İbrahim Ulaş Özturan MD , Duygu Ferek Emir MD , Adnan Karadaş MD , Cansu Alyeşil Özturan MD , Uğur Durmuş MD , Nurettin Özgür Doğan MD , Elif Yaka MD , Serkan Yılmaz MD , Murat Pekdemir MD
{"title":"视觉、失语和忽视、Ventura紧急大血管闭塞和大动脉颅内闭塞筛查工具在紧急大血管闭塞卒中中的外部验证:一项多中心、前瞻性、横断面研究。","authors":"İbrahim Ulaş Özturan MD , Duygu Ferek Emir MD , Adnan Karadaş MD , Cansu Alyeşil Özturan MD , Uğur Durmuş MD , Nurettin Özgür Doğan MD , Elif Yaka MD , Serkan Yılmaz MD , Murat Pekdemir MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vision, Aphasia, and Neglect (VAN), Ventura Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion (VES), and Large Artery Intracranial Occlusion (LARIO) are promising stroke screening tools that were shown to have high diagnostic performance to detect Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion (ELVO) in their derivation studies.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the validation of VAN, VES, and LARIO in predicting ELVO among patients presenting at emergency department (ED) triage with suspected acute ischemic stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a prospective multicenter study conducted in five EDs of tertiary stroke centers between June and October 2023. Patients with suspected stroke admitted to ED for triage were evaluated using the VAN, VES, and LARIO stroke screening tools. Diagnostic performances of these tools for predicting ELVO were determined and compared with the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 614 patients were included. The prevalence of ELVO was found to be 23.5% in the study population. VAN exhibited a sensitivity of 70.1% and specificity of 78.7%, VES showed a higher sensitivity (79.1%) with lower specificity (63.4%), while LARIO displayed high specificity (86%) with lower sensitivity (56.3%). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that LARIO and NIHSS had similar diagnostic performance (areas under the curve [AUC] 0.801 and 0.805, <em>p</em> = 0.7, respectively), while VES showed a modestly poorer performance (AUC 0.746, <em>p</em> < 0.001 and <em>p</em> = 0.003).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The comparable diagnostic performance of VAN, VES, and LARIO to the NIHSS, in addition to their straightforwardness and rapid evaluation time, can facilitate optimal care for patients with ELVO in prehospital or ED triage settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 15-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External Validation of Vision, Aphasia and Neglect, Ventura Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion and Large Artery Intracranial Occlusion Screening Tools for Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"İbrahim Ulaş Özturan MD , Duygu Ferek Emir MD , Adnan Karadaş MD , Cansu Alyeşil Özturan MD , Uğur Durmuş MD , Nurettin Özgür Doğan MD , Elif Yaka MD , Serkan Yılmaz MD , Murat Pekdemir MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vision, Aphasia, and Neglect (VAN), Ventura Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion (VES), and Large Artery Intracranial Occlusion (LARIO) are promising stroke screening tools that were shown to have high diagnostic performance to detect Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion (ELVO) in their derivation studies.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the validation of VAN, VES, and LARIO in predicting ELVO among patients presenting at emergency department (ED) triage with suspected acute ischemic stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a prospective multicenter study conducted in five EDs of tertiary stroke centers between June and October 2023. Patients with suspected stroke admitted to ED for triage were evaluated using the VAN, VES, and LARIO stroke screening tools. Diagnostic performances of these tools for predicting ELVO were determined and compared with the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 614 patients were included. The prevalence of ELVO was found to be 23.5% in the study population. VAN exhibited a sensitivity of 70.1% and specificity of 78.7%, VES showed a higher sensitivity (79.1%) with lower specificity (63.4%), while LARIO displayed high specificity (86%) with lower sensitivity (56.3%). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that LARIO and NIHSS had similar diagnostic performance (areas under the curve [AUC] 0.801 and 0.805, <em>p</em> = 0.7, respectively), while VES showed a modestly poorer performance (AUC 0.746, <em>p</em> < 0.001 and <em>p</em> = 0.003).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The comparable diagnostic performance of VAN, VES, and LARIO to the NIHSS, in addition to their straightforwardness and rapid evaluation time, can facilitate optimal care for patients with ELVO in prehospital or ED triage settings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"68 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 15-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467924002324\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467924002324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
External Validation of Vision, Aphasia and Neglect, Ventura Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion and Large Artery Intracranial Occlusion Screening Tools for Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study
Background
Vision, Aphasia, and Neglect (VAN), Ventura Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion (VES), and Large Artery Intracranial Occlusion (LARIO) are promising stroke screening tools that were shown to have high diagnostic performance to detect Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion (ELVO) in their derivation studies.
Objectives
This study aimed to assess the validation of VAN, VES, and LARIO in predicting ELVO among patients presenting at emergency department (ED) triage with suspected acute ischemic stroke.
Methods
This is a prospective multicenter study conducted in five EDs of tertiary stroke centers between June and October 2023. Patients with suspected stroke admitted to ED for triage were evaluated using the VAN, VES, and LARIO stroke screening tools. Diagnostic performances of these tools for predicting ELVO were determined and compared with the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).
Results
A total of 614 patients were included. The prevalence of ELVO was found to be 23.5% in the study population. VAN exhibited a sensitivity of 70.1% and specificity of 78.7%, VES showed a higher sensitivity (79.1%) with lower specificity (63.4%), while LARIO displayed high specificity (86%) with lower sensitivity (56.3%). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that LARIO and NIHSS had similar diagnostic performance (areas under the curve [AUC] 0.801 and 0.805, p = 0.7, respectively), while VES showed a modestly poorer performance (AUC 0.746, p < 0.001 and p = 0.003).
Conclusion
The comparable diagnostic performance of VAN, VES, and LARIO to the NIHSS, in addition to their straightforwardness and rapid evaluation time, can facilitate optimal care for patients with ELVO in prehospital or ED triage settings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections:
• Original Contributions
• Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN
• Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care
• Techniques and Procedures
• Technical Tips
• Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine
• Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine
• Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency
• Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine
• Medical Classics
• Emergency Forum
• Editorial(s)
• Letters to the Editor
• Education
• Administration of Emergency Medicine
• International Emergency Medicine
• Computers in Emergency Medicine
• Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention
• Ethics
• Humanities and Medicine
• American Academy of Emergency Medicine
• AAEM Medical Student Forum
• Book and Other Media Reviews
• Calendar of Events
• Abstracts
• Trauma Reports
• Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine