Daniel Farivar, Nolan B Condron, Nicholas J Peterman, Kenneth D Illingworth, David L Skaggs
{"title":"骨科医生的行业支付:开放支付数据库的地理空间分析。","authors":"Daniel Farivar, Nolan B Condron, Nicholas J Peterman, Kenneth D Illingworth, David L Skaggs","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There has been an increasing demand for transparency between industry and physicians. Several studies have evaluated the distribution of payment value and types to orthopaedic surgeons, but little is known about the spending patterns from an industry-centric perspective. The purpose of this study was to describe the payment patterns of top medical device companies in orthopaedics while presenting a geospatial analysis of these trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Open Payments database was assessed for all records of industry financial relationships with orthopaedic surgeons from 2015 to 2021. Value of financial relationships was expressed on a per orthopaedic surgeon basis, with the numerator representing total value of payments and denominator representing number of orthopaedic surgeons, and was geographically analyzed according to United States Census Divisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on averages during the study period, the top 10 paying companies were (1) DePuy, (2) Zimmer Biomet, (3) Stryker Corporation, (4) Arthrex, (5) SpineFrontier, (6) Medtronic, (7) Smith and Nephew, (8) Renovis Surgical Technologies, (9) NuVasive, and (10) Paragon 28. Payments in the South Atlantic ($6,854 ± $1,265) Division were significantly greater than all other eight divisions ( P < 0.001), with the next leading division being the Pacific Division ($4,114 ± $643). Five companies strongly favored one particular division, directing more than double the amount of payments to this division compared with the next leading division (SpineFrontier, 99% South Atlantic; Renovis Surgical Technologies, 81% Pacific; Paragon 28, 59% South Atlantic; NuVasive, 43% West North Central; DePuy, 35% South Atlantic). Only 3 of 10 companies were headquartered in the same division where most payments were made.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From 2015 to 2021, companies preferentially supported surgeons in certain geographic regions, irrespective of where they were headquartered in. Surgeons in the South Atlantic Division received significantly more payments than any other division by a wide margin.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"266-273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Industry Payments to Orthopaedic Surgeons: A Geospatial Analysis of the Open Payments Database.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Farivar, Nolan B Condron, Nicholas J Peterman, Kenneth D Illingworth, David L Skaggs\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There has been an increasing demand for transparency between industry and physicians. Several studies have evaluated the distribution of payment value and types to orthopaedic surgeons, but little is known about the spending patterns from an industry-centric perspective. The purpose of this study was to describe the payment patterns of top medical device companies in orthopaedics while presenting a geospatial analysis of these trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Open Payments database was assessed for all records of industry financial relationships with orthopaedic surgeons from 2015 to 2021. Value of financial relationships was expressed on a per orthopaedic surgeon basis, with the numerator representing total value of payments and denominator representing number of orthopaedic surgeons, and was geographically analyzed according to United States Census Divisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on averages during the study period, the top 10 paying companies were (1) DePuy, (2) Zimmer Biomet, (3) Stryker Corporation, (4) Arthrex, (5) SpineFrontier, (6) Medtronic, (7) Smith and Nephew, (8) Renovis Surgical Technologies, (9) NuVasive, and (10) Paragon 28. Payments in the South Atlantic ($6,854 ± $1,265) Division were significantly greater than all other eight divisions ( P < 0.001), with the next leading division being the Pacific Division ($4,114 ± $643). Five companies strongly favored one particular division, directing more than double the amount of payments to this division compared with the next leading division (SpineFrontier, 99% South Atlantic; Renovis Surgical Technologies, 81% Pacific; Paragon 28, 59% South Atlantic; NuVasive, 43% West North Central; DePuy, 35% South Atlantic). Only 3 of 10 companies were headquartered in the same division where most payments were made.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From 2015 to 2021, companies preferentially supported surgeons in certain geographic regions, irrespective of where they were headquartered in. Surgeons in the South Atlantic Division received significantly more payments than any other division by a wide margin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"266-273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00395\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00395","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:业界和医生之间对透明度的要求越来越高。一些研究已经评估了骨科医生的支付价值和类型的分布,但从以行业为中心的角度来看,对支出模式知之甚少。本研究的目的是描述骨科顶级医疗器械公司的支付模式,同时对这些趋势进行地理空间分析。方法:评估Open Payments数据库中2015 - 2021年骨科医生与行业财务关系的所有记录。财务关系的价值以每位骨科医生为基础表示,分子代表支付总额,分母代表骨科医生数量,并根据美国人口普查部门进行地理分析。结果:根据研究期间的平均值,支付费用最高的10家公司是(1)DePuy, (2) Zimmer Biomet, (3) Stryker Corporation, (4) Arthrex, (5) SpineFrontier, (6) Medtronic, (7) Smith and Nephew, (8) Renovis Surgical Technologies, (9) NuVasive和(10)Paragon 28。南大西洋分部的薪酬(6,854±1,265美元)显著高于其他所有8个分部(P < 0.001),其次是太平洋分部(4,114±643美元)。有五家公司强烈支持某一特定部门,与下一个主要部门(SpineFrontier, 99% South Atlantic;Renovis Surgical Technologies, 81% Pacific;Paragon 28, 59%南大西洋;NuVasive占43%,West North Central;代理,南大西洋35%)。在10家公司中,只有3家总部位于支付最多款项的同一个部门。结论:从2015年到2021年,公司优先支持特定地理区域的外科医生,而不考虑其总部在哪里。南大西洋分部的外科医生获得的报酬明显高于其他任何分部。
Industry Payments to Orthopaedic Surgeons: A Geospatial Analysis of the Open Payments Database.
Introduction: There has been an increasing demand for transparency between industry and physicians. Several studies have evaluated the distribution of payment value and types to orthopaedic surgeons, but little is known about the spending patterns from an industry-centric perspective. The purpose of this study was to describe the payment patterns of top medical device companies in orthopaedics while presenting a geospatial analysis of these trends.
Methods: The Open Payments database was assessed for all records of industry financial relationships with orthopaedic surgeons from 2015 to 2021. Value of financial relationships was expressed on a per orthopaedic surgeon basis, with the numerator representing total value of payments and denominator representing number of orthopaedic surgeons, and was geographically analyzed according to United States Census Divisions.
Results: Based on averages during the study period, the top 10 paying companies were (1) DePuy, (2) Zimmer Biomet, (3) Stryker Corporation, (4) Arthrex, (5) SpineFrontier, (6) Medtronic, (7) Smith and Nephew, (8) Renovis Surgical Technologies, (9) NuVasive, and (10) Paragon 28. Payments in the South Atlantic ($6,854 ± $1,265) Division were significantly greater than all other eight divisions ( P < 0.001), with the next leading division being the Pacific Division ($4,114 ± $643). Five companies strongly favored one particular division, directing more than double the amount of payments to this division compared with the next leading division (SpineFrontier, 99% South Atlantic; Renovis Surgical Technologies, 81% Pacific; Paragon 28, 59% South Atlantic; NuVasive, 43% West North Central; DePuy, 35% South Atlantic). Only 3 of 10 companies were headquartered in the same division where most payments were made.
Conclusion: From 2015 to 2021, companies preferentially supported surgeons in certain geographic regions, irrespective of where they were headquartered in. Surgeons in the South Atlantic Division received significantly more payments than any other division by a wide margin.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues.
Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.