{"title":"实施音乐医学改善腹部或骨盆手术后疼痛结局:一个质量改善项目。","authors":"Amy B Foraker, Pamela Love","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Define the impact of the implementation of evidence-based music medicine (MM) on pain management outcomes after abdominal and pelvic surgery when combined with usual care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This quality improvement project implemented MM in a hospital postanesthesia care unit using a pretest-posttest design. The Roy Adaptation Model and Kotter's Change theory guided all project phases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nursing staff were educated in-person, via electronic formats and paper handouts. A convenience sample of adults who underwent abdominal or pelvic surgery was offered a preselected MM playlist (via earphones and MP3 players) in addition to usual care during the Phase I recovery period. The outcomes included administered opioids (oral morphine milligram equivalents), pain levels (numerical rating scale), heart rate, respiratory rate, and systolic blood pressure. The outcomes for those who accepted MM (music group) were compared to those for patients admitted to the postanesthesia care unit 1 month before project implementation (baseline group).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The music group data revealed highly significant reductions in heart rate (P = .008, Cohen's d = 0.57) and systolic blood pressure (P < .001, Cohen's d = 0.78) at 30 minutes compared with pretest data. In contrast, the baseline group data showed no effect on systolic blood pressure levels (P = .274). The music group showed higher clinical significance (1.8 to >2-fold higher effect size) on reducing numerical rating scale scores at 30 minutes (music group: P < .001, Cohen's d = 1.19; baseline group: P = .008, Cohen's d = 0.55) and the final period in phase I (music group: P < .001, Cohen's d = 1.71; baseline group: P < .001, Cohen's d = 0.93). The mean morphine milligram equivalents dose for the music group (29.5 ± SD 19.8) compared with the baseline group (33.0 ± SD 26.6) was not significantly different (P = .376, Cohen's d = 0.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding MM with usual care leads to statistically and clinically significant reductions in pain indicators in adults who had abdominal or pelvic surgeries versus usual care alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing Music Medicine to Improve Pain Outcomes After Abdominal or Pelvic Surgery: A Quality Improvement Project.\",\"authors\":\"Amy B Foraker, Pamela Love\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Define the impact of the implementation of evidence-based music medicine (MM) on pain management outcomes after abdominal and pelvic surgery when combined with usual care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This quality improvement project implemented MM in a hospital postanesthesia care unit using a pretest-posttest design. The Roy Adaptation Model and Kotter's Change theory guided all project phases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nursing staff were educated in-person, via electronic formats and paper handouts. A convenience sample of adults who underwent abdominal or pelvic surgery was offered a preselected MM playlist (via earphones and MP3 players) in addition to usual care during the Phase I recovery period. The outcomes included administered opioids (oral morphine milligram equivalents), pain levels (numerical rating scale), heart rate, respiratory rate, and systolic blood pressure. The outcomes for those who accepted MM (music group) were compared to those for patients admitted to the postanesthesia care unit 1 month before project implementation (baseline group).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The music group data revealed highly significant reductions in heart rate (P = .008, Cohen's d = 0.57) and systolic blood pressure (P < .001, Cohen's d = 0.78) at 30 minutes compared with pretest data. In contrast, the baseline group data showed no effect on systolic blood pressure levels (P = .274). The music group showed higher clinical significance (1.8 to >2-fold higher effect size) on reducing numerical rating scale scores at 30 minutes (music group: P < .001, Cohen's d = 1.19; baseline group: P = .008, Cohen's d = 0.55) and the final period in phase I (music group: P < .001, Cohen's d = 1.71; baseline group: P < .001, Cohen's d = 0.93). The mean morphine milligram equivalents dose for the music group (29.5 ± SD 19.8) compared with the baseline group (33.0 ± SD 26.6) was not significantly different (P = .376, Cohen's d = 0.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding MM with usual care leads to statistically and clinically significant reductions in pain indicators in adults who had abdominal or pelvic surgeries versus usual care alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.113\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2024.06.113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:确定循证音乐医学(MM)结合常规护理对腹部和骨盆手术后疼痛管理结果的影响。设计:本质量改进项目在一家医院麻醉后护理病房采用前测后测设计实施MM。罗伊适应模型和科特的变化理论指导了项目的各个阶段。方法:对护理人员进行电子教育和纸质教育。在第一阶段恢复期间,除了常规护理外,还为接受腹部或骨盆手术的成年人提供了预先选择的MM播放列表(通过耳机和MP3播放器)。结果包括给予阿片类药物(口服吗啡毫克当量),疼痛水平(数值评定量表),心率,呼吸频率和收缩压。将接受MM(音乐组)的患者的结果与项目实施前1个月入住麻醉后护理单元的患者(基线组)的结果进行比较。研究结果:音乐组的数据显示,在30分钟时降低数值评定量表得分时,心率(P = 0.008, Cohen's d = 0.57)和收缩压(P = 2倍高的效应量)显著降低(音乐组:P)。结论:与单独进行常规护理相比,在常规护理下加入MM可导致腹部或骨盆手术成人疼痛指标的统计学和临床显著降低。
Implementing Music Medicine to Improve Pain Outcomes After Abdominal or Pelvic Surgery: A Quality Improvement Project.
Purpose: Define the impact of the implementation of evidence-based music medicine (MM) on pain management outcomes after abdominal and pelvic surgery when combined with usual care.
Design: This quality improvement project implemented MM in a hospital postanesthesia care unit using a pretest-posttest design. The Roy Adaptation Model and Kotter's Change theory guided all project phases.
Methods: Nursing staff were educated in-person, via electronic formats and paper handouts. A convenience sample of adults who underwent abdominal or pelvic surgery was offered a preselected MM playlist (via earphones and MP3 players) in addition to usual care during the Phase I recovery period. The outcomes included administered opioids (oral morphine milligram equivalents), pain levels (numerical rating scale), heart rate, respiratory rate, and systolic blood pressure. The outcomes for those who accepted MM (music group) were compared to those for patients admitted to the postanesthesia care unit 1 month before project implementation (baseline group).
Findings: The music group data revealed highly significant reductions in heart rate (P = .008, Cohen's d = 0.57) and systolic blood pressure (P < .001, Cohen's d = 0.78) at 30 minutes compared with pretest data. In contrast, the baseline group data showed no effect on systolic blood pressure levels (P = .274). The music group showed higher clinical significance (1.8 to >2-fold higher effect size) on reducing numerical rating scale scores at 30 minutes (music group: P < .001, Cohen's d = 1.19; baseline group: P = .008, Cohen's d = 0.55) and the final period in phase I (music group: P < .001, Cohen's d = 1.71; baseline group: P < .001, Cohen's d = 0.93). The mean morphine milligram equivalents dose for the music group (29.5 ± SD 19.8) compared with the baseline group (33.0 ± SD 26.6) was not significantly different (P = .376, Cohen's d = 0.18).
Conclusions: Adding MM with usual care leads to statistically and clinically significant reductions in pain indicators in adults who had abdominal or pelvic surgeries versus usual care alone.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.