导航骨科迷宫作为一个新的病人:一个关于医疗补助覆盖和获得专业外科医生的国家神秘来电者研究。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Nicholas A Felan, Elizabeth Garcia-Creighton, Ankit Hirpara, Isabella Narváez, Adam Miller, Alexis J Batiste, Daniel J Stokes, Ryan Tseng, Alessandra Santiago, Anthony Smyth, Nicholas R Pulciano, Benjamin R Wharton, Eric C McCarty, Tyler M Muffly
{"title":"导航骨科迷宫作为一个新的病人:一个关于医疗补助覆盖和获得专业外科医生的国家神秘来电者研究。","authors":"Nicholas A Felan, Elizabeth Garcia-Creighton, Ankit Hirpara, Isabella Narváez, Adam Miller, Alexis J Batiste, Daniel J Stokes, Ryan Tseng, Alessandra Santiago, Anthony Smyth, Nicholas R Pulciano, Benjamin R Wharton, Eric C McCarty, Tyler M Muffly","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medicaid coverage is associated with longer appointment wait times, decreased access to care, and poorer health outcomes compared with private insurance across medical subspecialties. The purpose of this study was to evaluate new patient appointment wait times for subspecialty Orthopaedic care based on insurance type and to identify factors influencing these wait times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Orthopaedic physicians were identified using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons patient-facing database in the fields of Adult Reconstruction, Foot and Ankle, Hand, Sports Medicine, Spine, Pediatric, and General Orthopaedic surgery. Mystery callers, posing as patients with either Medicaid or Blue Cross/Blue Shield (BCBS) insurance, contacted physicians to request the next available new patient appointment. The business days until the first available new patient appointment were recorded and analyzed using a linear mixed Poisson model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,002 phone calls were made to 501 unique physicians in 47 states. Among the 349 physicians meeting inclusion criteria, 37% (n = 130) did not accept Medicaid. Medicaid patients experienced a 10% longer wait for a new patient appointment compared with patients with BCBS (incidence rate ratio: 1.10; CI: 1.05 to 1.15; P < 0.01) with mean wait times of 24.9 business days (SD ± 24) and 19.6 business days (SD ± 23), respectively. Increased waiting times were also associated with academic institutions ( P < 0.01), prolonged call times ( P < 0.01), and specific geographic regions ( P < 0.05). Our model achieved an R-squared value of 0.94, demonstrating strong explanatory power.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with Medicaid experience longer wait times and decreased access to care when scheduling an appointment with an Orthopaedic surgeon compared with patients with private insurance. This may be due to reimbursement structures in Medicaid that do not cover the full cost of treatment. Aside from advocating for higher reimbursement rates, telehealth initiatives may help bridge this gap to ensure accessibility to orthopaedic surgery for all patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e181-e190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating the Orthopaedic Maze as a New Patient: A National Mystery Caller Study on Medicaid Coverage and Access to Specialized Surgeons.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas A Felan, Elizabeth Garcia-Creighton, Ankit Hirpara, Isabella Narváez, Adam Miller, Alexis J Batiste, Daniel J Stokes, Ryan Tseng, Alessandra Santiago, Anthony Smyth, Nicholas R Pulciano, Benjamin R Wharton, Eric C McCarty, Tyler M Muffly\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medicaid coverage is associated with longer appointment wait times, decreased access to care, and poorer health outcomes compared with private insurance across medical subspecialties. The purpose of this study was to evaluate new patient appointment wait times for subspecialty Orthopaedic care based on insurance type and to identify factors influencing these wait times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Orthopaedic physicians were identified using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons patient-facing database in the fields of Adult Reconstruction, Foot and Ankle, Hand, Sports Medicine, Spine, Pediatric, and General Orthopaedic surgery. Mystery callers, posing as patients with either Medicaid or Blue Cross/Blue Shield (BCBS) insurance, contacted physicians to request the next available new patient appointment. The business days until the first available new patient appointment were recorded and analyzed using a linear mixed Poisson model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,002 phone calls were made to 501 unique physicians in 47 states. Among the 349 physicians meeting inclusion criteria, 37% (n = 130) did not accept Medicaid. Medicaid patients experienced a 10% longer wait for a new patient appointment compared with patients with BCBS (incidence rate ratio: 1.10; CI: 1.05 to 1.15; P < 0.01) with mean wait times of 24.9 business days (SD ± 24) and 19.6 business days (SD ± 23), respectively. Increased waiting times were also associated with academic institutions ( P < 0.01), prolonged call times ( P < 0.01), and specific geographic regions ( P < 0.05). Our model achieved an R-squared value of 0.94, demonstrating strong explanatory power.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with Medicaid experience longer wait times and decreased access to care when scheduling an appointment with an Orthopaedic surgeon compared with patients with private insurance. This may be due to reimbursement structures in Medicaid that do not cover the full cost of treatment. Aside from advocating for higher reimbursement rates, telehealth initiatives may help bridge this gap to ensure accessibility to orthopaedic surgery for all patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e181-e190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00668\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00668","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:与医疗亚专科的私人保险相比,医疗补助覆盖范围与更长的预约等待时间、更少的护理机会和更差的健康结果有关。本研究的目的是评估基于保险类型的亚专科骨科护理的新患者预约等待时间,并确定影响这些等待时间的因素。方法:使用美国骨科医师学会面向患者的数据库,在成人重建、足踝、手部、运动医学、脊柱、儿科和普通骨科等领域确定骨科医生。神秘的来电者,冒充有医疗补助或蓝十字/蓝盾(BCBS)保险的病人,联系医生,要求下一个可用的新病人预约。使用线性混合泊松模型记录和分析直到第一个可用的新患者预约的工作日。结果:总共给47个州的501位医生打了1002个电话。在符合纳入标准的349名医生中,37% (n = 130)不接受医疗补助。与BCBS患者相比,医疗补助患者等待新患者预约的时间要长10%(发病率比:1.10;CI: 1.05 ~ 1.15;P < 0.01),平均等待时间分别为24.9工作日(SD±24)和19.6工作日(SD±23)。等待时间增加还与学术机构(P < 0.01)、呼叫时间延长(P < 0.01)和特定地理区域(P < 0.05)有关。我们的模型的r平方值为0.94,具有很强的解释力。结论:与拥有私人保险的患者相比,接受医疗补助的患者在预约整形外科医生时经历了更长的等待时间和更少的护理机会。这可能是由于医疗补助计划的报销结构不包括全部治疗费用。除了提倡更高的报销率外,远程保健倡议可能有助于弥合这一差距,以确保所有患者都能获得骨科手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating the Orthopaedic Maze as a New Patient: A National Mystery Caller Study on Medicaid Coverage and Access to Specialized Surgeons.

Introduction: Medicaid coverage is associated with longer appointment wait times, decreased access to care, and poorer health outcomes compared with private insurance across medical subspecialties. The purpose of this study was to evaluate new patient appointment wait times for subspecialty Orthopaedic care based on insurance type and to identify factors influencing these wait times.

Methods: Orthopaedic physicians were identified using the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons patient-facing database in the fields of Adult Reconstruction, Foot and Ankle, Hand, Sports Medicine, Spine, Pediatric, and General Orthopaedic surgery. Mystery callers, posing as patients with either Medicaid or Blue Cross/Blue Shield (BCBS) insurance, contacted physicians to request the next available new patient appointment. The business days until the first available new patient appointment were recorded and analyzed using a linear mixed Poisson model.

Results: A total of 1,002 phone calls were made to 501 unique physicians in 47 states. Among the 349 physicians meeting inclusion criteria, 37% (n = 130) did not accept Medicaid. Medicaid patients experienced a 10% longer wait for a new patient appointment compared with patients with BCBS (incidence rate ratio: 1.10; CI: 1.05 to 1.15; P < 0.01) with mean wait times of 24.9 business days (SD ± 24) and 19.6 business days (SD ± 23), respectively. Increased waiting times were also associated with academic institutions ( P < 0.01), prolonged call times ( P < 0.01), and specific geographic regions ( P < 0.05). Our model achieved an R-squared value of 0.94, demonstrating strong explanatory power.

Conclusion: Patients with Medicaid experience longer wait times and decreased access to care when scheduling an appointment with an Orthopaedic surgeon compared with patients with private insurance. This may be due to reimbursement structures in Medicaid that do not cover the full cost of treatment. Aside from advocating for higher reimbursement rates, telehealth initiatives may help bridge this gap to ensure accessibility to orthopaedic surgery for all patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信