内胆管癌(IHC)、肝外胆管癌(EHC)和胆囊腺癌(GB)患者中的患病率及其与生存和复发的关系。方法:在Memorial Sloan Kettering的这项横断面单机构研究中,来自2004年至2022年期间接受IHC, EHC和GB治疗的985例患者的肿瘤进行了靶向测序,这些患者接受了治愈性切除或因不可切除的疾病接受了化疗。结果:在测序的985例患者中,15%的患者有KRAS突变。572例无法切除(395例IHC, 71例EHC, 106 GB), 413例进行了治愈性切除(175例IHC, 119例EHC, 119 GB)。中位随访时间为18个月(IQR, 11-31)。KRAS G12D突变在IHC(38%)和EHC(37%)肿瘤中最为常见。在IHC和EHC中,SF3B1突变与KRAS突变共同发生,在调整肿瘤类型后,可切除的患者生存率较差(危险比[HR] 4.04 [95% CI, 1.45至11.2];P = .007)。与野生型(WT)或其他KRAS突变相比,KRAS G12突变与IHC患者更差的生存率相关,无论切除情况如何(不可切除P < 0.001,可切除P = 0.011)。在调整临床协变量后,与WT相比,KRAS G12突变仍然是IHC患者的预后指标(HR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.41至2.80];P < 0.001)。结论:KRAS突变在BTC中的不良影响是由IHC患者的G12改变驱动的,与切除状态无关,而在GB或EHC中未观察到这一点。在不同的比特币子集中存在唯一的计算伙伴。这些差异在kras靶向治疗时代具有重要的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
KRAS Variants Are Associated With Survival Outcomes and Genomic Alterations in Biliary Tract Cancers.

Purpose: KRAS variants are associated with poor outcomes in biliary tract cancers (BTCs). This study assesses the prevalence of KRAS variants and their association with survival and recurrence in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC), and gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GB).

Methods: In this cross-sectional, single-institution study at Memorial Sloan Kettering, tumors from 985 patients treated between 2004 and 2022 with IHC, EHC, and GB who underwent either curative-intent resection or were treated with chemotherapy for unresectable disease were used for targeted sequencing.

Results: Of the 985 patients sequenced, 15% had a KRAS mutation. Five hundred and seventy-two had unresectable disease (n = 395 IHC, n = 71 EHC, n = 106 GB) and 413 were treated with curative-intent resection (n = 175 IHC, n = 119 EHC, and n = 119 GB). Median follow-up time was 18 months (IQR, 11-31). KRAS G12D mutations were most common in IHC (38%) and EHC (37%) tumors. Mutations in SF3B1 co-occurred with mutant KRAS in IHC and EHC, with comutant resectable patients having worse survival after adjusting for tumor type (hazard ratio [HR], 4.04 [95% CI, 1.45 to 11.2]; P = .007). KRAS G12 mutations were associated with worse survival in patients with IHC compared with wild-type (WT) or other KRAS mutations, regardless of resection status (unresectable P < .001, resectable P = .011). After adjusting for clinical covariates, KRAS G12 mutations remained a prognostic indicator for patients with IHC compared with WT (HR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.41 to 2.80]; P < .001).

Conclusion: The adverse impact of KRAS mutations in BTC is driven by G12 alterations in patients with IHC regardless of resection status, which was not observed in GB or EHC. There are unique comutational partners in distinct BTC subsets. These differences have important clinical implications in the era of KRAS-targeted therapeutics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信