Ali Motamed-Sanaye, Ali Mortezaei, Amir R Afshari, Zahra Saadatian, Amir H Faraji, Jason P Sheehan, Ali Mohammad Mokhtari
{"title":"血管生成抑制剂对新诊断的原发性多形性胶质母细胞瘤的总生存期和无进展生存期的影响:12项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。","authors":"Ali Motamed-Sanaye, Ali Mortezaei, Amir R Afshari, Zahra Saadatian, Amir H Faraji, Jason P Sheehan, Ali Mohammad Mokhtari","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04865-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor in adults. Typically treated with initial surgical resection, and chemoradiotherapy, despite current treatments, patients typically survive only 12-14 months, necessitating new therapeutic approaches. Our meta-analysis evaluates combining antiangiogenic medications with chemoradiotherapy versus using chemoradiotherapy alone in treating newly diagnosed GBM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane and the Web of Science databases. The search aimed to identify studies reporting overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and hazard ratio (HR) with corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. We employed random-effect meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involved 3,309 patients included in the study. The findings showed that angiogenesis inhibitors significantly prolonged PFS [HR 0.85, 95% CI (0.73, 0.99), p-value = 0.04], while there was no significant difference on OS [HR 1.014, 95%CI (0.89, 1.15), p-value = 0.84]. Bevacizumab (BEV) exhibited the highest [HR 0.67, 95% CI (0.56, 0.79), p-value < 0.0001] and thalidomide exhibited the lowest [HR 1.46, 95% CI (1.004, 2.1), p-value = 0.048] improvements of PFS. Meta-regression revealed that age, white race, study sample size, infection, vascular disease complications, KPS > 60, biopsy, gross and subtotal resection can significantly influenced the PFS, while only the year of publication affected OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study showed that improve the PFS with no significant effect on OS. Our findings may provide some evidence for decision-making regarding the utilization of angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed GBM.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"313-328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Angiogenesis inhibitors effects on overall survival and progression-free survival in newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma multiforme: a meta-analysis of twelve randomized clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Motamed-Sanaye, Ali Mortezaei, Amir R Afshari, Zahra Saadatian, Amir H Faraji, Jason P Sheehan, Ali Mohammad Mokhtari\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11060-024-04865-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor in adults. Typically treated with initial surgical resection, and chemoradiotherapy, despite current treatments, patients typically survive only 12-14 months, necessitating new therapeutic approaches. Our meta-analysis evaluates combining antiangiogenic medications with chemoradiotherapy versus using chemoradiotherapy alone in treating newly diagnosed GBM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane and the Web of Science databases. The search aimed to identify studies reporting overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and hazard ratio (HR) with corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. We employed random-effect meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involved 3,309 patients included in the study. The findings showed that angiogenesis inhibitors significantly prolonged PFS [HR 0.85, 95% CI (0.73, 0.99), p-value = 0.04], while there was no significant difference on OS [HR 1.014, 95%CI (0.89, 1.15), p-value = 0.84]. Bevacizumab (BEV) exhibited the highest [HR 0.67, 95% CI (0.56, 0.79), p-value < 0.0001] and thalidomide exhibited the lowest [HR 1.46, 95% CI (1.004, 2.1), p-value = 0.048] improvements of PFS. Meta-regression revealed that age, white race, study sample size, infection, vascular disease complications, KPS > 60, biopsy, gross and subtotal resection can significantly influenced the PFS, while only the year of publication affected OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study showed that improve the PFS with no significant effect on OS. Our findings may provide some evidence for decision-making regarding the utilization of angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed GBM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"313-328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04865-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04865-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Angiogenesis inhibitors effects on overall survival and progression-free survival in newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma multiforme: a meta-analysis of twelve randomized clinical trials.
Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor in adults. Typically treated with initial surgical resection, and chemoradiotherapy, despite current treatments, patients typically survive only 12-14 months, necessitating new therapeutic approaches. Our meta-analysis evaluates combining antiangiogenic medications with chemoradiotherapy versus using chemoradiotherapy alone in treating newly diagnosed GBM.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane and the Web of Science databases. The search aimed to identify studies reporting overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and hazard ratio (HR) with corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. We employed random-effect meta-analysis.
Results: Twelve randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involved 3,309 patients included in the study. The findings showed that angiogenesis inhibitors significantly prolonged PFS [HR 0.85, 95% CI (0.73, 0.99), p-value = 0.04], while there was no significant difference on OS [HR 1.014, 95%CI (0.89, 1.15), p-value = 0.84]. Bevacizumab (BEV) exhibited the highest [HR 0.67, 95% CI (0.56, 0.79), p-value < 0.0001] and thalidomide exhibited the lowest [HR 1.46, 95% CI (1.004, 2.1), p-value = 0.048] improvements of PFS. Meta-regression revealed that age, white race, study sample size, infection, vascular disease complications, KPS > 60, biopsy, gross and subtotal resection can significantly influenced the PFS, while only the year of publication affected OS.
Conclusions: The current study showed that improve the PFS with no significant effect on OS. Our findings may provide some evidence for decision-making regarding the utilization of angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed GBM.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.