本科物理治疗师在理论考试中使用互联网满足其信息需求:一项随机交叉试验。

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Cailbhe Doherty, Rachel Gilligan, Sadhbh O'Flaherty, Lewis Adelaide, Sean McGettigan, Garett Van Oirschot
{"title":"本科物理治疗师在理论考试中使用互联网满足其信息需求:一项随机交叉试验。","authors":"Cailbhe Doherty, Rachel Gilligan, Sadhbh O'Flaherty, Lewis Adelaide, Sean McGettigan, Garett Van Oirschot","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The internet is widely used by healthcare students and professionals alike to fulfil their information needs, yet limited research has utilised web log analysis to evaluate how they do so.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To elicit information needs among students via the administration of a multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) and to evaluate how they use the internet to fulfil these needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty final-year physiotherapy students (63% female) completed a MCQ under two conditions: i) 'assisted' with internet access and ii) 'unassisted' without internet access. Each participant completed both conditions in random order, with a washout period between sessions to minimize potential carryover effects. Generalised estimating equations were used to evaluate differences in exam score and the rate at which questions were answered correctly between conditions. Web log analysis was used to evaluate the kinds of web-based resources and the time spent doing so.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students' exam scores did not differ between assisted (61% ± 12%) and unassisted (47% ± 13%) conditions; p = 0.056. Students spent a median time of 23 seconds appraising internet resources before submitting an answer in the exam, and exhibited a heavy reliance on Google, which represented 65% of all 'hits.'</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Students were unable to leverage internet 'assistance' to improve their examination scores; the limited time they spent appraising web-based information and their heavy reliance on Google warrant further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"53 4","pages":"277-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undergraduate Physiotherapists' Use of the Internet to Fulfil Their Information Needs During a Theoretical Examination: A Randomized Crossover Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Cailbhe Doherty, Rachel Gilligan, Sadhbh O'Flaherty, Lewis Adelaide, Sean McGettigan, Garett Van Oirschot\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The internet is widely used by healthcare students and professionals alike to fulfil their information needs, yet limited research has utilised web log analysis to evaluate how they do so.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To elicit information needs among students via the administration of a multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) and to evaluate how they use the internet to fulfil these needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty final-year physiotherapy students (63% female) completed a MCQ under two conditions: i) 'assisted' with internet access and ii) 'unassisted' without internet access. Each participant completed both conditions in random order, with a washout period between sessions to minimize potential carryover effects. Generalised estimating equations were used to evaluate differences in exam score and the rate at which questions were answered correctly between conditions. Web log analysis was used to evaluate the kinds of web-based resources and the time spent doing so.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students' exam scores did not differ between assisted (61% ± 12%) and unassisted (47% ± 13%) conditions; p = 0.056. Students spent a median time of 23 seconds appraising internet resources before submitting an answer in the exam, and exhibited a heavy reliance on Google, which represented 65% of all 'hits.'</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Students were unable to leverage internet 'assistance' to improve their examination scores; the limited time they spent appraising web-based information and their heavy reliance on Google warrant further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"volume\":\"53 4\",\"pages\":\"277-285\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allied Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗保健学生和专业人士都广泛使用互联网来满足他们的信息需求,但有限的研究利用网络日志分析来评估他们是如何做到的。目的:通过多项选择问卷(MCQ)的管理来引出学生的信息需求,并评估他们如何使用互联网来满足这些需求。方法:40名高年级物理治疗学生(63%为女性)在两种情况下完成MCQ:“协助”上网及ii)没有互联网的“无辅助”。每个参与者以随机顺序完成两个条件,在两个阶段之间有一段洗脱期,以尽量减少潜在的遗留影响。使用广义估计方程来评估不同条件下考试成绩和问题答对率的差异。使用Web日志分析来评估基于Web的资源的种类及其所花费的时间。结果:学生考试成绩在辅助(61%±12%)和无辅助(47%±13%)条件下无差异;P = 0.056。在考试中,学生们在提交答案前平均花费23秒的时间来评估互联网资源,并且表现出对b谷歌的严重依赖,b谷歌占所有“点击”的65%。结论:学生无法利用网络“帮助”来提高考试成绩;他们花在评估网络信息上的时间有限,以及他们对b谷歌的严重依赖,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Undergraduate Physiotherapists' Use of the Internet to Fulfil Their Information Needs During a Theoretical Examination: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Background: The internet is widely used by healthcare students and professionals alike to fulfil their information needs, yet limited research has utilised web log analysis to evaluate how they do so.

Aims: To elicit information needs among students via the administration of a multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) and to evaluate how they use the internet to fulfil these needs.

Methods: Forty final-year physiotherapy students (63% female) completed a MCQ under two conditions: i) 'assisted' with internet access and ii) 'unassisted' without internet access. Each participant completed both conditions in random order, with a washout period between sessions to minimize potential carryover effects. Generalised estimating equations were used to evaluate differences in exam score and the rate at which questions were answered correctly between conditions. Web log analysis was used to evaluate the kinds of web-based resources and the time spent doing so.

Results: Students' exam scores did not differ between assisted (61% ± 12%) and unassisted (47% ± 13%) conditions; p = 0.056. Students spent a median time of 23 seconds appraising internet resources before submitting an answer in the exam, and exhibited a heavy reliance on Google, which represented 65% of all 'hits.'

Conclusion: Students were unable to leverage internet 'assistance' to improve their examination scores; the limited time they spent appraising web-based information and their heavy reliance on Google warrant further research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信