Polatuzumab Vedotin联合利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、阿霉素和强的松治疗未经治疗的弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤的疗效和安全性:一项真实世界、多中心、回顾性队列研究

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Peiqi Zhao, Shu Zhao, Chen Huang, Yajun Li, Jiesong Wang, Junqing Xu, Lanfang Li, Zhengzi Qian, Wei Li, Shiyong Zhou, Lihua Qiu, Xianming Liu, Ying Chen, Yanan Jiang, Yanbin Zheng, Daoguang Chen, Hui Zhou, Yuhuan Gao, Qingyuan Zhang, Huilai Zhang
{"title":"Polatuzumab Vedotin联合利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、阿霉素和强的松治疗未经治疗的弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤的疗效和安全性:一项真实世界、多中心、回顾性队列研究","authors":"Peiqi Zhao,&nbsp;Shu Zhao,&nbsp;Chen Huang,&nbsp;Yajun Li,&nbsp;Jiesong Wang,&nbsp;Junqing Xu,&nbsp;Lanfang Li,&nbsp;Zhengzi Qian,&nbsp;Wei Li,&nbsp;Shiyong Zhou,&nbsp;Lihua Qiu,&nbsp;Xianming Liu,&nbsp;Ying Chen,&nbsp;Yanan Jiang,&nbsp;Yanbin Zheng,&nbsp;Daoguang Chen,&nbsp;Hui Zhou,&nbsp;Yuhuan Gao,&nbsp;Qingyuan Zhang,&nbsp;Huilai Zhang","doi":"10.1002/hon.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Polatuzumab vedotin plus R-CHP (Pola-R-CHP) is approved as a new standard first-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) based on the POLARIX trial. However, real-world data on its efficacy and safety in unselected patients is lacking. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP outcomes in routine clinical practice in China. This is a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study and included all consecutive patients that received at least one dose of polatuzumab vedotin up until February 2024. A total of 600 eligible patients from 6 centers were identified, 131 receiving Pola-R-CHP and 469 R-CHOP. After 1:2 propensity score matching, 128 pairs were obtained for further survival and prognosis analysis. With a median follow-up of 12.8 months, 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically higher with Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP (90.3% vs. 84.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.18). Benefits were consistently observed across molecular subgroups, especially advanced stage, ECOG ≥ 2, extranodal involvement ≥ 2 and non-GCB group. The complete response rate of the Pola-R-CHP group was higher than that of the RCHOP group (86.8% vs. 79.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.09), but there was no statistical difference. Safety profiles were comparable, with no new concerns. Among 128 patients treated with Pola-R-CHP, 96 underwent gene sequencing analysis: MCD (25.0%), EZB (13.5%), combined subtype (12.5%), ST2 (9.4%), and other/unclassifiable subtype (30.2%). The most common mutations (&gt; 25% of cases) were PIM1, TP53, BCL-6, KMT2D, SOCS1, BCL-2. Genetic testing results show the correlation between genotyping, gene mutations in PIM1/TP53 and therapeutic efficacy. This large real-world study supports Pola-R-CHP as an effective frontline option for DLBCL, with sustained efficacy versus R-CHOP observed in unselected populations. While 12-month PFS failed to reach statistical significance, subgroup analyses favor Pola-R-CHP. Further research with a wider population, longer follow-up, and screening of advantageous groups are warranted.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12882,"journal":{"name":"Hematological Oncology","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Prednisone for Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Real-World, Multi-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Peiqi Zhao,&nbsp;Shu Zhao,&nbsp;Chen Huang,&nbsp;Yajun Li,&nbsp;Jiesong Wang,&nbsp;Junqing Xu,&nbsp;Lanfang Li,&nbsp;Zhengzi Qian,&nbsp;Wei Li,&nbsp;Shiyong Zhou,&nbsp;Lihua Qiu,&nbsp;Xianming Liu,&nbsp;Ying Chen,&nbsp;Yanan Jiang,&nbsp;Yanbin Zheng,&nbsp;Daoguang Chen,&nbsp;Hui Zhou,&nbsp;Yuhuan Gao,&nbsp;Qingyuan Zhang,&nbsp;Huilai Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hon.70017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Polatuzumab vedotin plus R-CHP (Pola-R-CHP) is approved as a new standard first-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) based on the POLARIX trial. However, real-world data on its efficacy and safety in unselected patients is lacking. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP outcomes in routine clinical practice in China. This is a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study and included all consecutive patients that received at least one dose of polatuzumab vedotin up until February 2024. A total of 600 eligible patients from 6 centers were identified, 131 receiving Pola-R-CHP and 469 R-CHOP. After 1:2 propensity score matching, 128 pairs were obtained for further survival and prognosis analysis. With a median follow-up of 12.8 months, 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically higher with Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP (90.3% vs. 84.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.18). Benefits were consistently observed across molecular subgroups, especially advanced stage, ECOG ≥ 2, extranodal involvement ≥ 2 and non-GCB group. The complete response rate of the Pola-R-CHP group was higher than that of the RCHOP group (86.8% vs. 79.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.09), but there was no statistical difference. Safety profiles were comparable, with no new concerns. Among 128 patients treated with Pola-R-CHP, 96 underwent gene sequencing analysis: MCD (25.0%), EZB (13.5%), combined subtype (12.5%), ST2 (9.4%), and other/unclassifiable subtype (30.2%). The most common mutations (&gt; 25% of cases) were PIM1, TP53, BCL-6, KMT2D, SOCS1, BCL-2. Genetic testing results show the correlation between genotyping, gene mutations in PIM1/TP53 and therapeutic efficacy. This large real-world study supports Pola-R-CHP as an effective frontline option for DLBCL, with sustained efficacy versus R-CHOP observed in unselected populations. While 12-month PFS failed to reach statistical significance, subgroup analyses favor Pola-R-CHP. Further research with a wider population, longer follow-up, and screening of advantageous groups are warranted.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematological Oncology\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematological Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hon.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Polatuzumab vedotin + R-CHP (Pola-R-CHP)被批准为基于POLARIX试验的弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的新标准一线治疗。然而,在未选择的患者中,缺乏关于其有效性和安全性的真实数据。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以评估Pola-R-CHP与R-CHOP在中国常规临床实践中的结果。这是一项多机构回顾性队列研究,包括所有连续接受至少一剂polatuzumab vedotin治疗的患者,直至2024年2月。共有来自6个中心的600名符合条件的患者被确定,131名接受Pola-R-CHP治疗,469名接受R-CHOP治疗。经1:2倾向评分匹配,获得128对,进一步进行生存和预后分析。中位随访时间为12.8个月,Pola-R-CHP组的12个月无进展生存率(PFS)高于R-CHOP组(90.3% vs 84.1%, p = 0.18)。在分子亚组中一致观察到获益,特别是晚期,ECOG≥2,结外累及≥2和非gcb组。Pola-R-CHP组的完全缓解率高于RCHOP组(86.8% vs. 79.7%;P = 0.09),但差异无统计学意义。安全概况可比较,没有新的担忧。在128例接受Pola-R-CHP治疗的患者中,96例进行了基因测序分析:MCD(25.0%)、EZB(13.5%)、联合亚型(12.5%)、ST2(9.4%)和其他/不可分类亚型(30.2%)。最常见的突变是PIM1、TP53、BCL-6、KMT2D、SOCS1、BCL-2(占25%)。基因检测结果显示,基因分型、PIM1/TP53基因突变与治疗效果相关。这项大型现实研究支持Pola-R-CHP作为DLBCL的有效一线治疗方案,与R-CHOP相比,在未选择的人群中观察到持续的疗效。虽然12个月PFS没有达到统计学意义,但亚组分析倾向于Pola-R-CHP。进一步研究更广泛的人群,更长时间的随访,并筛选有利群体是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Polatuzumab Vedotin Plus Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Prednisone for Previously Untreated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Real-World, Multi-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study

Polatuzumab vedotin plus R-CHP (Pola-R-CHP) is approved as a new standard first-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) based on the POLARIX trial. However, real-world data on its efficacy and safety in unselected patients is lacking. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP outcomes in routine clinical practice in China. This is a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study and included all consecutive patients that received at least one dose of polatuzumab vedotin up until February 2024. A total of 600 eligible patients from 6 centers were identified, 131 receiving Pola-R-CHP and 469 R-CHOP. After 1:2 propensity score matching, 128 pairs were obtained for further survival and prognosis analysis. With a median follow-up of 12.8 months, 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically higher with Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP (90.3% vs. 84.1%, p = 0.18). Benefits were consistently observed across molecular subgroups, especially advanced stage, ECOG ≥ 2, extranodal involvement ≥ 2 and non-GCB group. The complete response rate of the Pola-R-CHP group was higher than that of the RCHOP group (86.8% vs. 79.7%; p = 0.09), but there was no statistical difference. Safety profiles were comparable, with no new concerns. Among 128 patients treated with Pola-R-CHP, 96 underwent gene sequencing analysis: MCD (25.0%), EZB (13.5%), combined subtype (12.5%), ST2 (9.4%), and other/unclassifiable subtype (30.2%). The most common mutations (> 25% of cases) were PIM1, TP53, BCL-6, KMT2D, SOCS1, BCL-2. Genetic testing results show the correlation between genotyping, gene mutations in PIM1/TP53 and therapeutic efficacy. This large real-world study supports Pola-R-CHP as an effective frontline option for DLBCL, with sustained efficacy versus R-CHOP observed in unselected populations. While 12-month PFS failed to reach statistical significance, subgroup analyses favor Pola-R-CHP. Further research with a wider population, longer follow-up, and screening of advantageous groups are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hematological Oncology
Hematological Oncology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
147
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hematological Oncology considers for publication articles dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neoplastic diseases of the hemopoietic and lymphoid systems and relevant related matters. Translational studies applying basic science to clinical issues are particularly welcomed. Manuscripts dealing with the following areas are encouraged: -Clinical practice and management of hematological neoplasia, including: acute and chronic leukemias, malignant lymphomas, myeloproliferative disorders -Diagnostic investigations, including imaging and laboratory assays -Epidemiology, pathology and pathobiology of hematological neoplasia of hematological diseases -Therapeutic issues including Phase 1, 2 or 3 trials as well as allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation studies -Aspects of the cell biology, molecular biology, molecular genetics and cytogenetics of normal or diseased hematopoeisis and lymphopoiesis, including stem cells and cytokines and other regulatory systems. Concise, topical review material is welcomed, especially if it makes new concepts and ideas accessible to a wider community. Proposals for review material may be discussed with the Editor-in-Chief. Collections of case material and case reports will be considered only if they have broader scientific or clinical relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信