Valentin Dones, Abigail Anne G Velasquez, Maureen G Dacuya, Kirsten Ermengild T Ignacio, Ella Teresa M Cavite, Ronan S Ibuna, Christian Rey D Rimando
{"title":"远程医疗在农村社区成人高血压管理中的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Valentin Dones, Abigail Anne G Velasquez, Maureen G Dacuya, Kirsten Ermengild T Ignacio, Ella Teresa M Cavite, Ronan S Ibuna, Christian Rey D Rimando","doi":"10.1002/pri.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telemedicine has emerged as an effective approach for managing hypertension, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is limited. This review evaluates telemedicine's role in providing essential remote healthcare services for hypertension management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We determined the effectiveness of telemedicine versus the usual care in hypertension management among adults living in rural settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on adults aged 18 and older with hypertension (blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg) using telehealth services in rural or community-based settings. We searched nine databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest, up to April 2024, without restrictions on language or publication year, focusing only on human subjects. Five pairs of reviewers independently screened and selected studies using predefined eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool, and data synthesis was performed using a random-effects model due to study heterogeneity. Evidence quality was evaluated using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine randomized trials were included. Pooled data showed no clinically significant differences between telehealth and control groups in improving systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and their changes over time. The mean difference (MD) of SBP in five trials was 0.78 mmHg lower (95% CI: 2.49 lower to 0.94 higher), and the SBP change showed a mean reduction of 2.29 mmHg (95% CI: 4.76 lower to 0.19 higher). DBP in five trials had a mean increase of 0.46 mmHg (95% CI: 0.73 lower to 1.64 higher), and DBP change in six trials showed a mean decrease of 0.83 mmHg (95% CI: 2.34 lower to 0.68 higher). Additionally, telehealth showed varying impacts on BMI and HbA1c levels, with one study reporting a higher BMI increase in the intervention group, while two other studies indicated that mobile health improved HbA1c levels and controlled blood pressure as effectively as standard care.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Study heterogeneity, selection, and performance biases, as well as varying healthcare contexts, limited the generalizability of findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Telemedicine is as effective as usual care in managing hypertension among adults in rural settings, providing a viable solution for improving healthcare access in these areas. Future research should address biases and explore long-term impacts to optimize telemedicine's effectiveness in diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"30 1","pages":"e70014"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Hypertension Management of Adults in Rural Communities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Valentin Dones, Abigail Anne G Velasquez, Maureen G Dacuya, Kirsten Ermengild T Ignacio, Ella Teresa M Cavite, Ronan S Ibuna, Christian Rey D Rimando\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pri.70014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telemedicine has emerged as an effective approach for managing hypertension, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is limited. This review evaluates telemedicine's role in providing essential remote healthcare services for hypertension management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We determined the effectiveness of telemedicine versus the usual care in hypertension management among adults living in rural settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on adults aged 18 and older with hypertension (blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg) using telehealth services in rural or community-based settings. We searched nine databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest, up to April 2024, without restrictions on language or publication year, focusing only on human subjects. Five pairs of reviewers independently screened and selected studies using predefined eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool, and data synthesis was performed using a random-effects model due to study heterogeneity. Evidence quality was evaluated using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine randomized trials were included. Pooled data showed no clinically significant differences between telehealth and control groups in improving systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and their changes over time. The mean difference (MD) of SBP in five trials was 0.78 mmHg lower (95% CI: 2.49 lower to 0.94 higher), and the SBP change showed a mean reduction of 2.29 mmHg (95% CI: 4.76 lower to 0.19 higher). DBP in five trials had a mean increase of 0.46 mmHg (95% CI: 0.73 lower to 1.64 higher), and DBP change in six trials showed a mean decrease of 0.83 mmHg (95% CI: 2.34 lower to 0.68 higher). Additionally, telehealth showed varying impacts on BMI and HbA1c levels, with one study reporting a higher BMI increase in the intervention group, while two other studies indicated that mobile health improved HbA1c levels and controlled blood pressure as effectively as standard care.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Study heterogeneity, selection, and performance biases, as well as varying healthcare contexts, limited the generalizability of findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Telemedicine is as effective as usual care in managing hypertension among adults in rural settings, providing a viable solution for improving healthcare access in these areas. Future research should address biases and explore long-term impacts to optimize telemedicine's effectiveness in diverse populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"e70014\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Hypertension Management of Adults in Rural Communities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background: Telemedicine has emerged as an effective approach for managing hypertension, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is limited. This review evaluates telemedicine's role in providing essential remote healthcare services for hypertension management.
Objective: We determined the effectiveness of telemedicine versus the usual care in hypertension management among adults living in rural settings.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on adults aged 18 and older with hypertension (blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg) using telehealth services in rural or community-based settings. We searched nine databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest, up to April 2024, without restrictions on language or publication year, focusing only on human subjects. Five pairs of reviewers independently screened and selected studies using predefined eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool, and data synthesis was performed using a random-effects model due to study heterogeneity. Evidence quality was evaluated using the GRADE approach.
Results: Nine randomized trials were included. Pooled data showed no clinically significant differences between telehealth and control groups in improving systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and their changes over time. The mean difference (MD) of SBP in five trials was 0.78 mmHg lower (95% CI: 2.49 lower to 0.94 higher), and the SBP change showed a mean reduction of 2.29 mmHg (95% CI: 4.76 lower to 0.19 higher). DBP in five trials had a mean increase of 0.46 mmHg (95% CI: 0.73 lower to 1.64 higher), and DBP change in six trials showed a mean decrease of 0.83 mmHg (95% CI: 2.34 lower to 0.68 higher). Additionally, telehealth showed varying impacts on BMI and HbA1c levels, with one study reporting a higher BMI increase in the intervention group, while two other studies indicated that mobile health improved HbA1c levels and controlled blood pressure as effectively as standard care.
Limitations: Study heterogeneity, selection, and performance biases, as well as varying healthcare contexts, limited the generalizability of findings.
Conclusion: Telemedicine is as effective as usual care in managing hypertension among adults in rural settings, providing a viable solution for improving healthcare access in these areas. Future research should address biases and explore long-term impacts to optimize telemedicine's effectiveness in diverse populations.
期刊介绍:
Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.