在平价医疗法案后开始透析的患者中,医疗保险登记和支出。

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Virginia Wang, Lauren E Wilson, Neil P Rowen, Caroline E Sloan, Matthew L Maciejewski, Bradley G Hammill
{"title":"在平价医疗法案后开始透析的患者中,医疗保险登记和支出。","authors":"Virginia Wang, Lauren E Wilson, Neil P Rowen, Caroline E Sloan, Matthew L Maciejewski, Bradley G Hammill","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Medicare finances health care for most US patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), regardless of age. Medicare enrollment may have slowed for patients with incident ESKD who gained access to new private insurance options with the 2014 passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and introduction of the ACA Marketplace.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe trends in public and private insurance coverage and dialysis spending among patients with incident ESKD from 2012 to 2017.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This serial cross-sectional study included patients 18 to 64 years old in Colorado who were not enrolled in Medicare at dialysis initiation. Data analysis was conducted from May to August 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Introduction of the ACA Marketplace in 2014.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Medicare, Medicaid, or private insurance enrollment in the first year after dialysis initiation, and dialysis spending by insurance type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2005 patients included in the sample, 1416 (70.6%) were 45 to 64 years old, and 1259 (62.8%) were male. A lower proportion of patients with incident ESKD starting dialysis were newly enrolled in Medicare in the years following the ACA (361 of 713 [50.6%]) compared to 2 years prior (420 of 595 [70.6%]). Unadjusted rates of switching from Medicaid to Medicare 1 year after dialysis initiation decreased 14.3 percentage points over time (68.9% in 2012-2013 vs 58.3% and 54.6% in 2014-2015 and 2016-2017, respectively). Unadjusted rates of switching from private insurance to Medicare 1 year after dialysis initiation decreased by 22.3 percentage points (68.1% in 2012-2013 vs 52.2% and 45.8% in 2014-2015 and 2016-2017, respectively). Over the entire 2012 to 2017 period, quarterly dialysis spending in the first year of dialysis among patients with private insurance was higher than among those with Medicare coverage ($26 351-$29 781 vs $10 039-$12 741).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cross-sectional study demonstrates that lower Medicare enrollment rates over time among those initiating dialysis may be inducing higher social spending. This finding raises concerns about the effectiveness of Medicare policies and federal leverage to improve access, outcomes, and value of dialysis care.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"5 12","pages":"e244304"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicare Enrollment and Spending Among Patients Initiating Dialysis After the Affordable Care Act.\",\"authors\":\"Virginia Wang, Lauren E Wilson, Neil P Rowen, Caroline E Sloan, Matthew L Maciejewski, Bradley G Hammill\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Medicare finances health care for most US patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), regardless of age. Medicare enrollment may have slowed for patients with incident ESKD who gained access to new private insurance options with the 2014 passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and introduction of the ACA Marketplace.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe trends in public and private insurance coverage and dialysis spending among patients with incident ESKD from 2012 to 2017.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This serial cross-sectional study included patients 18 to 64 years old in Colorado who were not enrolled in Medicare at dialysis initiation. Data analysis was conducted from May to August 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Introduction of the ACA Marketplace in 2014.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Medicare, Medicaid, or private insurance enrollment in the first year after dialysis initiation, and dialysis spending by insurance type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2005 patients included in the sample, 1416 (70.6%) were 45 to 64 years old, and 1259 (62.8%) were male. A lower proportion of patients with incident ESKD starting dialysis were newly enrolled in Medicare in the years following the ACA (361 of 713 [50.6%]) compared to 2 years prior (420 of 595 [70.6%]). Unadjusted rates of switching from Medicaid to Medicare 1 year after dialysis initiation decreased 14.3 percentage points over time (68.9% in 2012-2013 vs 58.3% and 54.6% in 2014-2015 and 2016-2017, respectively). Unadjusted rates of switching from private insurance to Medicare 1 year after dialysis initiation decreased by 22.3 percentage points (68.1% in 2012-2013 vs 52.2% and 45.8% in 2014-2015 and 2016-2017, respectively). Over the entire 2012 to 2017 period, quarterly dialysis spending in the first year of dialysis among patients with private insurance was higher than among those with Medicare coverage ($26 351-$29 781 vs $10 039-$12 741).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This cross-sectional study demonstrates that lower Medicare enrollment rates over time among those initiating dialysis may be inducing higher social spending. This finding raises concerns about the effectiveness of Medicare policies and federal leverage to improve access, outcomes, and value of dialysis care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"5 12\",\"pages\":\"e244304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624581/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:医疗保险资助大多数美国终末期肾病(ESKD)患者的医疗保健,无论年龄大小。随着2014年《平价医疗法案》(ACA)的通过和ACA市场的引入,突发ESKD患者获得了新的私人保险选择,医疗保险登记可能已经放缓。目的:描述2012 - 2017年突发ESKD患者的公共和私人保险覆盖率和透析支出趋势。设计、环境和参与者:本系列横断面研究包括科罗拉多州18至64岁的患者,他们在透析开始时未参加医疗保险。数据分析时间为2023年5月至8月。曝光:2014年ACA市场的介绍。主要结果和措施:透析开始后第一年的医疗保险、医疗补助或私人保险登记,以及按保险类型划分的透析支出。结果:纳入的2005例患者中,45 ~ 64岁1416例(70.6%),男性1259例(62.8%)。与2年前(595 / 420 / 70.6%)相比,ACA实施后新入组的ESKD患者(713 / 361[50.6%])开始透析的比例较低。透析开始一年后从医疗补助转为医疗保险的未调整率随时间推移下降了14.3个百分点(2012-2013年为68.9%,2014-2015年和2016-2017年分别为58.3%和54.6%)。在透析开始一年后从私人保险转向医疗保险的未调整比率下降了22.3个百分点(2012-2013年为68.1%,2014-2015年和2016-2017年分别为52.2%和45.8%)。在整个2012年至2017年期间,有私人保险的患者在透析第一年的季度透析支出高于有医疗保险的患者(26美元 351- 29美元 781 vs 10美元 039- 12美元 741)。结论和相关性:这项横断面研究表明,随着时间的推移,在开始透析的患者中,较低的医疗保险登记率可能会导致较高的社会支出。这一发现引起了人们对医疗保险政策和联邦政府在改善透析护理的可及性、结果和价值方面的有效性的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medicare Enrollment and Spending Among Patients Initiating Dialysis After the Affordable Care Act.

Importance: Medicare finances health care for most US patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), regardless of age. Medicare enrollment may have slowed for patients with incident ESKD who gained access to new private insurance options with the 2014 passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and introduction of the ACA Marketplace.

Objective: To describe trends in public and private insurance coverage and dialysis spending among patients with incident ESKD from 2012 to 2017.

Design, setting, and participants: This serial cross-sectional study included patients 18 to 64 years old in Colorado who were not enrolled in Medicare at dialysis initiation. Data analysis was conducted from May to August 2023.

Exposure: Introduction of the ACA Marketplace in 2014.

Main outcomes and measures: Medicare, Medicaid, or private insurance enrollment in the first year after dialysis initiation, and dialysis spending by insurance type.

Results: Of 2005 patients included in the sample, 1416 (70.6%) were 45 to 64 years old, and 1259 (62.8%) were male. A lower proportion of patients with incident ESKD starting dialysis were newly enrolled in Medicare in the years following the ACA (361 of 713 [50.6%]) compared to 2 years prior (420 of 595 [70.6%]). Unadjusted rates of switching from Medicaid to Medicare 1 year after dialysis initiation decreased 14.3 percentage points over time (68.9% in 2012-2013 vs 58.3% and 54.6% in 2014-2015 and 2016-2017, respectively). Unadjusted rates of switching from private insurance to Medicare 1 year after dialysis initiation decreased by 22.3 percentage points (68.1% in 2012-2013 vs 52.2% and 45.8% in 2014-2015 and 2016-2017, respectively). Over the entire 2012 to 2017 period, quarterly dialysis spending in the first year of dialysis among patients with private insurance was higher than among those with Medicare coverage ($26 351-$29 781 vs $10 039-$12 741).

Conclusions and relevance: This cross-sectional study demonstrates that lower Medicare enrollment rates over time among those initiating dialysis may be inducing higher social spending. This finding raises concerns about the effectiveness of Medicare policies and federal leverage to improve access, outcomes, and value of dialysis care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信