提供门静脉和肝动脉交替流动简化无缺血肝移植:适用性、有效性、安全性。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Liver Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1097/LVT.0000000000000545
Jiahao Li, Meiting Qin, Yunhua Tang, Jia Dan, Honghui Chen, Huadi Chen, Jinbo Huang, Yongqi Yang, Tielong Wang, Yefu Li, Maogen Chen, Weiqiang Ju, Dongping Wang, Zhiyong Guo, Haidong Tan, Xiaoshun He, Qiang Zhao
{"title":"提供门静脉和肝动脉交替流动简化无缺血肝移植:适用性、有效性、安全性。","authors":"Jiahao Li, Meiting Qin, Yunhua Tang, Jia Dan, Honghui Chen, Huadi Chen, Jinbo Huang, Yongqi Yang, Tielong Wang, Yefu Li, Maogen Chen, Weiqiang Ju, Dongping Wang, Zhiyong Guo, Haidong Tan, Xiaoshun He, Qiang Zhao","doi":"10.1097/LVT.0000000000000545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conventional ischemia-free liver transplantation (CIFLT) represents a pioneering procedure that circumvents ischemia-reperfusion injury to livers throughout the transplant procedure. However, its complexity has limited its widespread adoption. This study introduced a simplified ischemia-free liver transplantation (SIFLT) technique by providing an alternating flow of the portal vein and hepatic artery, demonstrating its efficacy and safety. In this retrospective study, 32 patients who received SIFLT and 32 who received CIFLT were included between January 2021 and January 2024. The intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were collected and elevated. Patients who underwent SIFLT had a shorter anhepatic phase (44.0±2.4 vs. 51.6±2.4 min, p =0.03), along with a comparatively reduced intraoperative blood loss compared to those who underwent CIFLT. Furthermore, the SIFLT group exhibited significantly lower peak AST levels within postoperative 7 days (413.1±62.6 vs. 707.5±110.7 U/L, p =0.02). The incidence of early allograft dysfunction, primary nonfunction, and transplant-related complications were similar across both groups. There were no significant differences in the number of Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications and comprehensive complication index at 3 months after transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed similar patient and graft survival rates. The subgroup analysis of extended criteria donor demonstrated that SIFLT can effectively reduce anhepatic phase and intraoperative blood loss and can achieve a clinical prognosis similar to CIFLT. Additionally, histological analysis revealed that both groups demonstrated well-preserved livers and bile ducts. The SIFLT simplifies the intricate surgical procedure while ensuring the protection of livers from ischemia-reperfusion injury. This technique holds promise for enabling patients to achieve clinical outcomes comparable to those of CIFLT.</p>","PeriodicalId":18072,"journal":{"name":"Liver Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"737-749"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplified ischemia-free liver transplantation by providing alternating flow of the portal vein and hepatic artery: Applicability, efficiency, and safety.\",\"authors\":\"Jiahao Li, Meiting Qin, Yunhua Tang, Jia Dan, Honghui Chen, Huadi Chen, Jinbo Huang, Yongqi Yang, Tielong Wang, Yefu Li, Maogen Chen, Weiqiang Ju, Dongping Wang, Zhiyong Guo, Haidong Tan, Xiaoshun He, Qiang Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/LVT.0000000000000545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Conventional ischemia-free liver transplantation (CIFLT) represents a pioneering procedure that circumvents ischemia-reperfusion injury to livers throughout the transplant procedure. However, its complexity has limited its widespread adoption. This study introduced a simplified ischemia-free liver transplantation (SIFLT) technique by providing an alternating flow of the portal vein and hepatic artery, demonstrating its efficacy and safety. In this retrospective study, 32 patients who received SIFLT and 32 who received CIFLT were included between January 2021 and January 2024. The intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were collected and elevated. Patients who underwent SIFLT had a shorter anhepatic phase (44.0±2.4 vs. 51.6±2.4 min, p =0.03), along with a comparatively reduced intraoperative blood loss compared to those who underwent CIFLT. Furthermore, the SIFLT group exhibited significantly lower peak AST levels within postoperative 7 days (413.1±62.6 vs. 707.5±110.7 U/L, p =0.02). The incidence of early allograft dysfunction, primary nonfunction, and transplant-related complications were similar across both groups. There were no significant differences in the number of Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications and comprehensive complication index at 3 months after transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed similar patient and graft survival rates. The subgroup analysis of extended criteria donor demonstrated that SIFLT can effectively reduce anhepatic phase and intraoperative blood loss and can achieve a clinical prognosis similar to CIFLT. Additionally, histological analysis revealed that both groups demonstrated well-preserved livers and bile ducts. The SIFLT simplifies the intricate surgical procedure while ensuring the protection of livers from ischemia-reperfusion injury. This technique holds promise for enabling patients to achieve clinical outcomes comparable to those of CIFLT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liver Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"737-749\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liver Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000545\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000545","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的无缺血肝移植(CIFLT)是一种开创性的手术,在整个移植过程中可以避免肝脏缺血再灌注损伤(IRI)。然而,它的复杂性限制了它的广泛采用。本研究介绍了一种简化的无缺血肝移植(SIFLT)技术,通过提供门静脉和肝动脉交替流动,证明了其有效性和安全性。在这项回顾性研究中,在2021年1月至2024年1月期间纳入了32例接受SIFLT和32例接受CIFLT的患者。收集术中和术后结果并进行统计。与CIFLT相比,接受SIFLT的患者无肝期更短(44.0±2.4分钟vs 51.6±2.4分钟,p=0.03),术中出血量也相对减少。此外,SIFLT组在术后7天内AST峰值水平明显降低(413.1±62.6 U/L vs 707.5±110.7 U/L, p=0.02)。两组患者的早期异体移植物功能障碍、原发性无功能、移植相关并发症发生率相似。移植后3个月两组手术并发症Clavien-Dindo分类数及综合并发症指数差异无统计学意义。Kaplan-Meier分析证实了相似的患者和移植物存活率。扩展标准供者亚组分析表明,SIFLT可有效减少无肝期及术中出血量,临床预后与CIFLT相似。此外,组织学分析显示两组肝脏和胆管保存完好。SIFLT简化了复杂的手术程序,同时确保肝脏免受IRI的保护。该技术有望使患者获得与CIFLT相当的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simplified ischemia-free liver transplantation by providing alternating flow of the portal vein and hepatic artery: Applicability, efficiency, and safety.

Conventional ischemia-free liver transplantation (CIFLT) represents a pioneering procedure that circumvents ischemia-reperfusion injury to livers throughout the transplant procedure. However, its complexity has limited its widespread adoption. This study introduced a simplified ischemia-free liver transplantation (SIFLT) technique by providing an alternating flow of the portal vein and hepatic artery, demonstrating its efficacy and safety. In this retrospective study, 32 patients who received SIFLT and 32 who received CIFLT were included between January 2021 and January 2024. The intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were collected and elevated. Patients who underwent SIFLT had a shorter anhepatic phase (44.0±2.4 vs. 51.6±2.4 min, p =0.03), along with a comparatively reduced intraoperative blood loss compared to those who underwent CIFLT. Furthermore, the SIFLT group exhibited significantly lower peak AST levels within postoperative 7 days (413.1±62.6 vs. 707.5±110.7 U/L, p =0.02). The incidence of early allograft dysfunction, primary nonfunction, and transplant-related complications were similar across both groups. There were no significant differences in the number of Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications and comprehensive complication index at 3 months after transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed similar patient and graft survival rates. The subgroup analysis of extended criteria donor demonstrated that SIFLT can effectively reduce anhepatic phase and intraoperative blood loss and can achieve a clinical prognosis similar to CIFLT. Additionally, histological analysis revealed that both groups demonstrated well-preserved livers and bile ducts. The SIFLT simplifies the intricate surgical procedure while ensuring the protection of livers from ischemia-reperfusion injury. This technique holds promise for enabling patients to achieve clinical outcomes comparable to those of CIFLT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Liver Transplantation
Liver Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Since the first application of liver transplantation in a clinical situation was reported more than twenty years ago, there has been a great deal of growth in this field and more is anticipated. As an official publication of the AASLD, Liver Transplantation delivers current, peer-reviewed articles on liver transplantation, liver surgery, and chronic liver disease — the information necessary to keep abreast of this evolving specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信